Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T18:13:48.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal welfare and pest control: meeting both conservation and animal welfare goals

Conservation and Animal Welfare Science Workshop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

KE Littin
KE Littin*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Directorate, MAF Biosecurity New Zealand, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, PO Box 2526, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
*
email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

animal welfareconservationpest controlvertebrate pestvertebrate pest controlwildlife management
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 171 - 176
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Albrecht, G, McMahon, CR, Bowman, DMJS and Bradshaw, CJA 2009 Convergence of culture, ecology, and ethics: management of feral swamp buffalo in Northern Australia. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22: 361–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, M, Bulfield, G, Clark, S, Gormally, L, Hignett, P, Kimball, H, Milburn, C and Moffitt, J 1995 Report of the Committee to Consider the Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies in the Breeding of Farm Animals. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF): London, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1999 The welfare of vertebrate pests in relation to their management. In: Cowan, DP and Feare, CJ (eds) Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management pp 309–329. Filander Verlag: Fürth, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Caughley, J, Monamy, V and Heiden, K 1994 Impact of the 1993 Mouse Plague. Grains Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Cook, CJ 1998 Serotonergic and cholecystokinin antagonists change patterns of response in rats (Rattus norvegicus) to oral sodium monofluoroacetate. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 46: 76–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowled, BD, Elsworth, P and Lapidge, SJ 2008 Additional toxins for feral pig (Sus scrofa) control: identifying and testing Achilles’ heels. Wildlife Research 35: 651–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEFRA 2005 Review of effectiveness, environmental impact, humaneness and feasibility of lethal methods for badger control. A report to European Wildlife Division, DEFRA, 20 October, 2005. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA): London, UK. http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/pdf/review-201005.pdfGoogle Scholar
Eggleston, JE, Rixecker, SS and Hickling, GJ 2003 The role of ethics in the management of New Zealand's wild mammals. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 30: 361–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, PM, O’Connor, CE and Murphy, EC 2005 Acute oral toxicity of p-aminopropiophenone to stoats (Mustela erminea). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 32: 163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG 1998 Rationale for controlling vertebrate pests. In: Mellor, DJ, Fisher, M and Sutherland, G (eds) Ethical Approaches to Animal-Based Science pp 121–124. ANZCCART: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG 2001 Attitudes to animal welfare and the environment. In: Baker, RM, Fisher, M and Hemsworth, P (eds) Farm Animals in Research: Can we Meet the Demands of Ethics, Welfare, Science and Industry pp 1–10. ANZCCART: Glen Osmond, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG 2004 Physiology and Behaviour of Animal Suffering. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG, Milne, LM, Rhodes, AT, Wickstrom, M and Eason, CT 1998 Effect of potassium cyanide on behaviour and time to death in possums. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 46: 60–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickling, GJ 1994 Animal welfare and vertebrate pest management: compromise or conflict? In: Baker, RM, Mellor, DJ and Nicol, AM (eds) Animal Welfare in the Twenty-First Century: Ethical, Educational and Scientific Challenges pp 119–124. ANZCCART: Glen Osmond, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Hone, J 2007 Wildlife Damage Control. CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
HVPC (Humane Vertebrate Pest Control Working Group) 2004 A National Approach Towards Humane Vertebrate Pest Control. RSPCA: Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Iossa, G, Soulsbury, CD and Harris, S 2007 Mammal trapping: a review of animal welfare standards of killing and restraining traps. Animal Welfare 16: 335–352Google Scholar
Kirkwood, JK 1992 Wild animal welfare. In: Ryder, R (ed) Animal Welfare and the Environment pp 139–154. Gerald Duckworth and Co: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, JK, Sainsbury, AW and Bennett, I 1994 The welfare of free-living wild animals: methods of assessment. Animal Welfare 3: 257–273Google Scholar
Littin, KE, Mellor, DJ, Warburton, B and Eason, CT 2004 Ethical and animal welfare principles for humane vertebrate pest control; a review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 52: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littin, KE, O’Connor, CE, Gregory, NG, Mellor, DJ and Eason, CT 2002 Behaviour, coagulopathy and pathology of brush-tail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) poisoned with brodifacoum. Wildlife Research 29: 259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAFF 1997 Evaluation of Fully Approved or Provisionally Approved Products: Evaluation on Assessment of Humaneness of Vertebrate Control Agents (Issue No 74). MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries): York, UKGoogle Scholar
Marks, CA 1996 Do we need a new vertebrate pest control ethic? In: Fisher PM and Marks CA (eds) Humaneness and Vertebrate Pest Control: Proceedings of Seminar Held 27th March 1996. Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Report Series No 2 pp 16–19. Agriculture Victoria: Tynong North, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Marks, CA 1999 Ethical issues in vertebrate pest control: can we balance the welfare of individuals and ecosystems? In: Mellor, DJ and Monamy, V (eds) The Use of Wildlife in Research pp 79–89. ANZCCART: Glen Osmond, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Marks, CA 2009 Fumigation of rabbit warrens with chloropicrin produces poor welfare outcomes: a review. Wildlife Research 36: 342–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, CA, Allen, L, Gigliotti, F, Busana, F, Gonzalez, T, Lindeman, M and Fisher, PM 2004 Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping. Animal Welfare 13: 393–399Google Scholar
Marks, CA, Hackman, C, Busana, F and Gigliotti, F 2000 Assuring that 1080 toxicosis in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is humane: fluoroacetic acid (1080) and drug combinations. Wildlife Research 27: 483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ and Littin, KE 2003 The humaneness of rodent pest control. Animal Welfare 12: 1–37Google Scholar
Meerburg, BG, Brom, FWA and Kijlstra, A 2008 Perspective: the ethics of rodent control. Pest Management Science 64: 1205–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, MC and Thornhill, RH 2006 Animal liberationist responses to non-anthropogenic animal suffering. Worldviews 10: 355–379Google Scholar
Morrison, R 1996 Rabbit control, does the end justify any means? In: Fisher PM and Marks CA (eds) Humaneness and Vertebrate Pest Control: Proceedings of Seminar Held 27th March 1996. Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Report Series No 2 pp 46–49. Victorian Institute of Animal Science: Frankston, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Muschamp, D 1996 The control of vertebrate pests: ethical decision making. In: Fisher PM and Marks CA (eds) Humaneness and Vertebrate Pest Control: Proceedings of Seminar Held 27th March 1996. Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Report Series No 2 pp 6–8. Victorian Institute of Animal Science: Frankston, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Nettles, VF 1997 Potential consequences and problems with wildlife contraceptives. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 9: 137–143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norbury, G and Heyward, R 1996 The response of ferrets to rabbit control. Ferrets as Vectors of Tuberculosis and Threats to Conservation. The Royal Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Series 36 pp 30–33. The Royal Society of New Zealand: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, CE, Littin, KE, Milne, LM, Airey, AT, Webster, R, Arthur, DG, Eason, CT and Gregory, NG 2007 Behavioural, biochemical, and pathological responses of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) poisoned with phosphorus paste. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 55: 109–112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oogjes, G 1996 The ANZFAS view of vertebrate pest control using chloropicrin fumigation and 1080 poisoning. In: Fisher PM and Marks CA (eds) Humaneness and Vertebrate Pest Control: Proceedings of Seminar Held 27th March 1996. Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Report Series No 2 pp 9–12. 27th. Victorian Institute of Animal Science: Frankston, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Oogjes, G 1997 Ethical aspects and dilemmas of fertility control of unwanted wildlife: an animal welfarist's perspective. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 9: 163–167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oogjes, G 1999 Our ethical obligation to ‘mislocated’ animals: the Animals Australia approach. In: Mellor, DJ and Monamy, V (eds) The Use of Wildlife for Research pp 100–107. ANZCCART: Glen Osmond, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Rowsell, HC, Ritcey, J and Cox, F 1979 Assessment of humaneness of vertebrate pesticides. Proceedings of the Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Science 1978–1979: 236–249Google Scholar
Russell, WMS and Burch, RL 1992 The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, Special Edition. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, UKGoogle Scholar
Sharp, T and Saunders, G 2008 A Model for Assessing the relative Humaneness of Pest Animal Control Methods. Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Sherley, M 2007 Is sodium fluoroacetate (1080) a humane poison? Animal Welfare 16: 449–458Google Scholar
Singer, P 1997 Neither human nor natural: ethics and feral animals. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 9: 157–162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spedding, C 2000 Animal Welfare. Earthscan Publications: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Swingland, I 1992 The human impact on wildlife and the environment In: Ryder, R (ed) Animal Welfare and the Environment pp 17–26. Gerald Duckworth and Co: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Thompson, HV 1990 Animal welfare and the control of vertebrates. In: Davis, LR and Marsh, RE (eds) Proceedings of the 14th Vertebrate Pest Conference pp 5–7. University of California at Davis: Davis, CA, USA. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1075&context=vpc14Google Scholar
Warburton, B 1998 The ‘humane’ trap saga: a tale of competing ethical ideologies. In: Mellor, DJ, Fisher, M and Sutherland, G (eds) Ethical Approaches to Animal-Based Science pp 131–137. ANZC-CART: Glen Osmond, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Warburton, B and Choquenot, D 1999 Animal welfare and pest control: the context is important. In: Mellor, DJ and Monamy, V (eds) The Use of Wildlife for Research pp 90–99. ANZCCART: Glen Osmond, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Warburton, B and Norton, BG 2009 Towards a knowledge-based ethic for lethal control of nuisance wildlife. Journal of Wildlife Management 73: 158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburton, B and O’Connor, CE 2004 Research on vertebrate pesticides and traps: do wild animals benefit? Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Supplement 1 ATLA 32: 229–234Google ScholarPubMed
Warburton, B, Poutu, N, Peters, D and Waddington, P 2008 Traps for killing stoats (Mustela erminea): improving welfare performance. Animal Welfare 17: 111–116Google Scholar
Wilkins, D 1992 Animal welfare and the environment: are they always compatible? In: Ryder, R (ed) Animal Welfare and the Environment pp 73–80. Gerald Duckworth and Co Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar