Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:28:18.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does ‘playtime’ reduce stimulus-seeking and other boredom-like behaviour in laboratory ferrets?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

CC Burn ,
J Raffle  and
JK Bizley
CC Burn*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Ethics, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK
J Raffle
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Ethics, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK
JK Bizley
Affiliation:
Ear Institute, University College London, 332 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Much environmental enrichment for laboratory animals is intended to enhance animal welfare and normalcy by providing stimulation to reduce ‘boredom’. Behavioural manifestations of boredom include restless sensation-seeking behaviours combined with indicators of sub-optimal arousal. Here, we explored whether these signs could be reduced by extra daily play opportunity in laboratory ferrets (Mustela putorius furo). Specifically, we hypothesised that playtime would reduce restlessness, aggression, sensation-seeking and awake drowsiness, even 24 h later in the home-cage. Female ferrets (n = 14) were group-housed in enriched multi-level cages. Playtime involved exploring a room containing a ball pool, paper bags, balls containing bells, and a familiar interactive human for 1 h. This was repeated on three consecutive mornings, and on the fourth, home-cage behaviour was compared between ferrets which had experienced the playtime treatment versus control cage-mates which had not. Their investigation of stimuli (positive = mouse odour or ball; ambiguous = empty bottle or tea-strainer; and negative = peppermint or bitter apple odour) was also recorded. We then swapped treatments, creating a paired experimental design. Ferrets under control conditions lay awake with their eyes open and screeched significantly more, but slept and sat/stood less, than following playtime. They also contacted negative and ambiguous stimuli for significantly longer under control conditions than following playtime; contact with positive stimuli showed no effects. Attempts to blind the observer to treatments were unsuccessful, so replication is required, but the findings suggest that playtime may have reduced both sub-optimal arousal and restless sensation-seeking behaviour, consistent with reducing boredom.

Keywords

animal welfareboredomenvironmental enrichmentexplorationferretslaboratory animals
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 19 - 29
Copyright
© 2020 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Adams, KM, Navarro, AM, Hutchinson, EK and Weed, JL 2004 A canine socialization and training program at the National Institutes of Health. Lab Animal 33: 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0104-32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahloy-Dallaire, J, Espinosa, J and Mason, G 2018 Play and optimal welfare: Does play indicate the presence of positive affective states? Behavioural Processes 156: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, RC and Wood, JB 2001 Enrichment for giant Pacific octopuses: Happy as a clam? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 4: 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0402_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, K and Würbel, H 2014 The impact of environmental enrichment on the outcome variability and scientific validity of laboratory animal studies. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 33: 273–280. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2282Google ScholarPubMed
Bennett, JC, McRae, PA, Levy, LJ and Frick, KM 2006 Long-term continuous, but not daily, environmental enrichment reduces spatial memory decline in aged male mice. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 85: 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2005.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlyne, DE 1960 Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity pp 144–192. McGraw-Hill: New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1037/11164-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, SW, Zingg, BM and Lightfoot, TL 2001 Behavior of Mustela putorius furo (the domestic ferret). Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 4: 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1094-9194(17)30032-4Google ScholarPubMed
Burghardt, GM 1984 On the origins of play. In: Smith, PK (ed) Play in Animals and Humans pp 5–41. Blackwell: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Burghardt, GM 2014 A brief glimpse at the long evolutionary history of play. Animal Behavior and Cognition 1: 90–98. https://doi.org/10.12966/abc.05.01.2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burn, CC 2017 Bestial boredom: a biological perspective on ani-mal boredom and suggestions for its scientific investigation. Animal Behaviour 130: 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbe-hav.2017.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, B, Abney, D and Skoumbordis, E 2007 A playroom as novel swine enrichment. Lab Animal 36: 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0307-32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celli, ML, Tomonaga, M, Udono, T, Teramoto, M and Nagano, K 2003 Tool use task as environmental enrichment for captive chimpanzees. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00257-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamove, AS 1989 Environmental enrichment: A review. Animal Technology 40: 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.40.1.155Google Scholar
Dwan, K, Gamble, C, Williamson, PR and Kirkham, JJ 2013 Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias — An updated review. PLoS One 8: e66844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066844CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastwood, JD, Frischen, A, Fenske, MJ and Smilek, D 2012 The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612456044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahlman, SA, Mercer-Lynn, KB, Flora, DB and Eastwood, JD 2013 Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale. Assessment 20: 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111421303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanelli, D 2010 Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data. PLoS One 5: e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galef, BG and Whiskin, EE 2003 Preference for novel flavors in adult Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 117: 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.117.1.86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galef, BG and Whiskin, EE 2005 Differences between golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegi-cus) in preference for the sole diet that they are eating. Journal of Comparative Psychology 119: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, SDE and Špinka, M 2011 Animal play and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 81: 891–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbe-hav.2011.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, J, Siebert, K and Nürnberg, G 2009 On the use of an automated learning device by group-housed dwarf goats: Do goats seek cognitive challenges? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120: 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manteuffel, G, Langbein, J and Puppe, B 2009 From operant learning to cognitive enrichment in farm animal housing: bases and applicability. Animal Welfare 18: 87–95Google Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 2007 Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. pp 1–171. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ and Burn, CC 2011 Chapter 7: Behavioural restriction. In: Appleby, MC, Mench, JA, Olsson, A and Hughes, BO (ed) Animal Welfare pp 98–119. CABI Publishing: UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936594.0098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, RK 2019 Is boredom an animal welfare concern? Animal Welfare 28: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, RK, Campbell, DLM, Dallaire, JA, Díez-León, M, Palme, R and Mason, GJ 2013 Sleeping tight or hiding in fright? The welfare implications of different subtypes of inactivity in mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144: 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, RK, Campbell, DL and Mason, GJ 2017 Effects of enrichment on boredom-like states in mink and their behavioural correlates: a replicate. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 197: 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, RK and Mason, GJ 2012 Environmental enrichment reduces signs of boredom in caged mink. PLoS One 7: e49180. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehan, CL and Mench, JA 2007 The challenge of challenge: Can problem solving opportunities enhance animal welfare? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, RC 1995 Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00616-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson-Kane, EG 2001 Environmental enrichment for labo-ratory rats: a review. Animal Technology 52: 77–84Google Scholar
Pereira, LO, Arteni, NS, Petersen, RC, da Rocha, AP, Achaval, M and Netto, CA 2007 Effects of daily environmental enrichment on memory deficits and brain injury following neona-tal hypoxia-ischemia in the rat. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 87: 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2006.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puppe, B, Ernst, K, Schön, PC and Manteuffel, G 2007 Cognitive enrichment affects behavioural reactivity in domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 105: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reijgwart, ML, Vinke, CM, Hendriksen, CFM, van der Meer, M, Schoemaker, NJ and van Zeeland, YRA 2017 Ferrets’(Mustela putorius furo) enrichment priorities and preferences as determined in a seven-chamber consumer demand study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 180: 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennie, A and Buchanan-Smith, H 2006 Refinement of the use of non-human primates in scientific research. Part II: housing, hus-bandry and acquisition. Animal Welfare 15: 215Google Scholar
Swaisgood, RR and Shepherdson, DJ 2005 Scientific approach-es to enrichment and stereotypies in zoo animals: what's been done and where should we go next? Zoo Biology 24: 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Town, SM, Brimijoin, WO and Bizley, JK 2017 Egocentric and allocentric representations in auditory cortex. PLoS Biology 15: e2001878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001878CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuyttens, FAM, de Graaf, S, Heerkens, JLT, Jacobs, L, Nalon, E, Ott, S, Stadig, L, Van Laer, E and Ampe, B 2014 Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe? Animal Behaviour 90: 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, DL 2004 A review of environmental enrichment for ken-nelled dogs, Canis familiaris. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85:307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, DL 2009 Sensory stimulation as environmental enrich-ment for captive animals: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F 2005 Animal boredom: understanding the tedi-um of confined lives. In: McMillan, FD (ed) Mental Health And Well-Being In Animals pp 79–93. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Widman, DR and Rosellini, RA 1990 Restricted daily exposure to environmental enrichment increases the diversity of explo-ration. Physiology & Behavior 47: 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(90)90042-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M, Warren, J and Abbott, L 1965 Infantile stimulation, activity, and learning by cats. Child Development 36: 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1965.tb05343.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, TD, Reinhard, DA, Westgate, EC, Gilbert, DT, Ellerbeck, N, Hahn, C, Brown, CL and Shaked, A 2014 Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind. Science 345: 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250830CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed