Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T08:23:02.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of Laying Hens Negotiating Perches at Different Heights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

N R Lambe ,
G B Scott  and
D Hitchcock
N R Lambe*
Affiliation:
Kirkton Farm, Crianlarich, Perthshire FK20 8RU, UK
G B Scott
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, SAC Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW, UK
D Hitchcock
Affiliation:
Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, SAC Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Research into the responses of hens on perches is important in order to assess the welfare impact of alternative systems for egg production which incorporate perches in their design. Previous studies suggest that many flight and landing accidents occur in such systems as birds attempt to move between perches and facilities, resulting in a high incidence of bone breakage. In this study three horizontal perches were set with a gradient between them of 0, 30, 45 or 60 degrees according to treatment. Four groups of 15 ISABrown laying hens were individually exposed to each treatment, being placed on the uppermost perch (Perch 1) with a food reward available at the lowest perch (Perch 3). Behaviours performed before reaching Perch 3 were recorded over time. More birds failed to move to Perch 3 in 10 minutes when perches were separated by 45 or 60 degrees. In birds which stayed on the perches for the full 10 minutes, without reaching Perch 3, downward head movements, calling, intended jump behaviours, side-stepping and wing-flapping decreased significantly with time spent on the perches. Motivation to complete the task, in order to gain the food reward, was high in all treatments. However, when birds found perches difficult to negotiate, behaviours indicating intention to move to the food decreased with time and the incidence of behaviours indicating frustration and thwarting increased. In non-cage systems such frustration could reduce bird welfare.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourlaying hensperchesslopes
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 29 - 41
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Appleby, M C and Hughes, B O 1991 Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World’s Poultry Science Journal 47: 109–128Google Scholar
Appleby, M C, Smith, S F and Hughes, B O 1992 Individual perching behaviour of laying hens and its effects in cages. British Poultry Science 33: 227–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Box, G E P, Hunter, W G and Hunter, J S 1978 Statistics for Experimenters. John Wiley & Sons: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R C 1967 Statistics for Biologists. Cambridge University Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Duncan, E T, Appleby, M C and Hughes, B O 1992 Effects of perches in laying cages on welfare and production of hens. British Poultry Science 33: 25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I J H and Wood-Gush, D G M 1972 Thwarting of feeding behaviour in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 20: 444–451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N G, Wilkins, L J, Eleperuma, S D, Ballantyne, A J and Overfield, N D 1990 Broken bones in the domestic fowls: effect of husbandry system and stunning method in end-of-lay hens. British Poultry Science 31: 59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C and Dawkins, M S 1990 Homes fit for hens. New Scientist 125: 46–51Google Scholar
Rowell, C H F 1961 Displacement grooming in the chaffinch. Animal Behaviour 9: 38–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, G B, Lambe, N R and Hitchcock, D In press. The ability of laying hens to negotiate horizontal perches at different heights, separated by different angles. Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceGoogle Scholar
Scott, G B and Parker, CAL 1994 The ability of laying hens to negotiate between horizontal perches. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauson, R, Jansson, L and Abrahamsson, P 1992 Studies on Alternative Keeping Systems for Laying Hens in Sweden at the Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, March 1988 - October 1991. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet: Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, D G M, Duncan, I J H and Savory, C J 1978 Observations on the social behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild. Biology of Behaviour 3: 193–205Google Scholar
Wood-Gush, D G M and Guiton, P H 1967 Studies on thwarting in the domestic fowl. Revue du Compartement Animal 5: 1–23Google Scholar