Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:12:13.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of Silver Foxes in Traditional Breeding Boxes and in Boxes With an Entrance Tunnel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

B O Braastad
B O Braastad*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Norway, PO Box 5025, N-1432 Ås, Norway
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The periparturient behaviour of silver-fox females inside traditional and modified breeding boxes was video-recorded. The behaviour was analysed from 24 hours before parturition to 72 hours after, and in three diurnal periods. Twenty litters had the traditional simple breeding box, whereas 14 litters had a box with a narrow entrance tunnel. Compared to females in traditional boxes, females in tunnel boxes spent more time sleeping inside the box both before and after parturition, cleaning newborn cubs and grooming cubs while lying down, but less time looking out of the box. Excavation performed on the floor prior to parturition was performed equally often in both box types. The differences between box types were particularly pronounced for primiparous vixens. During the three postparturient days most differences in behaviour between box types were only found during working hours (0800-1500h). At this time females in non-tunnel boxes spent considerably less time sleeping and more time in locomotion within the box, looking out of the box, walking into or out of the box, standing partly out of the box, or staying out of the box, than females in tunnel boxes. Cub mortality was lower in tunnel boxes than in non-tunnel boxes. The results indicate that females in tunnel boxes had a more relaxed behaviour and were able to nurture their offspring more effectively. They did not watch their surroundings as frequently as females in traditional breeding boxes. Giving silver foxes a breeding box with an entrance tunnel may improve the welfare of both female and offspring.

Keywords

animal welfarehousingmaternal behaviournestreproductionsilver fox
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , May 1996 , pp. 155 - 166
Copyright
© 1996 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bakken, M 1992 The relationship between open field activity, competition capacity and first year reproductive success among farmed silver fox cubs (Vulpes vulpes). Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Supplement No 9: 520–528Google Scholar
Bakken, M 1993a The relationship between competition capacity and reproduction in farmed silver-fox vixens, Vulpes vulpes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 110: 147–155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakken, M 1993b Reproduction in farmed silver fox vixens, Vulpes vulpes, in relation to own competition capacity and that of neighbouring vixens. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 110: 305–311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakken, M, Braastad, B O, Harri, M, Jeppesen, L L and Pedersen, V 1994 Production conditions, behaviour and welfare of farm foxes. Scientifur 18: 233–248Google Scholar
Braastad, B O 1988 The ethological approach to reproduction problems in fox farming. In: Murphy, B D and Hunter, D B (eds) Biology, Pathology and Genetics of Fur Bearing Animals. Proceedings of the IV International Congress in Fur Animal Production pp 84–94. University of Saskatchewan: Rexdale, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Braastad, B O 1992 Progress in the ethology of foxes and mink. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Supplement No 9: 487–504Google Scholar
Braastad, B O 1993 Periparturient behaviour of successfully reproducing farmed silver-fox vixens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braastad, B O 1994 Reproduction in silver-fox vixens in breeding boxes with and without an entrance tunnel. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science 44: 38–42Google Scholar
Braastad, B O and Bakken, M 1993 Maternal infanticide and behaviour around parturition in farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, G, Carlstead, K and Wiepkema, P R 1986 The Welfare of Ranch Mink. COVP Publication 010. Centre for Poultry Research and Extension Het Spelderholt: Beekbergen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Grasse, P 1955 Traité de Zoologie Volume 17. Masson: Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
Harri, M, Cholewa, R and Mononen, J 1991 Inverkan av punktvärmare på temperaturreglering och beteende hos nyfödda rävar och finnsjubbar. Nordiske Jordbrugsforskeres Forening Seminarium No 200 NJF-Utredning/Rapport No 70: 154–160Google Scholar
Harri, M, Mononen, J, Haapanen, K and Korhonen, H 1989 Thermal protection provided by year-round nest boxes for farmbred foxes and raccoon dogs. Scientifur 13: 277–286Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L L and Pedersen, V 1990 Improvement of management routines and cage systems in fox production. Scientifur 14: 237–242Google Scholar
Lehner, P N 1979 Handbook of Ethological Methods. Garland STPM Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Moss, S and Östberg, G 1985 Lyforsök med blåräv 1984. Finsk Pälstidskrift 19: 120–121Google Scholar
Naaktgeboren, C 1965 Die Fortpflanzung des Rotfuchses, Vulpes vulpes (L.), mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Schwangerschaft und Geburt. Zoologischer Anzeiger 175: 235–263Google Scholar
Noldus, L J J 1991 The Observer: a software system for collection and analysis of observational data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 23: 415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, V 1991 Early experience with the farm environment and effects on later behaviour in silver Vulpes vulpes and blue foxes Alopex lagopus. Behavioural Processes 25: 163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc 1986 SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, USAGoogle Scholar
Zar, J H 1974 Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc: London, UKGoogle Scholar