Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:05:06.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Benefits of positive human interaction for socially housed chimpanzees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

KC Baker
KC Baker*
Affiliation:
Tulane National Primate Research Center, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, Louisiana 70433, USA
*
[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Human interaction as environmental enrichment for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other primates is widely promoted and believed to be of value, but has been subject to little objective evaluation. This study assessed the effects of positive human interaction (eg relaxed treat feeding, playing, and other forms of social interaction compatible with personnel safety) on the behaviour of adult chimpanzees. Subjects were housed indoors in groups of two or three individuals. The level of interaction during routine care and management (ie in the process of cleaning, feeding, and monitoring) represented the baseline condition. The test condition involved a familiar caretaker spending an additional 10 mins per day, 5 days a week, with each chimpanzee. This study was designed to assess carry-over effects of interaction on behaviour outside the context of care staff presence. Therefore, in all phases of the study, data (97 h of focal animal sampling) were collected only when caretakers were absent from the building. During the increased human interaction phase, the chimpanzees groomed each other more and showed lower levels of the following behaviours: regurgitation/reingestion, other oral abnormal behaviours, inactivity, and reactivity to the displays of neighbouring groups. A trend towards reduced agonistic display was also detected. Attempted interactions with the observer shifted significantly from predominantly aggressive to predominantly affiliative in nature. These results suggest that simple, unstructured affiliation between humans and chimpanzees should be a valued component of behavioural management.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural disorderscaptive managementchimpanzeesenvironmental enrichmenthuman interaction
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 2004 , pp. 239 - 245
Copyright
© 2004 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Altmann, J 1974 Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, K C 1996 Chimpanzees in single cages and small social groups: effects on behaviour and well-being. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 35: 61–64Google Scholar
Baker, K C 1997 Straw and forage ameliorate abnormal behaviours in adult chimpanzees. Zoo Biology 16: 225–2363.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, K C and Aureli, F 1996 The neighbour effect: other groups influence intragroup agonistic behaviour in captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 40: 283–2913.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, K C and Aureli, F 1997 Behavioural indicators of anxiety: an empirical test in chimpanzees. Behaviour 134: 1031–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, K, Bloomsmith, M, Griffis, C and Gierhart, M 2003 Self-injurious behavior and response to human interaction as enrichment in rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 60: 94–95Google Scholar
Baker, K C and Ross, S K 1998 Outdoor access: the behavioural benefits to chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 45: 166 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Baker, K and Easley, S 1996 Regurgitation and reingestion in captive chimpanzees. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, K, Dexter, S L, Mainzer, H, McCully, C, Campbell, G and Yamada, F 1992 The use of artificial turf as a foraging substrate for individually housed rhesus monkeys (Rococo mulatta). Animal Welfare 1: 39–53Google Scholar
Bayne, K A, Dexter, S L and Strange, G 1993 The effects of food treat provisioning and human interaction on the behavioural well-being of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 32: 6–9Google Scholar
Bennett, B T 1990 Alternative methodologies. In: Bennett, B T, Brown, M J and Schofield, J C (eds) Essentials for Animal Research: A Primer for Research Personnel pp 13–25. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library: Beltsville, USAGoogle Scholar
Birke, L 2002 Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang utans. Animal Welfare 11: 189–202Google Scholar
Bloomsmith, M A, Alford, P L and Maple, T L 1988 Successful feeding enrichment for captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 16: 155–164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomsmith, M A, Baker, K C, Ross, S K and Lambeth, S P 1999 Comparing animal training to non-training human interaction as environmental enrichment for chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 49: 35–36 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Bloomsmith, M A, Laule, G E, Alford, P L and Thurston, R H 1994 Using training to moderate chimpanzee aggression during feeding. Zoo Biology 13: 557–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomsmith, M A, Stone, A M and Laule, G E 1998 Positive reinforcement training to enhance the voluntary movement of group-housed chimpanzees within their enclosure. Zoo Biology 17: 333–3413.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boinski, S, Gross, T S and Davis, J K 1999 Terrestrial predator alarm vocalizations are a valid monitor of stress in captive brown capuchins (Cebus apella). Zoo Biology 15: 295–3123.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C S and Loskutoff, N M 1998 A training program for noninvasive semen collection in captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Zoo Biology 17: 143–1513.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, C E, Rupniak, N M J and Iversen, S D 1988 Effects of different environmental enrichment devices on cage stereotypies and autoaggression in captive cynomolgus monkeys. Journal of Medical Primatology 17: 257–269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caine, N G 1992 Humans as predators: observational studies and the risk of pseudohabituation. In: Davis, H and Balfour, D (eds) The Inevitable Bond: Examining Scientist-Animal Interactions pp 357–364. Cambridge University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K and Seidensticker, J 1991 Seasonal variation in stereotypic pacing in an American black bear Ursus americanus. Behavioural Processes 25: 155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosey, G R 2000 Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect? Animal Welfare 9: 343–357Google Scholar
Kessel-Davenport, A L and Gutierrez, T 1994 Training captive chimpanzees for movement in a transport box. The Newsletter 6: I -2 Lambeth S P, Bloomsmith M A and Alford P L 1997 Effects of human activity on chimpanzee wounding. Zoo Biology 16: 327–333Google Scholar
Lambeth, S P, Perlman, J E and Schapiro, S J 2000 Positive reinforcement training paired with videotape exposure decreases training time investment for a complicated task in female chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 51: 79–80Google Scholar
(Abstract) Laule, G E, Thurston, R H, Alford, P L and Bloomsmith, M A 1996 Training to reliably obtain blood and urine samples from a diabetic chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Zoo Biology 15: 587–5913.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Line, S W, Morgan, K N, Markowitz, H and Strong, S 1989 Heart rate and activity of rhesus monkeys in response to routine events. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 28: 9–12Google Scholar
Mahoney, C J 1992 Some thoughts on psychological enrichment. Lab Animal 21: 27–37Google Scholar
Maki, S, Alford, P L and Bramblett, C 1987 The effects of unfamiliar humans on aggression in captive chimpanzee groups. American Journal of Primatology 12: 358 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Malinow, M R, Hill, J D and Ochsner, A J 1974 Heart rate in caged rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Laboratory Animal Science 24: 537–540Google ScholarPubMed
Manuck, S B, Kaplan, J R and Clarkson, T B 1983 Behavioural induced heart rate reactivity and atherosclerosis in cynomolgus monkeys. Psychosomatic Medicine 45: 95–108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markowitz, H and Spinelli, J S 1986 Environmental engineering for primates. In: Benirschke, K (ed) Primates: The Road to Self-Sustaining Populations pp 480–498. Springer: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
National Research Council 1996 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy Press: Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuijsen, K and de Waal, F B M 1988 Effects of spatial crowding on social behavior in a chimpanzee colony. Zoo Biology 1: 5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, M A and Drewsen, K H 1989 Enriching the lives of captive primates: issues and problems. In: Segal, E F (ed) Housing, Care and Psychological Well-Being of Captive and Laboratory Primates pp 161–182. Noyes Publications: Park Ridge, USAGoogle Scholar
Perlman, J E, Boudreau, B A and Schapiro, S J 2000 Positive reinforcement training and group-housed rhesus macaques: a look at training time investment and potential benefits. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 29: 68 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Perlman, J, Guhad, F A, Lambeth, S, Fleming, T, Lee, D, Martin, M and Schapiro, S 2001 Using positive reinforcement training techniques to facilitate the assessment of parasites in captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 54: 56 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1997a Training nonhuman primates to cooperate during blood collection: a review. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 36: 1–4Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1997b Training nonhuman primates to cooperate during handling procedures: a review. Animal Technology 48: 55–73Google Scholar
Rice, T R, Harvey, H, Kayhart, R and Torres, C 1999 Comparison of two chimpanzee housing configurations. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 38: 9Google Scholar
Wolfle, T L 1987 Control of stress using non-drug approaches. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 191: 1219–1221Google ScholarPubMed
Wolfle, T L 1996 How different species affect the relationship. In: Krulisch, L, Mayer, S and Simmonds, R C (eds) The Human/Research Animal Relationship pp 85–91. Scientists Center for Animal Welfare: Greenbelt, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
Wood, W 1998 Interactions among environmental enrichment, viewing crowds, and zoo chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Zoo Biology 17: 211–2303.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar