Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:03:48.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of animal welfare data collection: a case study on whaling operations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

V Papastavrou
V Papastavrou*
Affiliation:
International Fund for Animal Welfare, The Old Chapel, Fairview Drive, Bristol BS6 6PH, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At present, there is no binding requirement within the International Whaling Commission (IWC) for presentation of animal welfare data and, in recent years, the whaling nations have stopped supplying data regarding the welfare implications of whaling for commercial purposes. In the past, although analyses of data were provided, the raw data were not publicly accessible. In 2006, an analysis was conducted of video footage of Japan's ‘scientific whaling’ in the Southern Ocean during the 2005/06 season. The results of the analysis suggested some severe animal welfare issues associated with the hunt based on a limited sample size. The case is made for the provision of such data to the IWC to be made compulsory. This would be achieved through an amendment to the IWC Schedule requiring specified animal welfare data. Such a schedule amendment should be drafted to include all forms of commercial whaling (including ‘scientific whaling’ and whaling under objection) and should build upon earlier proposals that were presented to the IWC between 2000 and 2003.

Keywords

animal welfaredataInternational Whaling CommissionJapanlegislationscientific whaling
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 22 , Issue 1: Including selected abstracts from the WSPA/Defra Whale Welfare and Ethics Workshop, March 2011 , February 2013 , pp. 127 - 130
Copyright
© 2013 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anon 2000 Data needed to assess welfare aspects of whaling. UK Submission to the IWC. IWC/52/RMS2 pp 3. IWC: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Anon 2010 Report from the NAMMCO Expert Group meeting. Assessment of Whale Killing Data. 17-18 February 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available on http://www. nammco.no/Nammco/Mainpage/Publications/WorkshopReports/Google Scholar
Busby, L and Holt, S 2008 Annotated Guide to the Schedule of the International Convention for the regulation of Whaling. Report to IFAW pp 32. IFAW: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Gales, N, Leaper, R and Papastavrou, V 2007 Is Japan's whaling humane? Marine Policy 32: 408–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IWC 2001 Report of the Working Group on Whale Killing Methods and Associated Welfare Issues. IWC/53/6 pp 3. 18 July 2001, London, UKGoogle Scholar
IWC 2003 Revised Action Plan on Whale Killing Methods. Appendix 4 of the Report of the Workshop on Whale Killing Methods and Associated Welfare Issues, IWC/55/Rep3. 7-9 June 2003, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Leaper, R and Papastavrou, V 2010 Interim report on progress to develop further the ASCOBANS Conservation Plan for Harbour Porpoise in the North Sea. Report to ASCOBANS. AC17Doc.4-05(S) rev.1. Dist 6 Sept 2010. http://www.service-board.de/ascobans_neu/files/ac17/AC17_4-05_rev1_NorthSeaPlan_InterimProgressReport.pdfGoogle Scholar
Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries 2011 HØringsnotat om regulering av fangst av vågehval in 2011. Directorate of Fisheries, 02.02.11. Norway. http://www.fiskeridir.no/content/download/22712/214521/version/1/file/hoeringregulering-av-hvalfangsten-2011.pdf. [Title translation: Consultation paper on the regulation of whaling of minke whales in 2011]Google Scholar