Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:07:00.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Behaviour of Pigs in Lairage in Relation to Their Post-Weaning Management: Results of a Postal Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

E J Hunter*
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading, Berkshire, RG8 0LX, UK
H L Riches
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading, Berkshire, RG8 0LX, UK
H J Guise
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading, Berkshire, RG8 0LX, UK
R H C Penny
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading, Berkshire, RG8 0LX, UK
*
Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Lairage staff at 11 abattoirs were asked to rate which producers regularly provided pigs which were ‘easy’ (EH) or ‘difficult’ (DH) to handle, on a scale of one (very DH) to five (very EH). A postal questionnaire, dealing with various aspects of post-weaning farm management, was then given to the four or five producers sending the most EH and the four or five producers sending the most DH pigs to each abattoir. Of 105 questionnaires sent, information on 26 EH and 27 DH systems was returned. The median number of replies per abattoir was two for both EH and DH systems. In most systems (77%) pigs experienced three or four housing stages from weaning to slaughter. In each of the first five housing stages, more EH pigs had access to daylight (mean of 86% ± 11.5 (SD)) than DH pigs (mean of 64% ± 10.1 (SD), P < 0.05, two-sample t test). More EH systems provided straw in the first three housing stages, although over all stages the difference was not significant. During housing stage two, the difference in provision of straw between the systems was most marked, with 58 per cent of EH and 27 per cent of DH systems providing straw. Distance walked between housing stages three to four and four to five was significantly greater for EH compared to DH systems (EH mean of 64m ± 24.1 (SD), versus DH mean of 22m ± 14.0 (SD), and EH mean of 73m ±17.2 (SD), versus DH mean of 23m ± 8.5 (SD), P <0.001 and 0.01 respectively, two-sample t test). At loading for pre-slaughter transport, moving from daylight to daylight conditions occurred in 65 per cent of EH and 25 per cent of DH systems. Overall, the results provide circumstantial evidence that environmental factors can affect ease of handling, and hence pig welfare during pre-slaughter transport and lairage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Abbott, T A and Hunter, E J 1994 The effect of routine handling on the ease of moving and loading of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 269 (Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, T A, Hunter, E J, Guise, H J and Penny, R H C 1994 The effect of routine handling of pigs on their behaviour and subsequent meat quality. Animal Production 58: 439 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Beattie, V E, Walker, N, and Sneddon, I A 1996 An investigation of the effect of environmental enrichment and space allowance on the behaviour and production of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 48: 151158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Price, E O and Borgwardt, R 1996 Behavioural responses of domestic pigs and cattle to humans and novel stimuli. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 50: 3356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeding, C M, Hunter, E J, Guise, H J and Penny, R H C 1993 The effect of ease of handling on the welfare of slaughter pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 79 (Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar