Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:01:24.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of the impact of government animal welfare policy on farm animal welfare in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

RM Bennett ,
DM Broom ,
SJ Henson ,
RJP Blaney  and
G Harper
RM Bennett*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The University of Reading, PO Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
DM Broom
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OES, UK
SJ Henson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The University of Reading, PO Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
RJP Blaney
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The University of Reading, PO Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
G Harper
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The University of Reading, PO Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
*
* Correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper presents the method and findings of a Delphi expert survey to assess the impact of UK government farm animal welfare policy, farm assurance schemes and major food retailer specifications on the welfare of animals on farms. Two case-study livestock production systems are considered, dairy and cage egg production. The method identifies how well the various standards perform in terms of their effects on a number of key farm animal welfare variables, and provides estimates of the impact of the three types of standard on the welfare of animals on farms, taking account of producer compliance. The study highlights that there remains considerable scope for government policy, together with farm assurance schemes, to improve the welfare of farm animals by introducing standards that address key factors affecting animal welfare and by increasing compliance of livestock producers. There is a need for more comprehensive, regular and random surveys of on-farm welfare to monitor compliance with welfare standards (legislation and welfare codes) and the welfare of farm animals over time, and a need to collect farm data on the costs of compliance with standards.

Keywords

animal welfareexpert (Delphi) surveyfarm animal welfare standardsgovernment policyimpact assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
© 2004 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Appleby, MC and Hughes, BO 1997 Animal Welfare. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R, Harper, G, Henson, S, French, N and Moore, A 2003 Economic evaluation of DEFRA policy on food-borne pathogens in live animals. Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, University of Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R, Henson, S, Harper, G, Blaney, R and Preibisch, K 2000 Economic Evaluation of Farm Animal Welfare Policy: Baseline Study and Framework Development. Report to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The University of Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1986 Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal 142: 524–526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, DM 1988 The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1999 The welfare of dairy cattle. In: Aagaard, K (ed) Proceedings of the 25th International Dairy Congress, Aarhus 1998. Ill Future Milk Farming pp 32–39. Danish National Committee of IDF: Aarhus, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 2001 Assessing the welfare of hens and broilers. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium 13: 61–70Google Scholar
Broom, DM 2002 Does present legislation help animal welfare? Landbauforschung Völkenrode 227: 63–69Google Scholar
Broom, DM and Johnson, KG 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare p 211. Kluwer: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) 2002 Animal health and welfare. Available at: www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfareGoogle Scholar
FAWC (Farm Animal Welfare Council) 1992 FAWC updates the Five Freedoms. Veterinary Record 131: 357Google Scholar
FAWC (Farm Animal Welfare Council) 2001 Interim Report on the Animal Welfare Implications of Farm Animal Assurance Schemes. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1995 Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the ‘inextricable connection’. Animal Welfare 4: 103–117Google Scholar
Linstone, H and Turoff, M 1975 The Delphi Method: Technologies and Applications. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA McEachern M and Tregear A 2000 Farm animal welfare in the UK: a comparison of assurance schemes. Farm Management 10: 685–708Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003 Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: consensus of expert opinion. Animal Welfare 12: 205–217Google Scholar