Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:29:49.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of key parameters for gunshot used on cattle: a pilot study on shot placement and effects of diverse ammunition on isolated cattle heads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

KJ Schiffer ,
SK Retz ,
U Richter ,
B Algers  and
O Hensel
KJ Schiffer*
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
SK Retz
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
U Richter
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
B Algers
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Animal Environment and Health, PO Box 234, 53223 Skara, Sweden
O Hensel
Affiliation:
University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There have been many improvements regarding transport conditions, pre-slaughter handling, and captive-bolt stunning of cattle at commercial abattoirs, but many challenges still exist. Animals unaccustomed to human-animal contact, such as free-range beef cattle, may be especially difficult to handle on the day of slaughter. Shifting of the slaughter process from the abattoir to the animals’ familiar environment could improve animal welfare at slaughter. In 2011, the German government passed an amendment allowing farmers to slaughter free-range cattle, on-farm, using a rifle. A proper stun is vital when employing this method but neither sufficient practical experience nor scientific knowledge are in place to allow this. Thus, this study aimed to examine shot placement and the effect of diverse ammunition by means of shooting at cattle heads, post mortem, with a rifle. Impact was assessed using brain tissue damage observed from skull dissections. Placing the shot frontally at the forehead resulted in severe brain damage significantly more frequently than targeting laterally. A precise frontal shot, utilising both large and small bore calibres, caused severe brain damage that would almost certainly have led to immediate unconsciousness and death. One of the small bore calibres caused minimal brain damage apart from the trajectory. However, this was the only calibre not passing straight through. Due to the fact that the bullet remains within the skull, thus transferring all of its energy to the skull and brain, the impact of this calibre on the brain would also be expected to be rapidly fatal. A projectile that does not exit the skull would also be advantageous as regards safety.

Keywords

animal welfarebrain damagecattlegunshotslaughterstunning
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , November 2014 , pp. 479 - 489
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Algers, B and Atkinson, S 2007 Stun quality in relation to cat-tle size, gun type and brain haemorrhages. In: Aland, A (ed) ISAH 2007: Animal Health, Animal Welfare and Biosecurity. Proceedings Volume 2. XIII International Congress in Animal Hygiene pp 1028–1031. 17-21 June 2007, Tartu, Estonia. International Society for Animal Hygiene and Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences: Estonian University of Life Sciences, EstoniaGoogle Scholar
Algers, B, Anil, H, Blokhuis, H, Fuchs, K, Hultgren, J, Lambooij, B, Nunes, T, Paulsen, P and Smulders, F 2009 Project to develop Animal Welfare Risk Assessment. Guidelines on Stunning and Killing. Project developed on the proposal CFP/EFSA/AHAW/2007/01. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1211902958022.htmGoogle Scholar
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) 2013 AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. AVMA: Schaumburg, IL, USA. https://www.avma.org/KB/Policies/Documents/euthanasia.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anil, H and Lambooij, B 2009 Stunning and slaughter methods. In: Smulders, FJM and Algers, B (eds) Welfare of Production Animals: Assessment and Management of Risks, First Edition. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, S and Algers, B 2007 The development of a stun quality audit for cattle and pigs at slaughter. In: Aland, A (ed) ISAH 2007: Animal Health, Animal Welfare and Biosecurity. Proceedings Volume 2. XIII International Congress in Animal Hygiene pp 1023–1027. 17-21 June 2007, Tartu, Estonia. International Society for Animal Hygiene and Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences: Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia.Google Scholar
Atkinson, S and Algers, B 2009 Cattle welfare, stun quality and efficiency in 3 abattoirs using different designs of stun box loading, stun box restraint and weapons. Project Report Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Skara, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, S, Velarde, A and Algers, B 2013 Assessment of stun quality at commercial slaughter in cattle shot with captive bolt. Animal Welfare 22: 473–481. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.4.473Google Scholar
Blackmore, D 1985 Energy requirements for the penetration of heads of domestic stock and the development of a multiple pro-jectile. The Veterinary Record 116: 36–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.116.2.36Google Scholar
BMJ (Deutsches Bundesministerium der Justiz und fuer Verbraucherschutz) [German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection] 2007/2011 Verordnung über Anforderungen an die Hygiene beim Herstellen, Behandeln und Inverkehrbringen von bestimmten Lebensmitteln tierischen Ursprungs (Tierische Lebensmittel-Hygieneverordnung - Tier-LMHV). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/tier-lmhv/gesamt.pdf. [Title translati-on: Regulation on hygiene regarding production, treatment and sale of certain foodstuffs from animal origin]Google Scholar
BMJ (Deutsches Bundesministerium der Justiz und fuer Verbraucherschutz) [German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection] 2012 Verordnung zum Schutz von Tieren im Zusammenhang mit der Schlachtung oder Tötung und zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr 1099/2009 des Rates (Tierschutz-Schlachtverordnung - TierSchlV). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/tierschlv_2013/gesamt.pdf. [Title translation: Regulation on the protection of animals at slaughter or killing]Google Scholar
Di Maio, VJM 1999 Gunshot Wounds, Second Edition. CRC Press: Boca Raton, USAGoogle Scholar
EC (European Community) 2004 Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 Laying Down Specific Hygiene Rules for on the Hygiene of Foodstuffs. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:139:0055:0205:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
EC (European Community) 2009 Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the Protection of Animals at the Time of Killing. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex UriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, DM and Warner, RD 2008 Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Science 80: 12–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnie, JW 1993 Brain damage caused by a captive bolt pistol. Journal of Comparative Pathology 109: 253–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(08)80250-2Google ScholarPubMed
Finnie, JW 1997 Traumatic head injury in ruminant livestock. Australian Veterinary Journal 75: 204–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1997.tb10067.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, K 1994 Transport zur Schlachtstätte. Bundesanstalt für Fleischforschung. Schlachten von Schwein und Rind. Kulmbacher Reihe, Band 13 pp 22–42. Kulmbach: GermanyGoogle Scholar
Gebresenbet, G, Wikner, I, Bobobee, EYH, Maria, G and Villarroel, M 2012 Effect of transport time and handling on phys-iological responses of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A2: 800-814Google Scholar
Gilliam, JN, Shearer, JK, Woods, J, Hill, J, Reynolds, J and Taylor, JD 2012 Captive-bolt euthanasia of cattle: determination of optimal-shot placement and evaluation of the Cash Special Euthanizer Kit for euthanasia of cattle. Animal Welfare 21: 99–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593806Google Scholar
Grandin, T 1998 Objective scoring of animal handling and stun-ning practices at slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212: 36–39Google ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T 2006 Progress and challenges in animal handling and slaughter in the US. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100: 129–139Google Scholar
Grandin, T 2012 Developing measures to audit welfare of cattle and pigs at slaughter. Animal Welfare 21: 351–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.3.351Google Scholar
Hartung, J and Springorum, AC 2009 Animal welfare and transport. In: Smulders, FJM and Algers, B (eds) Welfare of Production Animals: Assessment and Management of Risks, 1st Edition. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Ilgert, H 1985 Effizienz der Bolzenschussbetäubung beim Rind mit Berücksichtigung der Einschussstelle und der Eindringrichtung des Bolzens unter Praxisbedingungen. PhD Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. [Title translation: Efficiency of routine penetrative captive bolt stunning in cattle in consideration of shooting position and shooting direction]Google Scholar
Jarvis, AM, Messer, CDA and Cockram, MS 1996 Handling, bruising and dehydration of cattle at the time of slaughter. Animal Welfare 5: 259–270Google Scholar
Kohlen, S 2011 Untersuchungen zum korrekten Treffpunkt für den Bolzenschuss bei der Betäubung von Rindern bei der Schlachtung. PhD Thesis, Tierärztliche Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. [Title translation: Analysis of the accurate target for stunning of cattle by a captive bolt pistol before slaughter]Google Scholar
Millar, GI and Mills, DS 2000 Observations on the trajectory of the bullet in 15 horses euthanased by free bullet. The Veterinary Record 146: 754–756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.146.26.754Google ScholarPubMed
Retz, SK, Schiffer, KJ, von Wenzlawowicz, M and Hensel, O 2013 Stressfreie Schlachtung von Weiderindern – Erste Erkenntnisse eines Pilotprojekts. Tierärztliche Umschau 6: 242–243.[Title translation: Stress-free slaughter of outdoor cattle – first findings of a pilot project]Google Scholar
Schiffer, KJ, Retz, SK, von Wenzlawowicz, M and Hensel, O 2013 Stress-free slaughter of outdoor cattle. In: Röcklinsberg, H and Sandin, P (eds) EurSafe2013: The Ethics of Consumption: The Citizen, the Market and the Law. Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics (EurSafe) pp 516–521. 11-14 September, Uppsala, Sweden. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Shen, QW, Du, M and Means, WJ 2009 Regulation of post-mortem glycolysis and meat quality. In: Du, M and McCormick, RJ (eds) Applied Muscle Biology and Meat Science pp 175–194. CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA.Google Scholar
Terlouw, EMC, Bourguet, C and Deiss, V 2012 Stress at slaughter in cattle: role of reactivity profile and environmental fac-tors. Animal Welfare 21: 43–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TVT (Tierärztliche Vereinigung für Tierschutz eV) 2007 Tierschutzgerechtes Schlachten von Rindern, Schweinen, Schafen und Ziegen. Merkblatt 89. TVT: Bramsche, Germany. www.tierschutz-tvt.de/merkblaetter.html. [Title translation: Humane slaughter of cattle, pigs, sheep and goats]Google Scholar
Von Wenzlawowicz, M, von Holleben, K and Eser, E 2012 Identifying reasons for stun failures in slaughterhouses for cattle and pigs in a field study. Animal Welfare 21: 51–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593527Google Scholar
Wernicki, A, Urban-Chmiel, R, Kankofer, P, Mikucki, P, Puchalski, A and Tokarzewski, S 2006 Evaluation of plasma cortisol and TBARS levels in calves after short-term transportation. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire 157: 30–34Google Scholar