Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T23:28:41.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of gestation management system on gilt and piglet performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

R Muns ,
EG Manzanilla ,
X Manteca  and
J Gasa
R Muns*
Affiliation:
Servei de Nutrició i Benestar Animal, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
EG Manzanilla
Affiliation:
Servei de Nutrició i Benestar Animal, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
X Manteca
Affiliation:
Servei de Nutrició i Benestar Animal, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
J Gasa
Affiliation:
Servei de Nutrició i Benestar Animal, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Individual gestation housing of pregnant sows in stalls from four weeks after mating is banned in the EU. Two experiments were conducted to study the effect of two gestation management and housing systems (STALL: gilts housed in stalls and PEN: gilts loose-housed in pens with increased feed ratio) on gilt and piglet performance during lactation. Thirty-seven PEN and 33 STALL gilts were used. Backfat, litter pre-weaning mortality and total feed intake (TFI) during lactation were recorded in gilts. Weight and rectal temperature was recorded in piglets. In Exp 1 the behaviour of a subsample of gilts was videotaped during lactation. In Exp 2 saliva cortisol in gilts, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and T4 hormones in piglet blood were measured. PEN gilts had more backfat when moved to the farrowing stalls. PEN gilts tended to have higher cortisol concentration 24 h after entering the farrowing stall and to spend more time sitting or standing up one day before parturition than STALL gilts. PEN piglets had higher bodyweight (BW) on day 0 (Exp 2) and lower T4 concentration than STALL piglets. However, STALL piglets showed higher rectal temperature 60 min after birth and lower mortality at day 2. In Exp 2, STALL piglets also had higher BW and average daily gain at weaning. During lactation, PEN gilts lost more backfat and weaned less piglets. Gilts loose-housed with increased feed ratio during gestation might be more stressed when housed in farrowing stalls than those kept in stalls during gestation, thus compromising their offsprings’ thermoregulatory capacity and growth however, from our results, it is difficult to differentiate the effect of feed level from the effect of allocation during gestation.

Keywords

animal welfaregilthousing systemmortalitypigletthermoregulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 2014 , pp. 343 - 351
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Alonso-Spilsbury, M, Ramirez-Necoechea, R, Gonzalez-Lozano, M, Mota-Rojas, D and Trujillo-Ortega, ME 2007 Piglet survival in early lactation: a review. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 6: 76–86Google Scholar
Amdi, C, Giblin, L, Hennessy, AA, Ryan, T, Stanton, C, Stickland, NC and Lawlor, PG 2013 Feed allowance and mater-nal backfat levels during gestation influence maternal cortisol levels, milk fat composition and offspring growth. Journal of Nutritional Science 2: 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2012.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anil, L, Anil, SS, Deen, J, Baidoo, SK and Wheaton, JE 2005 Evaluation of well-being, productivity, and longevity of pregnant sows housed in groups in pens with an electronic sow feeder or separately in gestation stalls. American Journal of Veterinary Research 66: 1630–1638. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, EM, Lawrence, AB and Edwards, SA 2012 Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of exis-ting farrowing and lactation systems for pigs. Animal 6: 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, EM, Jarvis, S, D’Eath, RB, Ross, DW, Robson, SK, Farish, M, Nevison, IM, Lawrence, AB and Edwards, SA 2008 Investigating the behavioural and physiological indicators of neo-natal survival in pigs. Theriogenology 69: 773–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, VE, Walker, N and Sneddon, IA 1995 Effect of rearing environment and change of environment on the behaviour of gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 57–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(96)81084-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthon, D, Herpin, P, Duchamp, C, Dauncey, MJ and Ledividich, J 1993 Modification of thermogenic capacity in neo-natal pigs by changes in thyroid status during late-gestation. Journal of Developmental Physiology 19: 253–261Google Scholar
Biensen, NJ, Von Borell, EH and Ford, SP 1996 Effects of space allocation and temperature on periparturient maternal behaviours, steroid concentrations, and piglet growth rates. Journal of Animal Science 74: 2641–2648Google ScholarPubMed
Boyle, LA, Leonard, FC, Lynch, PB and Brophy, P 2000 Influence of housing system during gestation on the behaviour and welfare of gilts in farrowing crates. Animal Science 71: 561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, GM, Simpson, GJ and Hemsworth, PH 1996 The effects of the gestation and farrowing environments on sow and piglet behaviour and piglet survival and growth in early lactation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 175–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00657-5Google Scholar
Darwish, RA and Ashmawy, TAM 2011 The impact of lambing stress on post-parturient behaviour of sheep with consequences on neonatal homeothermy and survival. Theriogenology 76: 999–1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.04.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eissen, JJ, Kanis, E and Kemp, B 2000 Sow factors affecting voluntary feed intake during lactation. Livestock Production Science 64:147–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00153-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finsten, A, Donald, A and Bate, LA 1998 Effects of prenatal maternal TRH stimulation on the postnatal ability of neonatal piglets to cope with a cold challenge. Biology of the Neonate 73:395–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000014002Google ScholarPubMed
Hampl, R, Stárka, L and Janský, L 2006 Steroids and thermo-genesis. Physiological Research 55: 123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, MJ and Gonyou, HW 1998 Increasing available space in a farrowing crate does not facilitate postural changes or maternal responses in gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 59: 285–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00142-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH 1982 Social environment and reproduction. In: Cole DJA and Foxcroft (eds) Control of Pig Production pp 585–601. Butterworths: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herpin, P, Damon, M and Le Dividich, J 2002 Development of thermoregulation and neonatal survival in pigs. Livestock Production Science 78: 25–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00183-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, J, Kirkwood, RN, Zanella, AJ and Tempelman, RJ 2007 Influence of gestation housing on sow behavior and fertility. Journal of Swine Health and Production 15: 132–136Google Scholar
Kaiser, S and Sachser, N 2001 Social stress during pregnancy and lactation affects in guinea pigs the male offsprings’ endocrine status and infantilizes their behaviour. Psychoneuroendocrinology 26:503–519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(01)00009-9Google ScholarPubMed
Kammersgaard, TS, Pedersen, LJ and JØrgensen, E 2011 Hypothermia in neonatal piglets: interactions and causes of indivi-dual differences. Journal of Animal Science 89: 2073–2085. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3022Google Scholar
Karlen, GAM, Hemsworth, PH, Gonyou, HW, Fabrega, E, Strom, AD and Smits, RJ 2007 The welfare of gestating sows in con-ventional stalls and large groups on deep litter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 105: 87–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranendonk, G, Van der Mheen, H, Fillerup, M and Hopster, H 2007 Social rank of pregnant sows affects their body weight gain and behavior and performance of the offspring. Journal of Animal Science 85: 420–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, AB, Petherick, JC, McLean, KA, Deans, LA, Chirnside, J, Gaughan, A, Clutton, E and Terlouw, EMC 1994 The effect of environment on behaviour, plasma cortisol and prolactin in parturient sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39:313–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90165-1Google Scholar
Litten, JC, Mostyn, A, Laws, J, Corson, AM, Symonds, ME and Clark, L 2008 Effect of acute administration of recombinant human leptin during the neonatal period on body temperature and endocrine profile of the piglet. Neonatology 93: 171–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000108926CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mainau, E, Dalmau, A, Luis Ruiz-de-la-Torre, J and Manteca, X 2009 Validation of an automatic system to detect position changes in puerperal sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121: 96–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, JN and Broom, DM 1993 The effects of sow housing on responses to farrowing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 81–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90053-RCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, JN and Broom, DM 1994 Effects of housing system on movement and leg strength in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 275–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90038-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, CM, Smythe, JW, Sharma, S and Meaney, MJ 1995 Sex-specific effects of prenatal stress on hypothalamic-pitui-tary-adrenal responses to stress and brain glucocorticoid recep-tor density in adult rats. Developmental Brain Research 84: 55–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(94)00153-QCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, JJ, Von Borell, EH, Deen, J, Johnson, AK, Levis, DG, Meunier-Salaün, M, Morrow, J, Reeves, D, Salak-Johnson, JL and Sundberg, PL 2004 Review: compilation of the scientific literature comparing housing systems for gestating sows and gilts using measures of physiology, behaviour, performance, and health. The Professional Animal Scientist 20: 105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NRC 1998 Nutrient Requirements of Swine. National Academic Press: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Oliviero, C, Heinonen, A, Valros, A, Halli, O and Peltoniemi, OAT 2008 Effect of the environment on the physiology of the sow during late pregnancy, farrowing and early lactation. Animal Reproduction Science 105: 365–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.015Google ScholarPubMed
Oliviero, C, Heinonen, M, Valros, A and Peltoniemi, O 2010 Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing. Animal Reproduction Science 119: 85–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, LJ and Jensen, T 2008 Effects of late introduction of sows to two farrowing environments on the progress of farro-wing and maternal behavior. Journal of Animal Science 86: 2730–2737. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0749CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, H 2011 Colostrum production by sows: variability of colostrum yield and immunoglobulin G concentrations. Animal 5:1546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175173111100070XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schenck, EL, McMunn, KA, Rosenstein, DS, Stroshine, RL, Nielsen, BD, Richert, BT, Marchant-Forde, JN and Lay, DC Jr 2008 Exercising stall-housed gestating gilts: effects on lame-ness, the musculo-skeletal system, production, and behaviour. Journal of Animal Science 86(11): 3166–3180. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, JE 2006 Thermogenic mechanisms and their hormonal regulation. Physiological Reviews 86: 435–464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00009.2005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spoolder, HAM, Geudeke, MJ, Van der Peet-Schwering, CMC and Soede, NM 2009 Group housing of sows in early pregnancy: a review of success and risk factors. Livestock Science 125: 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Kemp, B, Plagge, JG, Vereijken, PFG, den Hartog, LA, Spoolder, HAM and Verstegen, MWA 2004 Performance and individual feed intake characteristics of group-housed sows fed a nonstarch polysaccha-rides diet ad libitum during gestation over three parities. Journal of Animal Science 82: 1246–1257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wischner, D, Kemper, N, Stamer, E, Hellbruegge, B, Presuhn, U and Krieter, J 2009 Characterisation of sows’ postures and posture changes with regard to crushing piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119: 49–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H, Eastham, PR, Phillips, P and Whittemore, CT 1989 Reproductive-performance, body-weight and body condition of breeding sows with differing body fatness at parturition, differing nutrition during lactation, and differing litter size. Animal Production 48: 181–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100003901CrossRefGoogle Scholar