Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:21:56.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A cross-sectional study of prevalence and risk factors for foot lesions and abnormal posture in lactating sows on commercial farms in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

AL KilBride
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
CE Gillman
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
LE Green*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A cross-sectional study of lactating sows in 71 commercial pig herds in England was carried out to estimate the prevalence of foot lesions and abnormal posture and investigate the associated risks. Observational data were collected on the standing posture, lesions on the hind left foot, and the pen the sow was housed in for 233 sows. The prevalence of foot lesions was 76.8% and 10.8% of lactating sows had abnormal posture. Sows housed on slatted floors during pregnancy had an associated increased risk of heel flaps but a reduced risk of toe erosion, compared with sows housed on solid concrete floors with bedding during pregnancy. There was an increased risk of abnormal posture in lactating sows housed on slatted floors during pregnancy compared with those housed on solid concrete floors with straw bedding during pregnancy. In addition, there was an increased risk of abnormal posture in lactating sows with wounds on the limbs and erosions on the toe and the heel/sole. The positive association between abnormal posture and foot lesions suggests that these lesions might be painful. Housing sows on solid floors during pregnancy might reduce the risk of abnormal posture, and certain foot lesions, in sows during lactation. However, posture is a less sensitive measure of lameness than gait, and the nature of the causal relationship between foot lesions and lameness requires further investigation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anil, SS, Anil, L and Deen, J 2005 Evaluation of patterns of removal and associations among culling because of lameness and sow productivity traits in swine breeding herds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226: 956961CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anil, S, Anil, L, Deen, J, Baidoo, S and Walker, R 2007 Factors associated with claw lesions in gestating sows. Journal of Swine Health and Production 15: 7883Google Scholar
Barker, Z, Amory, J, Wright, J, Blowey, R and Green, L 2009 Risk Factors for increased rates of sole ulcer, white line disease and digital dermatitis in dairy cattle from 27 farms in England and Wales. Journal of Dairy Science 92(5): 19711978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonde, M, Rousing, TJ, Badsberg, H and S⊘rensen, JT 2004 Associations between lying-down behaviour problems and body condition, limb disorders and skin lesions of lactating sows housed in farrowing crates in commercial sow herds. Livestock Production Science 87: 179187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonser, RHC 1995 Melanin and the abrasion resistance of feathers. Condor 97: 590591Google Scholar
Boyle, L, Leonard, FC, Lynch, B and Brophy, P 1998 Sow culling patterns and sow welfare. Irish Veterinary Journal incorporating Irish Veterinary Times 517: 354357Google Scholar
Defra 1998 Condition Scoring of Pigs PB 3480. Defra Publications: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Dewey, CE, Friendship, RM and Wilson, MR 2003 Clinical and postmorten examination of sows culled for lameness. Canadian Veterinary Journal 34: 555556Google Scholar
Dohoo, I, Martin, W and Stryhn, H 2003 Veterinary Epidemiological Research. Publisher AVC: Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Engblom, L, Lundeheim, N, Dalin, AM and Andersson, K 2007 Sow removal in Swedish commercial herds. Livestock Science 106: 7686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, CE, KilBride, AL, Ossent, P and Green, LE 2009 A cross-sectional study of the prevalence, risk factors and population attributable fractions for foot lesions in post weaning pigs from 90 commercial farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 91(2): 146152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjein, H and Larssen, RB 1995a The effect of claw lesions and claw infections on lameness in loose housing of pregnant sows. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 36: 451459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjein, H and Larssen, RB 1995b Housing of pregnant sows in loose and confined systems - a field study. 3. The impact of housing factors on claw lesions. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 36: 443450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjein, H and Larssen, RB 1995c Housing of pregnant sows in loose and confined systems - a field study. 2. Claw lesions: morphology, prevalence, location and relation to age. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 36: 433442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinonen, M, Oravainen, J, Orro, T, Seppa-Lassila, L, Ala-Kurikka, E, Virolainen, J, Tast, A and Peltoniemi, OAT 2006 Lameness and fertility of sows and gilts in randomly selected loose-housed herds in Finland. The Veterinary Record 159: 383387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
J⊘rgensen, B 2000 Osteochondrosis/osteoarthrosis and claw disorders in sows, associated with leg weakness. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 41: 123138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J⊘rgensen, B 2003 Influence of floor type and stocking density on leg weakness, osteochondrosis and claw disorders in slaughter pigs. Animal Science 77: 439449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KilBride, AL, Gillman, CE and Green, LE 2009a A cross-sectional study of prevalence of lameness in finishing pigs, gilts and pregnant sows and associations with limb lesions and floor type on commercial farms in England. Animal Welfare 18(3): 215224Google Scholar
KilBride, AL, Gillman, CE and Green, LE 2009b A cross-sectional study of prevalence, risk factors and population attributable fractions for limb and body lesions in lactating sows on commercial farms in England. BMC Veterinary Research 5(30): doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-30Google Scholar
KilBride, AL, Gillman, CE, Ossent, P and Green, LE 2009c Impact of flooring on the health and welfare of pigs. In Practice 31: 390395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, RK, J⊘rgensen, B and Jensen, HE 2008 The impact of elbow and knee joint lesions on abnormal gait and posture of sows. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 50(5): doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-50-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, RK, Svensmark, B, Ellegaard, LP and Jensen, HE 2005 Locomotive disorders associated with sow mortality in Danish pig herds. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A52: 423428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knauer, M, Stalder, KJ, Karriker, L, Baas, TJ, Johnson, C, Serenius, T, Layman, L and McKean, JD 2007 A descriptive survey of lesions from cull sows harvested at two Midwestern US facilities. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 82: 198212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kronegay, ET and Lindemann, MD 1984 Floor surfaces and flooring materials for pigs. Pig News and Information 5(4): 351357Google Scholar
Kroneman, A, Vellenga, L, van der Wilt, FJ and Vermeer, HM 1993a Field research on veterinary problems in group-housed sows-a survey of lamenes. Zentralblatt Fur Veterinarmedizin Reige A40: 704712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroneman, A, Vellenga, L, van der Wilt, FJ and Vermeer, HM 1993b Review of health problems in group housed sows, with special emphasis on lameness. Veterinary Quarterly 15: 2629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucia, TJ, Dial, G and Marsh, WE 2000 Lifetime reproductive performance in female pigs having distinct reasons of removal. Livestock Production Science 63: 213222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, DCJ, Clegg, J, Spatz, A and Green, LE 2000 Repeatability of a lameness scoring system for finishing pigs. The Veterinary Record 147: 547576CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouttotou, N, Hatchell, FM and Green, LE 1999 Foot lesions in finishing pigs and their associations with the type of floor. The Veterinary Record 144: 629631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouttotou, N, Hatchell, FM, Lundervold, M and Green, LE 1997 Prevalence and distribution of foot lesions in finishing pigs in south-west England. The Veterinary Record 141: 115120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penny, RHC 1979 Genetical, physiological and anatomical factors contributing to foot and limb disorders in growing and adult pigs including a statistical review of foot and limb disorders in pigs attributable to floors. The Pig Journal 4: 8596Google Scholar
Rasbash, J, Browne, W, Goldstein, H, Yang, M, Plewis, I, Healy, M, Woodhouse, G, Draper, D, Langford, I and Lewis, T 2000 A Users Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.1, Multilevel Models Project. University of London: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Ritter, LA, Xue, JL, Dial, GD, Morrison, RB and Marsh, WE 1999 Prevalence of lesions and body condition scores among female swine at slaughter. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 214(4): 525-528Google Scholar
Scott, K, Chennells, DJ, Campbell, FM, Hunt, B, Armstrong, D, Taylor, L, Gill, BP and Edwards, SA 2006 The welfare of finishing pigs in two contrasting housing systems: fully-slatted versus straw-bedded accommodation. Livestock Science 103: 104115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Berner, H, Hermans, W and Papsthard, E 1990 Diseases of the hind legs on pigs with regard to bursitis and their relation to the type of floor. Berliner und Munichener Tierarztliche Woschenschrift 103: 5160Google Scholar
Webb, NG, Penny, RHC and Johnston, AM 1984 Effect of a dietary supplement of biotin on pig hoof horn strength and hardness. The Veterinary Record 114: 185189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whay, H, Main, D, Green, L and Webster, A 2003 Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigations of farm records. The Veterinary Record 153: 197202CrossRefGoogle Scholar