Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:41:21.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of cover on food consumption and growth in two freshwater fish species used in experimental studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

RJ Wootton ,
N Handisyde  and
C Rowe
RJ Wootton*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, UK
N Handisyde
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, UK
C Rowe
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To define suitable holding conditions for fish used in experimental studies on food consumption and growth, the effect of cover on growth at two ration levels was quantified for immature individuals of two common, freshwater species: the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus: Gasterosteidae) and the European minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus: Cyprinidae). In the European minnow, the presence of cover significantly increased growth rates and also the rate of food consumption at ad libitum rations; however, cover had no significant effect on the growth of the threespine stickleback. In both species, fish fed ad libitum rations had higher growth rates than fish fed 4% of body weight per day. This study illustrates the need for species specific holding conditions and illustrates an approach to welfare using measurements of traits closely related to fitness.

Keywords

animal welfareappetiteconditionEuropean minnowspecific growth ratethreespine stickleback
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , August 2006 , pp. 309 - 313
Copyright
© 2006 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ali, M and Wootton, RJ 1999 Coping with resource variability: effect of constant and variable intervals between feeding on reproductive performance at first spawning of female three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Journal of Fish Biology 55: 211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, M and Wootton, RJ 2001 Capacity for growth compensation in juvenile three-spined sticklebacks experiencing cycles of food deprivation. Journal of Fish Biology 58: 1531–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, JRM and Wootton, RJ 1982 The effect of ration and temperature on the growth of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Journal of Fish Biology 20: 401–422Google Scholar
Bell, MA and Foster, SA (eds) 1994 The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, VA and Huntingford, FA 2004 Fish and welfare: do fish have the capacity for pain perception and suffering? Animal Welfare 13, Suppl: S87-S92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Y and Wootton, RJ 1988 Bioenergetics of growth of a cyprinid, Phoxinus phoxinus (L): the effect of ration and temperature of growth rate and efficiency. Journal of Fish Biology 33: 763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P 2000a An experimental test of metabolic and behavioural responses of benthic fish species to different types of substrate. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 2336–2344Google Scholar
Fischer, P 2000b Competitive interactions for space between the two benthic fish species, burbot (Lota lota L) and stone loach (Barbatula barbatula L). Environmental Biology of Fishes 58: 439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FSBI 2002 Fish Welfare. Briefing Paper 2. Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Granta Information Systems, 82A High Street, Sawston, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Huntingford, FA, Wright, PJ and Tierney, JF 1994 Adaptive variation in antipredator behaviour in threespine stickleback. In: Bell, MA and Foster, SA (eds) The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback pp 278–296. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Mikheev, V, Metcalfe, NB, Huntingford, FA and Thorpe, JE 1994 Size-related differences in behaviour and spatial distribution of juvenile Atlantic salmon in a novel environment. Journal of Fish Biology 45: 379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peichel, CL, Nereng, KS, Ohgi, KA, Cole, BL, Colosimo, PF, Buerkle, CA, Schluter, D and Kingsley, DM 2001 The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414: 901–905Google ScholarPubMed
Peichel, CL, Ross, JA, Matson, CK, Dickson, M, Grimwood, J, Schmutz, J, Myers, RM, Mori, S, Schluter, D and Kingsley, DM 2004 The master sex-determination locus in threespine stickleback is on a nascent Y chromosome. Current Biology 14: 1416–1424Google ScholarPubMed
Quinn, GP and Keough, MJ 2002 Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, JD 2002 The neurobehavioural nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Reviews in Fisheries Science 10: 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, LG and Ross, BR 1999 Anaesthetic and Sedative Techniques for Aquatic Animals. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Russell, NR and Wootton, RJ 1992 Appetite and growth compensation in the European minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus (Cyprinidae) following short periods of deprivation. Environmental Biology of Fishes 34: 275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skov, C and Koed, A 2004 Habitat use of 0+ year pike in experimental ponds in relation to cannibalism, zooplankton, water transparency and habitat complexity. Journal of Fish Biology 64: 448–459Google Scholar
Sneddon, LU 2004 Evolution of nociception in vertebrates: comparative analysis of lower vertebrates. Brain Research Reviews 46: 123–130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneddon, LU, Braithwaite, VA and Gentle, MJ 2003 Do fish have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 270: 1115–1121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winfield, IJ and Nelson, JS 1991 Cyprinid Fishes Systematics, Biology and Exploitation. Chapman & Hall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Wootton, RJ 1976 The Biology of the Sticklebacks. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Wootton, RJ 1998 Ecology of Teleost Fishes, 2nd Edition. Kluwer: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Wright, HA, Wootton, RJ and Barber, I 2004 Inter-population variation in early growth of three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L) under laboratory conditions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 1832–1838Google Scholar