Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T19:22:27.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allowing Captive Marmosets to Choose the Size and Position of Their Nest Box

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

G R Hosey ,
M Jacques  and
M Burton
G R Hosey*
Affiliation:
Bolton Primate Research Team, Biology and Environmental Studies, Bolton Institute, Deane Road, Bolton BL3 5AB, UK
M Jacques
Affiliation:
Bolton Primate Research Team, Biology and Environmental Studies, Bolton Institute, Deane Road, Bolton BL3 5AB, UK
M Burton
Affiliation:
Bolton Primate Research Team, Biology and Environmental Studies, Bolton Institute, Deane Road, Bolton BL3 5AB, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Preferences for nest box size and position were tested in two groups of common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus jacchus. In a pre-test phase two, new, wooden nest boxes were introduced to each group alongside their old metal one, so that the animals could become familiar with them, and so that any pre-existing preference could be identified. In successive experiments: i) the old metal nest box was closed so that the marmosets had to choose a preferred box from the two new nest boxes; ii) the size of the preferred nest box was systematically reduced; and iii) in one of the groups the reduced nest box was restored to full size, but its position interchanged with the non-preferred box. In a further experiment, the position of the preferred, and then of the non-preferred box was raised to the highest point in the cage. The marmosets showed strong positional preferences which could not have been predicted without performing the tests. One of the groups also showed a strong preference for the high nest box. It was concluded that marmosets may exhibit preferences for their cage furniture, the basis of which may not be clear to us. These preferences should, however, be taken into account when designing cages to maximize the welfare of the animals.

Keywords

animal welfaremarmosetsnest boxpreferences
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , August 1999 , pp. 281 - 285
Copyright
© 1999 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Box, H O and Rohrhuber, B 1993 Differences in behaviour among adult male, female pairs of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in different conditions of housing. Animal Technology 44: 19–30Google Scholar
Caine, N G, Potter, M P and Mayer, E 1992 Sleeping site selection by captive tamarins (Saguinus labiatus). Ethology 90: 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M 1976 Towards an objective method of assessing welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolins, F and Chamove, A S 1987 Substrate use and locomotory behaviour in captive cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). International Journal of Primatology 8: 548 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Hughes, B O and Black, A J 1973 The preference of domestic hens for different types of battery cage floor. British Poultry Science 14: 615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerl, J and Rothe, H 1996 Influence of cage size and cage equipment on physiology and behaviour of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Laboratory Primate Newsletter 35: 10–14Google Scholar
Kitchen, A M and Martin, A A 1996 The effects of cage size and complexity on the behaviour of captive common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus jacchus. Laboratory Animals 30: 317–326Google ScholarPubMed
Scott, L 1991 Environmental enrichment for single housed common marmosets. In Box, H O (ed) Primate Responses to Environmental Change pp 265–274. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, R W and Kinzey, W G 1984 The ecological role of the Callitrichidae: a review. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 64: 419–449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed