Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:09:13.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The assessment of bar chewing as an escape behaviour in laboratory mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

RS Lewis
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston, Cheshire CH64 7TE, UK
JL Hurst*
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston, Cheshire CH64 7TE, UK
*
* Correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ability to measure objectively how an animal perceives its home environment is essential for improving the housing and husbandry conditions of laboratory animals. Chewing at cage bars by a rodent may reflect the animal's desire to escape from its home cage and thus provide a measure of the relative aversiveness or inadequacy of different housing conditions from the animal's viewpoint. To assess whether bar chewing by laboratory mice is an escape behaviour, adult male and female ICR-(CD-1) mice were housed individually or in same-sex groups of three in modified shoebox-type cages. Cages had two sets of external bars in the side walls, an equivalent set of bars fixed internally and a Perspex lid. One set of external bars opened daily, allowing the mice to escape into a larger arena. All mice showed a strong preference for chewing at external bars over those that were internal to each cage. After one week of experience, mice also preferred the external bars that opened daily to those that did not open. Behaviour directed towards the cage lid declined over time as the mice experienced the new escape route in the cage side. Interest in the external bars correlated positively with time since last escape. Results confirm that bar chewing reflects an attempt to escape the cage and explore the surrounding area and may provide a suitable behavioural measure of perception of the cage environment for use in welfare assessment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Barnett, JL, Hemsworth, PH, Cronin, GM, Winfield, CG, McCallum, TH and Newman, EA 1988 The effects of genotype on physiological and behavioural responses related to the welfare of pregnant pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 287296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, HJM, Van Tintelen, G, Van Vorstenbosch, CJAHV, Baumans, V and Beynen, AC 1996 Preferences of mice and rats for types of bedding material. Laboratory Animals 30: 234244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, JJ and Nicol, CJ 1996 Stereotypic behaviour in wild caught and laboratory bred bank voles (Clethrionymus glareolus). Animal Welfare 5: 245257Google Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1988 Behavioural deprivation: a central problem in animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 209225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13: 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, S 1996 Territorial dominance of male laboratory mice. Ethology 102: 979985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, JL, Barnard, CJ, Hare, R, Wheeldon, EB and West, CD 1996 Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: time-budgeting and pathophysiology in single-sex groups. Animal Behaviour 52: 335360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, JL, Barnard, CJ, Nevison, CM and West, C 1997 Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: welfare implications of isolation and social contact among caged males. Animal Welfare 6: 329347Google Scholar
Hurst, JL, Barnard, CJ, Nevison, CM and West, C 1998 Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: the welfare implications of social isolation and social contact among females. Animal Welfare 7: 121136Google Scholar
Hurst, JL, Barnard, CJ, Tolladay, U, Nevison, CM and West, CD 1999 Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: effects of cage stocking density and behavioural predictors of welfare. Animal Behaviour 58: 563586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, RS 2003 Assessing the responses of laboratory mice to the home cage environment. PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool, UKGoogle Scholar
Meddis, R 1984 Statistics Using Ranks - A Unified Approach. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Nevison, CM, Hurst, JL and Barnard, CJ 1999a Why do male ICR(CD-1) mice perform bar-related stereotypic behaviour? Behavioural Processes 47: 95111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevison, CM, Hurst, JL and Barnard, CJ 1999b Strain-specific effects of cage enrichment in male laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Animal Welfare 8: 361379Google Scholar
Odberg, F 1986 The jumping stereotypy in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Biology and Behaviour 11: 130143Google Scholar
Rushen, J 1993 The ‘coping’ hypothesis of stereotypic behaviour. Animal Behaviour 45: 613615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, CM 1996 Laboratory mice persist in gaining access to resources: a method of assessing the importance of environmental features. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 48: 203314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Weerd, HA, Van Loo, PLP, Van Zutphen, LFM, Koolhaas, JM and Baumans, V 1998a Strength of preference for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 369382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Weerd, HA, Van Loo, PLP, Van Zutphen, LFM, Koolhaas, JM and Baumans, V 1998b Preferences for nest boxes as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Animal Welfare 7: 1125Google Scholar
Wiedenmayer, C 1997 Causation of the ontogenetic development of stereotypic digging in gerbils. Animal Behaviour 53: 461470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurbel, H and Stauffacher, M 1997 Age and weight at weaning affect corticosterone level and development of stereotypies in ICR-mice. Animal Behaviour 53: 891900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurbel, H, Chapman, R and Rutland, C 1998 Effect of feed and environmental enrichment on development of stereotypic wire-gnawing in laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60: 6981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurbel, H, Stauffacher, M and von Holst, D 1996 Stereotypies in laboratory mice — quantitative and qualitative description of the ontogeny of ‘wire-gnawing’ and ‘jumping’ in Zur:ICR and Zur:ICR nu. Ethology 102: 371385CrossRefGoogle Scholar