Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:08:50.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of stun quality after gunshot used on cattle: a pilot study on effects of diverse ammunition on physical signs displayed after the shot, brain tissue damage and brain haemorrhages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

KJ Schiffer ,
SK Retz ,
B Algers  and
O Hensel
KJ Schiffer*
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Nordbahnhofstr 1a, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
SK Retz
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Nordbahnhofstr 1a, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
B Algers
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Environment and Health, PO Box 234, 53223 Skara, Sweden
O Hensel
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Nordbahnhofstr 1a, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Moving the slaughter process from the abattoir to the animals’ familiar environment has the potential to reduce pre-mortal stressors to a minimum and contribute considerably to improved animal welfare at slaughter. On-farm stunning and killing of free-range cattle via gunshot became legal in Germany in November 2011, including for commercial sale of the meat. As an effective stun is essential for maintaining animal welfare until the animal dies, the goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of delivering an instantaneous and deep stun by an accurate frontal gunshot at cattle. Thirty free-range cattle (Galloway, German Angus) were shot with five different combinations of rifles and bullets. A stun-quality protocol was developed to assess musculoskeletal, optical and respiratory signs displayed after the shot. Key signs, such as failure to collapse, corneal reflex, spontaneous blinking, eyeball rotation or eyeball movement, distinct vocalisation and rhythmic breathing were not evident in 29 of the 30 cattle. Dissections of the heads were used to detect penetration depth of the projectile as well as evaluate brain tissue damage and brain haemorrhage caused by the shot. Tissue damage was marginal and not related to the ascertained level of stun quality. Brain haemorrhages assumed to be sufficient for causing a deep stun were detected in 25 out of 30 cattle. Accurate shot placement turned out to be more important than the application of a certain calibre. However, it was considered crucial for safety reasons that the projectile should remain within the cranial cavity. As long as there are high levels of accuracy, gunshot was considered to be an effective stunning method with the potential of maintaining high standards of animal welfare until death occurs.

Keywords

animal welfarebrain haemorrhagecattlegunshotphysical signsstun quality
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 95 - 109
Copyright
© 2017 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Algers, B, Anil, H, Blokhuis, H, Fuchs, K, Hultgren, J, Lambooij, B, Nunes, T, Paulsen, P and Smulders, F 2009 Project to develop Animal Welfare Risk Assessment. Guidelines on Stunning and Killing. Project developed on the proposal CFP/EFSA/AHAW/2007/01. http://onli-nelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2009.EN-11/abstractCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algers, B and Atkinson, S 2007 Stun quality in relation to cat-tle size, gun type and brain haemorrhages. ISAH 2007: Animal Health, Animal Welfare and Biosecurity. Proceedings Volume 2. XIII International Congress in Animal Hygiene pp 1028–1031. 17-21 June 2007, Tartu, Estonia. International Society for Animal Hygiene and Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences: Estonian University of Life Sciences, EstoniaGoogle Scholar
Anil, H and Lambooij, B 2009 Stunning and slaughter methods. In: Smulders, FJM and Algers, B (eds) Welfare of Production Animals: Assessment and Management of Risks, First Edition. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, S and Algers, B 2007 The development of a stun quality audit for cattle and pigs at slaughter. ISAH 2007: Animal Health, Animal Welfare and Biosecurity. Proceedings Volume 2. XIII International Congress in Animal Hygiene pp 1023–1027. 17-21 June 2007, Tartu, Estonia. International Society for Animal Hygiene and Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences: Estonian University of Life Sciences, EstoniaGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, S and Algers, B 2009 Cattle welfare, stun quality and efficiency in 3 abattoirs using different designs of stun box loading, stun box restraint and weapons. Project Report, Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Skara, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, S, Velarde, A and Algers, B 2013 Assessment of stun quality at commercial slaughter in cattle shot with captive bolt. Animal Welfare 22: 473–481. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.4.473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) 2013 AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, 2013 Edition. AVMA: Schaumburg, IL, USA. https://www.avma.org/KB/Policies/Documents/euthanasia.pdfGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, D 1985 Energy requirements for the penetration of heads of domestic stock and the development of a multiple pro-jectile. The Veterinary Record 116: 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.116.2.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
bsi Schwarzenbek 2013 Gute fachliche Praxis der tierschutzgerecht-en Schlachtung von Rind und Schwein. http://www.bsi-schwarzenbek.de/Dokumente/bsi_gute_Praxis_4_13.pdf. [Title translation: Code of best practice for slaughtering of cattle and pigs]Google Scholar
Daly, CC, Gregory, NG and Wotton, SB 1987 Captive bolt stunning of cattle: effects on brain function and role of bolt veloc-ity. British Veterinary Journal 143(6): 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(87)90049-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BMJ (Deutsches Bundesministerium der Justiz und fuer Verbraucherschutz) [German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection] 2007/2011 Verordnung über Anforderungen an die Hygiene beim Herstellen, Behandeln und Inverkehrbringen von bestimmten Lebensmitteln tierischen Ursprungs (Tierische Lebensmittel-Hygieneverordnung - Tier-LMHV). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/tier-lmhv/gesamt.pdf. [Title translati-on: Regulation on hygiene regarding production, treatment and sale of certain foodstuffs from animal origin]Google Scholar
BMJ (Deutsches Bundesministerium der Justiz und fuer Verbraucherschutz) [German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection] 2012 Verordnung zum Schutz von Tieren im Zusammenhang mit der Schlachtung oder Tötung und zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1099/2009 des Rates (Tierschutz-Schlachtverordnung - TierSchlV). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/tierschlv_2013/gesamt.pdf. [Title translation: Regulation on the protection of animals at slaughter or killing]Google Scholar
Bunzel-Drueke, M, Böhm, C, Finck, P, Kämmer, G, Luick, R, Reisinger, E, Riecken, U, Riedl, J, Scharf, M and Zimball, O 2009 Praxisleitfaden fuer Ganzjahresbeweidung in Naturschutz und Landschaftsentwicklung – “Wilde Weiden”. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Biologischer Umweltschutz in Kreis Soest eV, Bad Sassendorf-Lohne, Germany. [Title translation: Guidelines for all-season out-door husbandry in nature protection and landscape development]Google Scholar
Di Maio, VJM 1999 Gunshot Wounds, Second Edition. CRC Press: Boca Raton, USAGoogle Scholar
EC (European Community) 2004 Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of food-stuffs. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:139:0055:0205:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
EC (European Community) 2009 Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
EFSA 2004 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission related to welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing the main commercial species of animals. Question No EFSA-Q-2003-093. EFSA Journal 45: 1–29Google Scholar
Ewbank, R, Parker, MJ and Mason, CW 1992 Reactions of cat-tle to head-restraint at stunning: a practical dilemma. Animal Welfare 1(1): 55–64Google Scholar
Ferguson, DM and Warner, RD 2008 Have we underestimat-ed the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in rumi-nants? Meat Science 80: 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meats-ci.2008.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnie, JW 1993a Brain damage caused by a captive bolt pistol. Journal of Comparative Pathology 109: 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(08)80250-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnie, JW 1993b Pathology of experimental traumatic cranio-cerebral missile injury. Journal of Comparative Pathology 108: 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(08)80231-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnie, JW 1997 Traumatic head injury in ruminant livestock. A ustralian Veterinary Journal 75: 204–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnie, JW, Manavis, J, Blumbergs, PC and Summersides, GE 2002 Brain damage in sheep from penetrating captive bolt stunning. Australian Veterinary Journal 80(1-2): 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2002.tb12840.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilliam, JN, Shearer, JK, Woods, J, Hill, J, Reynolds, J and Taylor, JD 2012 Captive-bolt euthanasia of cattle: determination of optimal-shot placement and evaluation of the Cash Special Euthanizer Kit for euthanasia of cattle. Animal Welfare 21: 99–102. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouveia, KG, Ferreira, PG, Roque da Costa, JC, Vaz-Pires, P and Martins da Costa, P 2009 Assessment of the efficiency of captive-bolt stunning in cattle and feasibility of associated behavioural signs. Animal Welfare 18: 171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1992 Observations of cattle restraint devices for stunning and slaughtering. Animal Welfare 1(2): 85–90Google Scholar
Grandin, T 1994 Euthanasia and slaughter of livestock. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 204: 1354–1360Google ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T 1998a Objective scoring of animal handling and stun-ning practices at slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212: 36–39Google ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T 1998b The feasibility of using vocalization scoring as an indicator of poor welfare during cattle slaughter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00102-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 2002 Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 221(9): 1258–1261. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2002.221.1258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T 2006 Progress and challenges in animal handling and slaughter in the U.S. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100: 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 2012 Developing measures to audit welfare of cattle and pigs at slaughter. Animal Welfare 21: 351–356. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.3.351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N and Shaw, F 2000 Penetrating captive bolt stunning and exsanguination of cattle in abattoirs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 3(3): 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0303_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG 2007 Animal Welfare and Meat Production, Second Edition. CABI Intl: Wallingford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932152.0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG, Lee, CJ and Widdicombe, JP 2007 Depth of concussion in cattle shot by penetrating captive bolt. Meat Science 77(4): 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilsenbeck, EM 2007 Untersuchungen zur Entblutezeit bei Rindern nach Bolzenschußbetäubung. PhD Thesis, University of Munich, Germany. [Title translation: Investigation on bleeding time after captive bolt stunning of cattle]Google Scholar
Ilgert, H 1985 Effizienz der Bolzenschussbetäubung beim Rind mit Berücksichtigung der Einschussstelle und der Eindringrichtung des Bolzens unter Praxisbedingungen. PhD Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. [Title translation: Efficiency of routine penetrative captive bolt stunning in cattle in consideration of shooting placement and shooting direction]Google Scholar
Jarvis, AM, Messer, CDA and Cockram, MS 1996 Handling, bruising and dehydration of cattle at the time of slaughter. Animal Welfare 5: 259–270Google Scholar
Kohlen, S 2011 Untersuchungen zum korrekten Treffpunkt für den Bolzenschuss bei der Betäubung von Rindern bei der Schlachtung. PhD, Thesis, Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. [Title translation: Analysis of the accurate target for stunning of cattle by a captive bolt pistol before slaughter]Google Scholar
König, HE and Liebich, H-G 2008 Anatomie der Haussäugetiere: Lehrbuch und Farbatlas für Studium und Praxis, Fourth Edition. Schattauer: Stuttgart, Germany. [Title translation: Anatomy of mammals: study book and colour atlas for studying and practice]Google Scholar
Lambooy, E and Spanjaard, W 1981 Effect of the shooting position on the stunning of calves by captive bolt. Veterinary Record 109(16): 359–361. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.109.16.359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiffer, KJ, Retz, SK, Richter, U, Algers, B and Hensel, O 2014 Assessment of key parameters for gunshot used on cattle: a pilot study on shot placement and effects of diverse ammunition at isolated cattle heads. Animal Welfare 23: 479–489. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.4.479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, KJ, Retz, SK, von Wenzlawowicz, M and Hensel, O 2013 Stress-free slaughter of outdoor cattle. In: Röcklinsberg, H and Sandin, P (eds) EurSafe2013: The Ethics of Consumption: The Citizen, the Market and the Law. Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics (EurSafe) pp 516–521. 11-14 September 2013, Uppsala, Sweden. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, FD 1989 The corneal reflex following captive bolt stun-ning. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 37: 43–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.1989.35553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, QW, Du, M and Means, WJ 2009 Regulation of post-mortem glycolysis and meat quality. In: Du, M and McCormick, RJ (eds) Applied Muscle Biology and Meat Science pp 175–194. CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15797-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, EMC, Bourguet, C and Deiss, V 2012 Stress at slaughter in cattle: role of reactivity profile and environmental fac-tors. Animal Welfare 21: 43–49. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troeger, K and Moje, M 2012 Stunning failure rate zero per-cent? Fleischwirtschaft International 27: 28–30Google Scholar
von Wenzlawowicz, M, von Holleben, K and Eser, E 2012 Identifying reasons for stun failures in slaughterhouses for cattle and pigs in a field study. Animal Welfare 21: 51–60. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593527CrossRefGoogle Scholar