Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:47:41.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of indoor and captive, free-roaming management in golden-headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) at Zürich Zoo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

HW Steinmetz*
Affiliation:
Chester Zoo, Caughall Road, Upton-by-Chester CH2 1LH, UK Clinic for Zoo Animals. Exotic Pets and Wildlife, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
R Zingg
Affiliation:
Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 268, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland; Zürich Zoo, Zürichbergsrasse 221, 8044 Zürich, Switzerland
P Ossent
Affiliation:
Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 268, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
U Eulenberger
Affiliation:
Clinic for Zoo Animals. Exotic Pets and Wildlife, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
M Clauss
Affiliation:
Clinic for Zoo Animals. Exotic Pets and Wildlife, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
JM Hatt
Affiliation:
Clinic for Zoo Animals. Exotic Pets and Wildlife, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Traditional husbandry practices for the public display of Callitrichidae involve strict separation of animals and public. An important consideration for the evaluation of such management is the occurrence of health problems and potential zoonotic risks. This study compared animal data and veterinary records from a captive, free-roaming population of golden-headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) with a population housed under indoor management. The captive, free-roaming group grew significantly faster than the indoor-housed group, as less animals died and offspring were more successfully weaned. No differences in the causes of death were detected between the two husbandry practices. However, bacterial diseases were most common and diagnosed significantly more often under indoor management. This study suggests that the captive, free-roaming management of golden-headed lion tamarins can be conducive to increased reproductive success, improved health and improved welfare. Therefore, current husbandry recommendations for captive, free-roaming conditions were supported by the findings of the present study as a valuable housing practice where health regulations and proper husbandry parameters permit.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2011 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Brown, W 2002 The benefits of physical activity during pregnancy. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 5(1): 3745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan-Smith, HM, Prescott, MJ and Cross, NJ 2004 What factors should determine cage sizes for primates in the laboratory? Animal Welfare 13S: 197201Google Scholar
Carroll, JB 2002 EAZA Husbandry Guidelines for the Callitrichidae. European Association of Zoos and Aquaria: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Clapp, JF 2000 Exercise during pregnancy: a clinical update. Clinical Sports Medicine 19(2): 273286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galbusera, P 2008 Golden-headed Lion Tamarin Studbook (Leontopithecus chrysomelas). International Species Information System. International Studbook Library: Eagen, MN, USAGoogle Scholar
Hatt, JM, Grest, P, Posthaus, H and Bossart, W 2004 Serologic survey in a colony of captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) after infection with herpes simplex type 1-like virus. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 35(3): 387390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoelzle, LE, Corboz, L, Ossent, P and Wittenbrink, MM 2004 Tularaemia in a captive golden-headed lion tamarin (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) in Switzerland. Veterinary Record 155(2): 6061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchon, DJR 2006 Calculator for survival probability (the Kaplan-Meier method). http://www.hutchon.net/Kaplan-Meier.htm. (Accessed 18.03.2008)Google Scholar
Mallinson, J 1977 Acclimatisation of tropical mammals in the northern hemisphere with special reference to the family Callitrichidae. Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust Annual Report 14: 3440Google Scholar
Miller, GF, Barnard, DE, Woodward, RA, Flynn, BM and Bulte, JW 1997 Hepatic haemosiderosis in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus: effect of diet on incidence and severity. Laboratory Animal Science 47(2):138-142Google Scholar
Montali, RJ and Bush, M 1999 Diseases of the Callitrichidae. In: Fowler ME and Miller RE (eds). Zoo and Wildlife Medicine: Current Therapy, 4th Edition pp 369376. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Morris, SN and Johnson, NR 2005 Exercise during pregnancy: a critical appraisal of the literature. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 50(3): 181188Google ScholarPubMed
Prescott, MJ and Buchanan-Smith, HM 2004 Cage sizes for tamarins in the laboratory. Animal Welfare 13: 151158Google Scholar
Price, E, Feistner, ATC, Carroll, B and Young, JA 1989 Establishment of a free-ranging group of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) at the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust. Dodo, Journal Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust 26: 6069Google Scholar
Raboy, BE and Dietz, JM 2004 Diet, foraging, and use of space in wild golden-headed lion tamarins. American Journal of Primatology 63(1): 115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinmetz, HW, Kaumanns, W, Dix, I, Heistermann, M, Fox, M and Kaup, FJ 2006 Coat condition, housing condition and measurement of faecal cortisol metabolites: a non-invasive study about alopecia in captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Medical Primatology 35(1): 311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed