Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:00:04.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anticipation and Memory as Criteria for Special Welfare Consideration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S E G Lea
S E G Lea*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is widely agreed that all animals are entitled to some degree of welfare consideration, but that some are entitled to more consideration than others. However, the basis for singling out some animals for special consideration often seems to be mostly a matter of degree of similarity to, or association with, humans. A more reasonable criterion would involve the extent of suffering caused by given events. Two variables that seem likely to be very important in the extent of suffering are the capacity to anticipate and the capacity to recall. Everyday experience tells us that human suffering can be hugely amplified by either anticipation or recall of painful or distressing events. In the past, psychologists have tended to take the view that both these processes depend on the possession of language, and were therefore irrelevant to species other than humans. But comparative psychologists are increasingly making use of concepts from human cognition, including both memory and anticipation, to explain animals’ responses to both past and future events. These processes are invoked to explain the behaviour of a wide range of vertebrate species. Recent work on primate cognition indicates that more elaborate forms of representation may be possible in the great apes. Such evidence should be used as the basis for deciding whether to give special welfare consideration to certain species which have special cognitive capacities — or indeed enhanced welfare consideration to a wider range of species, if their cognitive capacities are found to be more sophisticated than is generally assumed.

Keywords

animal memoryanimal welfaregreat apesself conceptsocial learning
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue S1: Consciousness, Cognition and Animal Welfare: Proceedings of the UFAW Symposium, Zoological Society of London, 11-12 May 2000 , February 2001 , pp. S195 - S208
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anil, M H, McKinstry, J L, Field, M and Rodway, R G 1997 Lack of evidence for stress being caused to pigs by witnessing the slaughter of conspecifics. Animal Welfare 6: 3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R C and Shiffrin, R M 1968 Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence, K W (ed) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 2 pp 89–195. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, D E 1957 A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. Psychological Review 64: 205–215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bugnyar, T and Huber, L 1997 Push or pull: an experimental study on imitation in marmosets. Animal Behaviour 54: 817–831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R W 1999 Primate cognition: evidence for the ethical treatment of primates. In: Dolins, F L (ed) Attitudes to Animals: Views in Animal Welfare pp 114–125. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forkman, B 2001 Domestic hens have declarative representations. Animal Welfare 10: S235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouts, R and Mills, S 1998 Next of Kin. Penguin: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Gaffan, D and Parker, A 1996 Interaction of perirhinal cortex with the fornix-fimbria: memory for objects and ‘object-in-place’ memory. Journal of Neuroscience 16: 5864–5869CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galef, B G and Whiskin, E E 1997 Effects of social and asocial learning on longevity of food-preference traditions. Animal Behaviour 53: 1313–1322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup, G G, Povinelli, D J, Suarez, S D, Anderson, J R, Lethmate, J and Menzel, E W 1995 Further reflections on self-recognition in primates. Animal Behaviour 50: 1525–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GB Parliament 1876 Cruelty to Animals Act 1876. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
GB Parliament 1986 Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D, Dickinson, A and Clayton, N 1999 Episodic memory: what can animals remember about their past? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 74–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, P 1995 Criteria for judging the unwholesomeness of actions in the texts of Theravaada Buddhism. Journal of Buddhist Ethics 2: 10Google Scholar
Heyes, C M 1993 Imitation, culture and cognition. Animal Behaviour 46: 999–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C M 1994 Reflections on self-recognition in primates. Animal Behaviour 47: 909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C M, Dawson, G R and Nokes, T 1992 Imitation in rats: initial responding and transfer evidence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45B: 229–240Google Scholar
Hilgard, E R 1958 Theories of Learning, 2nd edition. Methuen: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Holland, P C and Straub, J J 1979 Differential effects of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 5: 65–78Google ScholarPubMed
Hume, C W 1956 The Status of Animals in the Christian Religion. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A N B, Burne, T H J and Rose, S P R 1998 Observation learning in day-old chicks using a one-trial passive avoidance learning paradigm. Animal Behaviour 56: 1347–1353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamil, A C and Balda, R P 1990 Differential memory for different cache sites by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga Columbiana). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 16: 162–168Google Scholar
Köhler, W 1927 The Mentality of Apes, 2nd edition. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S, Tranel, K, Trone, M and Hill, H 2001 Are animals capable of deception or empathy? Implications for animal consciousness and animal welfare. Animal Welfare 10: S161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFollette, H and Shanks, N 1996 The origin of speciesism. Philosophy 71: 41–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K N and Plotkin, H C 1992 Further experimental studies of the social learning and transmission of foraging information amongst Norway rats. Behavioural Processes 27: 53–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lea, S E G and Kiley-Worthington, M 1996 Can animals think? In: Bruce V (ed) Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind pp 211–244. Erlbaum (UK) Taylor and Francis: Hove, UKGoogle Scholar
Leeper, R 1935 The role of motivation in learning: a study of the phenomenon of differential motivational control of the utilization of habits. Journal of Genetic Psychology 46: 3–40Google Scholar
Macdonald, I M V 1997 Field experiments on duration and precision of grey and red squirrel spatial memory. Animal Behaviour 54: 879–891CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackintosh, N J 1965 Overtraining, transfer to proprioceptive control, and position reversal. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 15: 26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H 1975 Do elephants ever forget? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 8: 333–335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendl, M, Burman, O, Laughlin, K and Paul, E 2001 Animal memory and animal welfare. Animal Welfare 10: S141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepperberg, IM 1981 Functional vocalizations by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 55: 139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, D J, Nelson, K E and Boysen, S T 1992a Comprehension of role reversal in chimpanzees: evidence of empathy. Animal Behaviour 43: 633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, D J, Parks, K A and Novak, M A 1992b Role reversal by rhesus monkeys, but no evidence of empathy. Animal Behaviour 44: 269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, J J, Chetcuti, Y and Will, B 1980 Behavior and length of survival of populations of enriched and impoverished rats in the presence of a predator. Biology of Behavior 5: 361–369Google Scholar
Ryder, R D 1983 Victims of Science: the Use of Animals in Research, 2nd edition. Centaur: FontwellGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E S and Lewin, R 1994 Kanzi: at the Brink of the Human Mind. Wiley: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Sharp, P E 1999 Complimentary roles for hippocampal versus subicular/entorhinal place cells in coding place, context, and events. Hippocampus 9: 432–4433.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, P 1990 Animal Liberation, 2nd edition. Cape: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Suddendorf, T and Corballis, M C 1997 Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 123: 133–167Google ScholarPubMed
Thorpe, W H 1956 Learning and Instinct in Animals. Methuen: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E C, Ritchie, B F and Kalish, D 1946 Studies in spatial learning: II. Place learning versus response learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 37: 385–392Google Scholar
Tschudin, A J-P C 2001 ‘Mindreading’ mammals? Attribution of belief tasks with dolphins. Animal Welfare 10: SI 19–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lawick-Goodall, J 1971 In the Shadow of Man. Collins: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Yaughan, W and Greene, S L 1984 Pigeon visual memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 10: 256–271Google Scholar
Zadeh, L A, Fu, K-S, Tanaka, K and Shimura, M 1975 Fuzzy Sets and their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar