Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:40:38.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Animals Capable of Deception or Empathy? Implications for Animal Consciousness and Animal Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S Kuczaj ,
K Tranel ,
M Trone  and
H Hill
S Kuczaj*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5025, USA
K Tranel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5025, USA
M Trone
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5025, USA
H Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5025, USA
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Awareness of the self and awareness of others are difficult faculties to define. Part of the problem lies in the wide range of abilities that involve various aspects of awareness. Some of the most commonly studied abilities focus on the self-awareness of the individual. These abilities range from the capacity to distinguish self from non-self to the competency to reflect on one's past, present or future condition. Another set of abilities that is relevant to the study of awareness involves the interactions of individuals, and includes behaviours such as deception and empathy. We explore the possibility that species other than humans engage in deception and empathy, and consider the implications of such behaviours for self-awareness and other-awareness in these species. Although examples from a variety of species are provided, many examples come from dolphins and whales. This reflects both the authors’ interest in these animals and the possibility that large-brained creatures are more likely to engage in deliberate deception and/or true empathy.

Keywords

animal welfareconsciousnessdeceptiondolphinempathytheory of mind
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue S1: Consciousness, Cognition and Animal Welfare: Proceedings of the UFAW Symposium, Zoological Society of London, 11-12 May 2000 , February 2001 , pp. S161 - S173
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Adams, E S and Caldwell, R L 1990 Deceptive communication in asymmetric fights of the stomatopod crustacean Gonodactylus bredini. Animal Behaviour 39: 706–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bel'kovich, V M, Krushinskaya, N L and Gurevich, V S 1969 The behavior of dolphins in captivity. Priroda 5: 18–28Google Scholar
Byrne, R W and Whiten, A 1985 Tactical deception of familiar individuals in baboons (Papio ursinus). Animal Behaviour 33: 669–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R W and Whiten, A 1988 Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R W and Whiten, A 1992 Cognition evolution in primates: evidence from tactical deception. Man 27: 609–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, R L and Dingle, H 1975 Ecology and evolution of agonistic behavior in the stomatopods. Naturwissenschaften 62: 214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockcroft, V G and Ross, G J 1990 Observations on the early development of a captive bottlenose dolphin calf. In: Leatherwood, S and Reeves, R (eds) The Bottlenose Dolphin pp 461–478. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, R C 2000 Group living in whales and dolphins. In: Mann, J, Connor, R C, Tyack, P L and Whitehead, H (eds) Cetacean Societies pp 199–218. University of Chicago Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Connor, R C and Norris, K S 1982 Are dolphins reciprocal altruists? The American Naturalist 119: 358–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, R C and Peterson, D 1994 The Lives of Whales and Dolphins. Henry Holt and Co: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Connor, R C, Smolker, R and Richards, A 1992 Dolphins’ alliances and coalitions. In: Harcourt, A and de Waal, F (eds) Coalitions and Competition in Animals and Humans pp 415–442. Oxford University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F 1998 Chimpanzee Politics. John Hopkins University Press: Maryland, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essapian, F 1953 The birth and growth of a porpoise. Natural History. November 392–399Google Scholar
Gory, J and Kuczaj, S A 1999 Can bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) plan their behavior? Paper presented at the biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, Wailea, Maui, Hawaii: November 28-December 3Google Scholar
Gubbins, C, McCowan, B, Lynn, S, Hooper, S and Reiss, D 1999 Mother-infant spatial relations in captive bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Marine Mammal Science 15: 751–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guggisberg, C A 1972 Crocodiles. Stackpole Books: UKGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M D 1997 Minding the behaviour of deception. In: Whiten, A and Byrne, R (eds) Machiavellian Intelligence II pp 112–143. Cambridge University Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerison, H J 1973 Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Jerison, H J 1986 The perceptual worlds of dolphins. In: Schusterman, R J, Thomas, J A and Wood, FG (eds) Dolphin Cognition and Behavior: a Comparative Approach pp 149–166. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S A, Lacinak, C T and Turner, T N 1998 Environmental enrichment for marine mammals at Sea World. In: Shepherdson, D J, Mellen, J D and Hutchins, M (eds) Second Nature pp 314–328. Smithsonian University Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S A, Hill, H M, Tranel, K, Trone, M and Solangi, M 1999 The roles of mothers, peers and other adults in the behavioral development of bottlenose dolphins. Paper presented at the biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, Wailea, Maui, Hawaii: November 28-December 3Google Scholar
Lea, SEG 2001 Anticipation and memory as criteria for special welfare consideration. Animal Welfare 10: S195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland, S 1997 Peaceful Kingdom. Random Acts of Kindness by Animals. Conari Press: California, USAGoogle Scholar
Mann, J and Smuts, B 1999 Behavioral development in wild bottlenose dolphin newborns (Tursiops truncatus). Behaviour 136: 529–566Google Scholar
Marino, L 1998 A comparison of encephalization between odontocete cetaceans and anthropoid primates. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 51: 230–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markowitz, H 1982 Behavioral Enrichment in the Zoo. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Mercado, E, Murray, S, Uyeyama, R, Pack, A and Herman, L 1998 Memory for recent actions in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): repetition of arbitrary behaviors using an abstract rule. Animal Learning and Behavior 26: 210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam-Webster Inc 1997 Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edition. Merriam-Webster Inc: PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
Morgane, P J, Jacobs, M S and Galaburda, A 1986 Evolutionary morphology of the dolphin brain. In: Schusterman, R J, Thomas, J A, and Wood, F G (eds) Dolphin Cognition and Behavior: a Comparative Approach pp 5–29. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Norris, K and Prescott, J 1961 Observations on Pacific cetaceans of California and Mexican waters. University of California Publication of Zoology 63: 291–402Google Scholar
Parker, S T, Mitchell, R W and Boccia, M L (eds) 1994 Self-awareness in Animals and Humans. Cambridge University Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J W 1977 Pseudorca stranding. Oceans 10: 8–15Google Scholar
Pough, H F, Andrews, R M, Cadle, J E, Crump, M L, Savitzky, A H and Wells, K D 1998 Herpetology. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Pryor, K, Haag, R and O'Reilly, J 1969 The creative porpoise: training for novel behavior. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior 12: 653–661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridgway, S H 1986 Dolphin brain size. In: Bryden, M M and Harrison, R (eds) Research on Dolphins pp 59–70. Oxford Science Publications: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, S H 1990 The central nervous system of the bottlenose dolphin. In: Leatherwood, S and Reeves, R (eds) The Bottlenose Dolphin pp 69–97. Academic Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, S H, Kamolnick, T, Curry, C and Tarpley, R J 1995 Orphan-induced lactation in Tursiops and analysis of collected milk. Marine Mammal Science 11: 172–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolders, S J 1988 Adoption behavior in the bottlenose dolphin. Aquatic Mammals 14: 78–81Google Scholar
Smolker, R, Richards, A, Connor, R and Pepper, J 1992 Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour 123: 38–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudd, J H and Franks, N R 1987 The Behavioural Ecology of Ants. Chapman and Hall: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavolga, M and Essapian, F 1957 The behaviour of the bottle-nosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): mating, pregnancy, parturition and mother-infant behaviour. Zoologica 42: 11–31Google Scholar
Wells, R, Scott, M and Irvine, A 1987 The social structure of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins. In: Genoways, H (ed) Current Mammalogy, Volume 1 pp 247–305. Plenum: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A and Byrne, R W (eds) 1997 Machiavellian Intelligence II. Cambridge University Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G S 1984 Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature 308: 181–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar