Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:54:34.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Behaviour of Dogs in a Rescue Shelter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

D Wells  and
P G Hepper
D Wells
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 INN, Northern Ireland
P G Hepper
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 INN, Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Every year sees an increase in the number of dogs admitted to rescue shelters. However well these dogs are cared for in the shelter it cannot be ignored that being in such a situation is stressful, and the time spent in the shelter may change the dogs’ behaviour which may in turn influence their chances of being bought from the shelter. This research examined the behaviour of stray and unwanted dogs on their first, third and fifth days in an Ulster Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (USPCA) shelter. A questionnaire was also distributed to members of the public to determine how popular the USPCA was as a place from where to purchase a dog, and what factors about a dog's physical characteristics, behaviour and environment influenced potential buyers. Results revealed no significant difference between the behaviour of stray and unwanted dogs although the public viewed stray dogs as much less desirable than unwanted dogs. Time in the shelter had no adverse effects on the dogs’ behaviour. Indeed those changes which did occur during captivity, dogs being more relaxed in the presence of people and eating food more quickly, may be considered as positive changes. The USPCA was viewed as a popular place from which to buy a dog. Of factors influencing the public's choice, the dog's environment and behaviour appeared more important than its physical characteristics. The presence of a toy in the dog's cage greatly increased the public's preference for the dog, although the toy was ignored by the dog. The welfare implications of sheltering dogs are discussed.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourcaptivitydogsdog sheltersUSPCA
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , August 1992 , pp. 171 - 186
Copyright
© 1992 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Beaver, B V 1989 Environmental enrichment for laboratoty animals. ILAR News 31(2): 5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomstrand, M, Riddle, K, Alford, P, Maple, T L 1986 Objective evaluation of a behavioral enrichment device for captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Zoo Biology 5: 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittus, W P J 1979 The evolution of behaviours regulating density and age-specific sex ratios in a primate population. Behaviour 69: 265–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M W 1968 (ed) Abnormal Behavior in Animals. Saunders: PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
Fox, M W 1971 Behavior of Wolves, Dogs and Related Canids. Harper: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Freedman, D G, Kind, J A, Elliot, O 1961 Critical periods in the social development in dogs. Science 133: 1016–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hediger, H 1950 Wild Animals in Captivity. Butterworth: LondonGoogle Scholar
Hediger, H 1955 Studies of the Psychology and Behaviour of Captive Animals in Zoos and Circuses. Butterworth: LondonGoogle Scholar
Hepper, P G 1986 Sibling recognition in the domestic dog. Animal Behaviour 34: 288–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, H 1972 The Spotted Hyaena: a study of predation and social behavior. University of Chicago Press: ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Kuhme, W 1965 Communal food distribution and division of labour in African hunting dogs. Nature 205: 443–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, R, Mason, W A 1971 Establishment of a colony of titi monkeys. International Zoo Yearbook 11: 168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, D W, Moehlman, P D 1982 Cooperation, altruism, and restraint in the reproduction of carnivores. In Bateson, PPG, Klopfer, P H (eds) Perspectives in Ethology, 5 Ontogeny, pp 433–467. Plenum: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H 1982 Behavioral Enrichment in the Zoo. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Mech, L D 1970 The Wolf: the ecology and behavior of an endangered species. Natural History Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Morris, D 1964 The responses of animals to a restricted environment. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 13: 99–118Google Scholar
Naish, J N 1982 Tool use by captive chimpanzees at an artificial termite mound. Zoo Biology 1: 211–221Google Scholar
Northern Ireland Census of Population 1981 Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: LondonGoogle Scholar
Poole, T B 1988 Normal and abnormal behaviour in captive primates. Primate Reports No 22: 3–12Google Scholar
Redshaw, M E, Mallinson, J J C 1991 Stimulation of natural patterns of behaviour: studies with golden lion tamarins and gorillas. In Box, H O (ed) Primate Responses to Environmental Change, pp 217–238. Chapman & Hall: LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J P 1957 Critical periods in the development of social behavior in puppies. Psychosomatic Medicine 20: 42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, R 1977 Putting the wild back into the zoo. International Zoo News 24: 11–18Google Scholar
Stevenson, M F 1983 The captive environment: its effects on exploratory and related behavioural responses in wild animals. In Archer, J, Buke, L (eds) Exploration in Animals and Humans, pp 176–197. Van Nostrand Reinhold: LondonGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F 1984 Animal boredom: is a scientific study of the subjective experiences of animals possible? Advances in Animal Welfare Science, 1984/85. Humane Society of the US: Washington D CGoogle Scholar
Wilsson, E 1984 The social interaction between mother and offspring during weaning in German Shepherd dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 13: 101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar