Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:53:22.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of a Moving Bait on the Behaviour of Captive Cheetahs (Acinonyx Jubatus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

B G Williams ,
N K Waran ,
J Carruthers  and
R J Young
B G Williams
Affiliation:
Edinburgh Zoo, Murrayfield, Edinburgh, EH12 6TS, UK
N K Waran
Affiliation:
ERM, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Kings Buildings, EH9 3JG, UK
J Carruthers
Affiliation:
SCAE, SAC-Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PH, UK
R J Young*
Affiliation:
Edinburgh Zoo, Murrayfield, Edinburgh, EH12 6TS, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Members of the cat family are highly motivated to hunt, but in captivity are unable to do so for a variety of reasons. This inability to hunt may reduce their welfare. In this study we used a moving bait to stimulate and release hunting motivation in two captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). Essentially our enrichment device consisted of a dead rabbit, hung from a pulley, just above the ground, moving down a 34 metre length of wire by the force of gravity. We observed the cheetahs for 140 minutes per day over three sequential food presentation periods: Baseline (10 consecutive days), Device (10 consecutive days) and Post-device (5 consecutive days). The moving bait significantly increased the frequency of sprinting (hunting) and time spent performing observations. It significantly decreased time spent in affiliation and feeding. These effects were also observed at times other than when the moving bait was presented. Thus, a moving bait allows captive cheetahs to perform ‘natural-looking’ hunting in captivity.

Keywords

animal welfarecheetahsenvironmental enrichmentexercisehunting
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , August 1996 , pp. 271 - 281
Copyright
© 1996 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Amman, K and Amman, K 1985 Cheetah. ARCO Publishing: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Beaver, B 1980 Veterinary Aspects of Feline Behaviour. Mosly: St Louis, USAGoogle Scholar
Bertram, B C R 1979 Serengeti predators and their social systems. In: Sinclair, ARE and Norton Griffiths, M (eds) Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem pp 223–248. Chicago University Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Caro, T M 1986 The functions of stötting in Thomsons’ gazelle: some tests of the predictions. Animal Behaviour 34: 663–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamove, A S 1986 Exercise improves behaviour: a rationale for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 49: 83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, M 1955 A statistical formula to quantify the ‘spread of participation’ in group discussion. Speech Monographs 22: 28–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, R L 1972 An experimental study of the predatory behaviour and feeding behaviour in the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus). Zietschrift Fur Tierpsychologie 31: 270–280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, R L 1974 The Cheetah: The Biology, Ecology, and Behaviour of an Endangered Species. Van Nostrand Reinhold: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Eaton, R L and Craig, S J 1973 Captive management and mating behaviour of the cheetah. In: Eaton, R L (ed) The Worlds Cats pp 217–254. World Wildlife Safari and Institute for the Study and Conservation of Endangered Species: Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
Eaton, R L, Shorey, D W and Yost, R 1978 The birth and development of cheetahs in a wild animal park. Zoological Garten 48: 81–93Google Scholar
Hughes, A 1977 Topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life-styles: comparative optics and retinal organisation. In: Crescitelli (ed) The Visual Systems in Vertebrates: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Volume 7 pp 613–756. Springer: Berlin, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, B O and Duncan, I J H 1988 The notion of ‘ethological need’, models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 36: 1696–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A B and Terlouw, E M C 1993 A review of behavioral-factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviours in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 2815–2825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A R 1992 Management Guidelines for the Welfare of Zoo Animals: Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus). The Federation of Zoological Gardens of Great Britain and Ireland: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Leyhausen, P 1979 Cat Behavior. Garland Inc: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Lindburg, D G 1988 Improving the feeding of captive felines through the application of field data. Zoo Biology 7: 211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindburg, D G 1991 On getting cheetahs to reproduce. Cheetah News: Cheetah Species Survival Plan Newsletter, Zoological Society of San Diego Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species: 4–5Google Scholar
Markowitz, H and LaForse, S 1987 Artificial prey as behavioural enrichment devices for felines. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 18: 31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1986 Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Mellen, J D, Stevens, V J and Markowitz, H 1981 Environmental enrichment for servals, Indian elephants and Canadian otters at Washington Park Zoo, Portland. International Zoo Yearbook 21: 196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, S J, Roelke, M E, Marker, L, Newman, A, Winkler, C A, Meltzer, D, Colly, L, Evermann, J F, Bush, M and Wildt, D E 1985 Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the cheetah. Science 227: 14281434Google ScholarPubMed
Ryan, B F, Joiner, B L and Ryan, TA 1985 Minitab Handbook, 2nd Edition. PWS-KENT Publishing Company: Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
Schaller, G B 1972 The Serengeti Lion. Chicago University Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C E and Weaver, W 1949 The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, USAGoogle Scholar
Shepherdson, D 1994 The role of environmental enrichment in the captive breeding and reintroduction of endangered species. In: Mace, G, Olney, P and Feistner, A (eds) Creative Conservation: Interactive Management of Wild and Captive Animals pp 167–177. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherdson, D, Carlstead, K, Mellen, J and Seidensticker, J 1993 The influence of food presentation on the behavior of small cats in confined environments. Zoo Biology 12: 203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, R 1976 Putting the wild back into the zoo. International Zoo News 24: 11–18Google Scholar
Stevenson, M F 1983 The captive environment: its effect on exploratory and related behavioural responses in wild animals. In: Archer, J and Birke, L (eds) Exploration in Animals and Humans pp 176–197. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Traylor-Holzer, K and Fritz, P 1985 Utilisation of space by adult and juvenile groups of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Zoo Biology 4: 115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar