Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:00:18.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical pathology and cardiovascular parameters are not influenced by housing rats under increased environmental complexity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

LF Mikkelsen ,
DB S⊘rensen ,
T Krohn ,
B Lauritzen ,
N Dragsted ,
AK Hansen  and
JL Ottesen
LF Mikkelsen*
Affiliation:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Park, DK-2760 Mål⊘v, Denmark Centre for Applied Laboratory Animal Research (CALAR), www.en.calar.dk
DB S⊘rensen
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Laboratory Animal Research (CALAR), www.en.calar.dk Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 88, Gr⊘nnegårdsvej 15, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
T Krohn
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Laboratory Animal Research (CALAR), www.en.calar.dk Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 88, Gr⊘nnegårdsvej 15, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
B Lauritzen
Affiliation:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Park, DK-2760 Mål⊘v, Denmark Centre for Applied Laboratory Animal Research (CALAR), www.en.calar.dk
N Dragsted
Affiliation:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Park, DK-2760 Mål⊘v, Denmark Centre for Applied Laboratory Animal Research (CALAR), www.en.calar.dk
AK Hansen
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Laboratory Animal Research (CALAR), www.en.calar.dk Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 88, Gr⊘nnegårdsvej 15, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
JL Ottesen
Affiliation:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Park, DK-2760 Mål⊘v, Denmark Centre for Applied Laboratory Animal Research (CALAR), www.en.calar.dk
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since the release of the revised Appendix A from the Council of Europe for housing of laboratory animals there have been claims that laboratory animals should be housed under more complex conditions; known popularly as enrichment. A number of studies have expressed concerns that this may increase uncontrollable variation in the animals, thereby creating the need for greater numbers of animals. Within neurobiology there would appear to be a scientific basis for such concern. However, even though this may be used as an argument for denying the animal environmental enrichment, it is unclear whether there is any basis for concern within other research areas. The aim of this study, therefore, was to explore whether clinical pathology and cardiovascular parameters were influenced by housing rats under environmentally enriched conditions. Male, Sprague-Dawley rats were housed under three different regimes: non-enriched, standard-enriched (according to the guidelines of the Council of Europe) and extra-enriched with a shelf and higher cages. All housing forms were based upon commercially available, standardised equipment. A total of 41 different parameters were monitored via clinical pathology, telemetry and coagulation tests and virtually no differences were observed in relation to the manner in which the rats were housed. The uncontrollable variation observed in our study was compared to within-strain variation data supplied from the breeder and was relatively low in all three types of housing. We conclude, based upon our studies in male, Sprague-Dawley rats, that so far there is no basis for concern that enriched housing will lead to increased group sizes when using animals for research within this field and, as such, there is no reason not to enrich the environment of such rats.

Keywords

animal welfareclinical pathologyenvironmental enrichmenthousing conditionsratstelemetry
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , November 2010 , pp. 449 - 460
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Augustsson, H, van de Weerd, HA, Kruitwagen, CLJJ and Baumans, V 2003 Effects of enrichment on variation and results in the light/dark test. Laboratory Animals 37: 328–340Google Scholar
Baumans, V 2005 Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: requirements of rodents, rabbits, and research. ILAR Journal 46: 162–170Google ScholarPubMed
Bayne, K 2005 Potential for unintended consequences of environmental enrichment for laboratory animals and research results. ILAR Journal 46: 129–139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benefiel, AC, Dong, WK and Greenough, WT 2005 Mandatory ‘enriched’ housing of laboratory animals: the need for evidence-based evaluation. ILAR Journal 46: 95–105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanchard, RJ and Blanchard, DC 2003 Bringing natural behaviors into the laboratory: a tribute to Paul MacLean. Physiology & Behavior 79: 515–524Google ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe 2006 European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (ETS 123), revised Appendix A. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
Eskola, S, Lauhikari, M, Voipio, HM and Nevalainen, T 1999 The use of aspen blocks and tubes to enrich the cage environment of laboratory rats. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 26: 1–10Google Scholar
Garner, JP 2005 Stereotypies and other abnormal repetitive behaviors: potential impact on validity, reliability, and replicability of scientific outcomes. ILAR Journal 46: 106–117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, AK, Baumans, V, Elliott, H, Francis, R, Holgate, B, Hubrecht, RC, Jennings, M, Peters, A and Stauffacher, M 2002 Future principles for housing and care of laboratory rodents and rabbits. Report for the revision of the Council of Europe Convention ETS 123 appendix A for rodents and rabbits. PART A. 2002. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France. http://www.coe.int/T/E/Legal_affairs/Legal_co-operation/Biological_safety,_use_of_animals/Laboratory_animals/GT1 23(2000)57rodents-rabbits.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, E, Avery, A and Van de Woude, S 2005 Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents. ILAR Journal 46: 148–161Google ScholarPubMed
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources 1996 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Commission on Life Sciences. National Academy Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Jones, TA and Greenough, WT 1996 Ultrastructural evidence for increased contact between astrocytes and synapses in rats reared in a complex environment. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 65: 48–56Google Scholar
Krohn, TC, Mikkelsen, LF, S⊘rensen, DB, Haagensen, AMJ, Hansen, AK and Ottesen, JL 2010 The ability of SD-rats to distinguish between three different housing environments. Scandinavian Journal Laboratory Animal Science, submittedGoogle Scholar
Lewejohann, L, Reinhard, C, Schrewe, A, Brandewiede, J, Haemisch, A, Görtz, N, Schachner, M and Sachser, N 2006 Environmental bias? Effects of housing conditions, laboratory environment and experimenter on behavioral tests. Genes, Brain and Behavior 5: 64–72Google ScholarPubMed
Mering, S, Kaliste-Korhonen, E and Nevalainen, T 2001 Estimates of appropriate number of rats: interaction with housing environment. Laboratory Animals 35: 80–90Google ScholarPubMed
Newberry, RC 1995 Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottesen, JL, Weber, A, Gurtler, H and Mikkelsen, LF 2004 New housing conditions: improving the welfare of experimental animals. Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals 32: 397–404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, SH, Garner, JP and Würbel, H 2009 Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments? Nature Methods 6: 257–261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, WMS and Burch, RL 1959 The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen & Co Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, NCA, Bahr, NI, Weiss, IC and Würbel, H 2002 Dissociable effects of isolation rearing and environmental enrichment on exploration, spatial learning and HPA activity in adult rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 73: 209–224CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrijver, NCA, Pallier, PN, Brown, VJ and Würbel, H 2004 Double dissociation of social and environmental stimulation on spatial learning and reversal learning in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 152: 307–314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, AL and Corrow, DJ 2005 Modifications to husbandry and housing conditions of laboratory rodents for improved well-being. ILAR Journal 46: 140–147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
S⊘rensen, DB, Mikkelsen, LF, Nielsen, SG, Ersb⊘ll, AK and Krohn, TC 2010 The influence of three standardised enriched environments on learning and memory in group-housed SD rats. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science, in pressGoogle Scholar
S⊘rensen, DB, Ottesen, JL and Hansen, AK 2004 Consequences of enhancing environmental complexity for laboratory rodents: a review with emphasis on the rat. Animal Welfare 13: 193–204Google Scholar
Stauffacher, M, Peters, A, Jennings, M, Hubrecht, RC, Holgate, B, Francis, R, Elliott, H, Baumans, V and Hansen, AK 2002 Future principles for housing and care of laboratory rodents and rabbits. Report for the revision of the Council of Europe Convention ETS 123 Appendix A for rodents and rabbits. PART B. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
Tsai, PP, Stelzer, HD, Hedrich, HJ and Hackbarth, H 2003 Are the effects of different enrichment designs on the physiology and behaviour of DBA/2 mice consistent? Laboratory Animals 37: 314–327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Weerd, HA, Aarsen, EL, Mulder, A, Kruitwagen, CLJJ, Hendriksen, CFM and Baumans, V 2002 Effects of environmental enrichment for mice: variation in experimental results. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5: 109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Weerd, HA, van Loo, PLP and Baumans, V 2004 Environmental enrichment: room for reduction? Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals 32: 69–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weed, JL and Raber, JM 2005 Balancing animal research with animal well-being: establishment of goals and harmonization of approaches. ILAR Journal 46: 118–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfer, DP, Litvin, O, Morf, S, Nitsch, RM, Lipp, HP and Würbel, H 2004 Cage enrichment and mouse behaviour test responses by laboratory mice are unperturbed by more entertaining housing. Nature 432: 821–822Google Scholar
Würbel, H and Garner, JP 2007 Refinement of Rodent Research Through Environmental Enrichment and Systematic Randomization. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research: London, UK. www.nc3rs.org.ukGoogle Scholar