Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:13:01.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of pen size and an enrichment structure (elevated platform) on the performances and the behaviour of fattening rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

G Postollec ,
E Boilletot ,
R Maurice  and
V Michel
G Postollec*
Affiliation:
Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France
E Boilletot
Affiliation:
Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France
R Maurice
Affiliation:
Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France
V Michel
Affiliation:
Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France
*
* Contact for correspondence and request for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effects of a (30 cm high) elevated platform as an enrichment structure on the behaviour and performance of fattening rabbits kept in groups were investigated. Three housing systems for fattening rabbits were compared using a stocking density of 15 rabbits m–2. The rabbits were housed either in large pens (3.67 m2 plus a platform of 0.39 m2; with 60 rabbits per pen) or in small pens (0.503 m2 plus a platform of 0.159 m2; with10 rabbits per pen), or in conventional standard cages (0.39 m2, with 6 rabbits and without any enrichment) from 31 to 72 days of age. The conventional cages without a platform were used as a control and reference model. Rabbits housed in each small pen or in each cage belonged to the same litter, and the 60 rabbits sharing the same large pen were from six or seven litters. At the end of fattening, rabbits reached the weight of 2,508 g in cages, 2,397 g in small pens, and 2,340 g in large pens; the only significant difference was daily weight gain which was better in cages than in both pens. There was no difference in growth parameters between the two types of pens. The mortality rate was less than 1% for all treatments. No sanitation problems or severe lesions were seen with rabbits even those reared in large pens and large groups. Neither housing systems, nor elevated platform affected activities such as dietary intake or resting. The use of the platform appears to depend upon the amount of space available; in a large pen, an elevated platform can be utilised as an exercise structure while in a small pen it was used more as simply extra space to occupy.

Keywords

animal welfarefattening rabbitsgroup sizehousing systempen housingplatform
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 53 - 59
Copyright
© 2008 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Altman, J 1974 Observational study of behaviour: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumans, V 2005 Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: Requirements of rodents, rabbits and research. ILAR Journal 46: 162–170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe 2002 Draft recommendation concerning domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Standing committee of the European convention for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes, T-AP (98)-1, 8th revision. 18-20 September 2002, Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
Dal Bosco, A, Castellini, C and Mugnai, C 2002 Rearing rabbits on a wire net floor or straw litter; behaviour, growth and meat qualitive traits. Livestock Production Science 75: 149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, B 1992 Housing of rabbits with respect to animal welfare. Journal Applied Rabbit Research 15: 678–683Google Scholar
Drescher, B and Schlender-Bobbis, L 1996 Etude pathologique de la pododermatite chez les lapins reproducteurs de souche lourde sur grillage. World Rabbit Science 4: 143–148. [Title translation: Pathological study of pododermatitis among heavy breeding rabbits on wire floors]Google Scholar
Lehman, M 1987 Interference of a restricted environment as found in battery cages with normal behaviour in young fattening rabbits. Rabbit production system including welfare pp 257–268. CEE Publications: LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
Marai, IFM and Rashwan, AA 2004 Rabbits behavioural response to climatic and managerial conditions – a review. Archiv Fur Tierzucht – Archives of Animal Breeding 47: 469–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcato, PS and Rosmini, R 1996 Ulcerative pododermatitis. In: Pathology of the rabbit and hare pp 11–12. Societa Editrice Esculapio: Bologna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Maertens, L and Van Herck, A 2000 Performance of weaned rabbits raised in pens or in classical cages: First results. World Rabbit Science 8(S1): 435–440Google Scholar
Maertens, L and Van Oeckel, MJ 2001 The fattening rabbits in pens: Effect of housing and gnawing material on performance level and carcass quality. In: 12th Symposium on Housing Diseases in Rabbits, Furbearing Animals and Pet Animals pp 156-161. 5-9 October 2001, Celle, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Martranchar, A, Boilletot, E, Cotte, JP and Morisse, JP 2000 Wire floor pens as an alternative to metallic cages in fattening rabbits; Influence on some welfare traits. Animal Welfare 10: 153–161Google Scholar
Mirabito, L, Gaillot, P and Souchet, C 2000 Effect of different ways of cage enrichment on the productive traits and mortality of fattening rabbits. World Rabbit Science 8(S1): 447–452Google Scholar
Morisse, JP, Boilletot, E and Martranchar, A 1999 Grillage ou litière: Choix par le lapin et incidence sur le bien-être. 8èmes Journées de la Recherche Cunicole pp 63–66. 9-10 June 1999, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Institut Technique de l'Aviculture, Paris France. [Title translation: Wire netting floor or straw litter, preference and incidence on welfare in rabbits]: Wire netting floor or straw litter, preference and incidence on welfare in rabbits]Google Scholar
Morisse, JP and Maurice, R 1997 Influence of stocking density or group size on behaviour of fattening rabbits kept under intensive conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, DB, Jennings, M, Batchelor, GR, Bell, D, Birke, L, Davies, K, Eveleigh, JR, Gunn, D, Heath, M, Howard, B, Koder, P, Philips, J, Poole, T, Sainsbury, AW, Sales, GD, Smith, DJA, Stauffacher, M and Turner, RJ 1993 Refinements in rabbit husbandry. Second report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. Laboratory Animals 27: 301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mykytowyc, R and Dudzinski, ML 1972 Aggressive and protective behaviour of adult rabbits towards juveniles. Behaviour 43: 9–120Google Scholar
Postollec, G, Boilletot, E, Maurice, R and Michel, V 2006 The effect of housing system on the behaviour and growth parameters of fattening rabbits. Animal Welfare 15: 105–111Google Scholar
Rommers, J and Meijerhof, R 1998 Effect of group size on performance, bone strength and skin lesions of meat rabbits housed under commercial conditions. World Rabbit Science 6: 299–302Google Scholar
Stauffacher, M 1992 Group housing and enrichment cages for breeding, fattening and laboratory rabbits. Animal Welfare 1: 105–125Google Scholar
Stauffacher, M 1997 Comparative studies on housing conditions. In: O'Donoghue PN (ed) Harmonization of Laboratory animal husbandry. 5-9 June 1997, Royal Society Medical Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Stauffacher, M 2000 Refinement in rabbit housing and husbandry. In: Balls, M, van Zeller, AM and Halder, ME (eds) Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation: Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences pp 1269–1277. 29 August-2 September 2000, Bologna, Italy: Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Turner, RJ, Held, SD, Hirst, JE, Billinghurst, G and Wootton, RJ 1997 An immunological assessment of group housed rabbits. Laboratory Animal 31: 362–372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Horst, F, Jehl, N and Koehl, PF 1999 Influence du mode d'élevage (cage ou parc) sur les performances de croissance et les qualités bouchères des lapins de race normande. 8èmes Journées de la Recherche Cunicole pp 71–74. 9-10 June 1999, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) Institut Technique de l'Aviculture, Paris France. [Title translation: Growth and slaughter performance of ‘Normand’ rabbits raised in wire mesh cages or pens]: Growth and slaughter performance of ‘Normand’ rabbits raised in wire mesh cages or pens]Google Scholar