Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hultgren, Jan
Wiberg, Sofia
Berg, Charlotte
Cvek, Katarina
and
Lunner Kolstrup, Christina
2014.
Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 152,
Issue. ,
p.
23.
Schiffer, KJ
Retz, SK
Richter, U
Algers, B
and
Hensel, O
2014.
Assessment of key parameters for gunshot used on cattle: a pilot study on shot placement and effects of diverse ammunition on isolated cattle heads.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
479.
Gibson, Troy J.
Bedford, Elisabeth M.
Chancellor, Natalie M.
and
Limon, Georgina
2015.
Pathophysiology of free-bullet slaughter of horses and ponies.
Meat Science,
Vol. 108,
Issue. ,
p.
120.
Gibson, Troy J.
Whitehead, Claire
Taylor, Rebecca
Sykes, Olivia
Chancellor, Natalie M.
and
Limon, Georgina
2015.
Pathophysiology of penetrating captive bolt stunning in Alpacas (Vicugna pacos).
Meat Science,
Vol. 100,
Issue. ,
p.
227.
Gibson, Troy J.
Mason, Charles W.
Spence, Jade Y.
Barker, Heather
and
Gregory, Neville G.
2015.
Factors Affecting Penetrating Captive Bolt Gun Performance.
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
222.
Schwenk, Barbara K.
Lechner, Isabel
Ross, Steffen G.
Gascho, Dominic
Kneubuehl, Beat P.
Glardon, Matthieu
and
Stoffel, Michael H.
2016.
Magnetic resonance imaging and computer tomography of brain lesions in water buffaloes and cattle stunned with handguns or captive bolts.
Meat Science,
Vol. 113,
Issue. ,
p.
35.
Gilliam, JN
Shearer, JK
Bahr, RJ
Crochik, S
Woods, J
Hill, J
Reynolds, J
and
Taylor, JD
2016.
Evaluation of brainstem disruption following penetrating captive-bolt shot in isolated cattle heads: comparison of traditional and alternative shot-placement landmarks.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
347.
Terlouw, Claudia
Bourguet, Cécile
and
Deiss, Véronique
2016.
Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part II. Evaluation methods.
Meat Science,
Vol. 118,
Issue. ,
p.
147.
Romero, M.H.
Uribe-Velásquez, L.F.
Sánchez, J.A.
Rayas-Amor, A.A.
and
Miranda-de la Lama, G.C.
2017.
Conventional versus modern abattoirs in Colombia: Impacts on welfare indicators and risk factors for high muscle pH in commercial Zebu young bulls.
Meat Science,
Vol. 123,
Issue. ,
p.
173.
Grandin, Temple
2017.
On-farm conditions that compromise animal welfare that can be monitored at the slaughter plant.
Meat Science,
Vol. 132,
Issue. ,
p.
52.
Oliveira, Steffan Edward Octávio
Gregory, Neville George
Dalla Costa, Filipe Antonio
Gibson, Troy John
and
Paranhos da Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues
2017.
Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun.
Meat Science,
Vol. 130,
Issue. ,
p.
64.
Collins, Samantha L.
Caldwell, Marc
Hecht, Silke
and
Whitlock, Brian K.
2017.
Comparison of penetrating and nonpenetrating captive bolt methods in horned goats.
American Journal of Veterinary Research,
Vol. 78,
Issue. 2,
p.
151.
Schiffer, KJ
Retz, SK
Algers, B
and
Hensel, O
2017.
Assessment of stun quality after gunshot used on cattle: a pilot study on effects of diverse ammunition on physical signs displayed after the shot, brain tissue damage and brain haemorrhages.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 1,
p.
95.
Losada-Espinosa, Natyieli
Villarroel, Morris
María, Gustavo A.
and
Miranda-de la Lama, Genaro C.
2018.
Pre-slaughter cattle welfare indicators for use in commercial abattoirs with voluntary monitoring systems: A systematic review.
Meat Science,
Vol. 138,
Issue. ,
p.
34.
de la Cruz, L.
Gibson, T.J.
Guerrero-Legarreta, I.
Napolitano, F.
Mora-Medina, P.
and
Mota-Rojas, D.
2018.
The welfare of water buffaloes during the slaughter process: A review.
Livestock Science,
Vol. 212,
Issue. ,
p.
22.
Oliveira, Steffan Edward Octávio
Gregory, Neville George
Dalla Costa, Filipe Antonio
Gibson, Troy John
Dalla Costa, Osmar Antonio
and
Paranhos da Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues
2018.
Effectiveness of pneumatically powered penetrating and non-penetrating captive bolts in stunning cattle.
Meat Science,
Vol. 140,
Issue. ,
p.
9.
Gilliam, JN
Woods, J
Hill, J
Shearer, JK
Reynolds, J
and
Taylor, JD
2018.
Evaluation of the CASH Dispatch Kit combined with alternative shot placement landmarks as a single-step euthanasia method for cattle of various ages.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 3,
p.
225.
Martin, Miriam S.
Kline, Helen C.
Wagner, Dana R.
Alexander, Lacey R.
Edwards-Callaway, Lily N.
and
Grandin, Temple
2018.
Evaluation of different captive bolt lengths and breed influence upon post-stun hind limb and forelimb activity in fed cattle at a commercial slaughter facility.
Meat Science,
Vol. 143,
Issue. ,
p.
159.
Grist, Andrew
Lines, Jeff A.
Bock, Randall
Knowles, Toby G.
and
Wotton, Stephen B.
2019.
An Examination of the Performance of Blank Cartridges Used in Captive Bolt Devices for the Pre-Slaughter Stunning and Euthanasia of Animals.
Animals,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 8,
p.
552.
Kamenik, Josef
Paral, Vaclav
Pyszko, Martin
and
Voslarova, Eva
2019.
Cattle stunning with a penetrative captive bolt device: A review.
Animal Science Journal,
Vol. 90,
Issue. 3,
p.
307.