Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:38:03.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of cumulative gas production technique to characterize changes in the fermentation characteristics of rumen contents following variable periods of starvation and grazing in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

P. Chilibrostet
Affiliation:
Wageningen Institute of Animal Science, Animal Nutrition Group, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG, Wageningen, The Netherlands
B. A. Williams
Affiliation:
Wageningen Institute of Animal Science, Animal Nutrition Group, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG, Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. Tamminga
Affiliation:
Wageningen Institute of Animal Science, Animal Nutrition Group, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The effect of the duration of grazing (experiment 1) and starvation time and placement in the rumen of inert bulk material before grazing (experiment 2), on the rumen content ferment ability, was investigated by means of measuring cumulative gas production. In experiment 1, a comparison was made of four durations of grazing (1, 1·75, 2·50 and 3·25 h) after overnight starvation. Rumen samples taken from the cows after 1 h of grazing had higher values of total accumulated gas with less (P < 0·05) time required to reach the maximum fermentation rate than cows grazed for 3·25 h. Following grazing, a 7·75·h starvation period was imposed on the four treatments. The extent of fermentation was significantly lower (P < 0·01) after starvation than immediately after grazing (49·7 v. 60·8% of incubated dry matter (DM), respectively). Experiment 2 consisted of a factorial combination of two durations of starvation before grazing (16·5 (LS) and 2·5 (SS) h) with the presence or absence in the rumen of 12·5 kg of a synthetic indigestible material. Before grazing the total accumulated gas production was less (P < 0·05) for the LS than for the SS cows. After the grazing session, the total gas of rumen samples from the LS cows was significantly higher (P < 0·05) than for the SS cows.

This was in agreement with the observed higher DM intake during grazing and DM rumen pools after grazing in LS cows. For both starvation periods, the presence of inert rumen bulk led to a higher total gas, a shorter half-time and less DM left unfermented. The measurement of fermentation kinetics by cumulative gas production was suitable to detect changes in rumen content fermentation patterns due to the clearance of material from the rumen (effect of starvation) or DM intake during the grazing sessions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beuvink, J. M. W., Spoelstra, S. F. and Hogendorp, R. J. 1992. An automated method for measuring time-course of gas production of feedstuffs incubated with buffered rumen fluid. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 40: 401407.Google Scholar
Beuvink, J. M. W., Visser, H. de and Klop, A. 1993. In vitro gas production kinetics of different maize products: a comparison to nylon bag degradation kinetics. In Measuring and modelling in vitro gas production kinetics to evaluate ruminai fermentation of feedstuffs. Ph.D. thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bliimmel, M. and Becker, K. 1997. The degradability characteristics of fifty-four roughage and roughage neutral detergent fibres as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake. British Journal of Nutrition 77: 757768.Google Scholar
Bliimmel, M. and Ørskov, E.R. 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughage in predicting feed intake in cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 40: 109119.Google Scholar
Chilibroste, P., Tamminga, S. and Boer, H. 1997. Effect of length of grazing session, rumen fill and starvation time before grazing on dry matter intake, ingestive behaviour and dry matter rumen pool sizes of grazing lactating dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 52: 249257.Google Scholar
Chilibroste, P., Tamminga, S., Bruchem, J. van and Togt, P. L. van der. 1998a. Effect of allowed grazing time, inert rumen bulk and length of starvation before grazing, on the weight, composition and fermentative end-products of the rumen contents of lactating dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 53: 146156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilibroste, P., Tamminga, S. and Williams, B. A. 1998b. Effect of days of regrowth of ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on fermentation characteristics. Comparison of the nylon bag and gas production techniques. In In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants (ed. Deaville, E. R., Owen, E., A. T. Adesogan, , Rymer, C., J. A., Huntington and Lawrence, T. L. J.), British Society of Animal Science, occasional publication no. 22, pp. 4043.Google Scholar
Cone, W. J., Beuvink, J. M. W. and Rodriguez, M. 1994. Use and applications of an automated time related gas production test for the in vitro study of fermentation kinetics in the rumen. Revista Portuguesa de Zootecnica 1: 2537.Google Scholar
Cone, W. J., Gelder, A. H. van and Driehuis, F. 1997. Description of gas production profiles with a three-phasic model. Animal Feed Science and Technology 66: 3145.Google Scholar
Cone, W. J., Gelder, A. H. van Visscher, G. J. W. and Oudshoorn, L. 1996. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus Animal Feed Science and Technology 61: 113128.Google Scholar
Davies, D. R., Theodorou, M. K., Baughan, J., Brooks, A. E. and Newbold, J. R. 1995. An automated pressure evaluation system (APES) for determining the fermentation characteristics of ruminant feeds. Annales de Zootechnie 44: (suppl. 1) 36.Google Scholar
Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural handbook no. 379, ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Groot, J. C. J., Cone, W. J., Williams, B. A., Debersaques, F. M. A. and Lantinga, E.A. 1996. Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminants feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64: 7789.Google Scholar
Khazaal, K., Dentinho, M. T., Ribeiro, J. M. and Ørskov, E.R. 1993. A comparison of gas production during incubation with rumen content in vitro and nylon bag degradability as predictors of the apparent digestibility in vivo and the voluntary intake of hays. Animal Production 57: 105112.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. and Ørskov, E. R. 1977. A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 645650.Google Scholar
Menke, K. H. and Steingass, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28: 755.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1985. Runimant nitrogen usage. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nocek, J. E. and Tamminga, S. 1991. Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 35983629.Google Scholar
Pell, A. N. and Schofield, P. 1993. Computerised monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro . Journal of Dairy Science 76: 10631073.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J., Huckle, C. A. and Penning, P. D. 1994. Effect of sward height and concentrate supplementation on the ingestive behaviour of spring-calving dairy cows grazing grass-clover swards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 101112.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. and Pell, A. N. 1994. Validity of using accumulated gas pressure readings to measure forage digestion in vitro: a comparison involving three forages. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 22302238.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. and Pell, A.N. 1995. Measurement and kinetics analysis of the neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrate fraction of legumes and grasses. Journal of Animal Science 73: 34553463.Google Scholar
Schofield, P., Pitt, R. E. and Pell, A.N. 1994. Kinetics of fibre digestion from in vitro gas production. Journal of Animal Science 72: 29802991.Google Scholar
Sherrod, P. H. 1992. NONLIN nonlinear regression analysis program. Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Sniffen, C. J., O’Connor, J. D., Soest, P. J., Fox, D. G., Russell, J. B. and Van Soest, P. J. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. 2. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70: 35623577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, fourth edition, volume 2. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill International Book Company, Singapore.Google Scholar
Stefanon, B., Pell, A. N. and Schofield, P. 1996. Effect of maturity on digestion kinetics of water-soluble and water insoluble fractions of alfalfa and brome hay. Journal of Animal Science 74: 11041111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamminga, S., Straalen, W. M.van, Subnel, A. P. J., Meijer, R. G. M., Steg, A., Wever, C. J. G. and Blok, M. C. 1994. The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Sciences 40: 139155.Google Scholar
Theodorou, M. K., Williams, B. A., Dhanoa, M. S., McAllan, A. B. and France, J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Peed Science and Technology 48: 185197.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Dellow, D. W., John, A., Reid, C. S. W. and Waghorn, G.C. 1986. Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the rumino-reticulum. In Control of digestion and metabolism in ruminants (ed. Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A.), pp. 498515. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Williams, B. A., Poel, A. F. B. van der, Boer, H. and Tamminga, S. 1995. The use of cumulative gas production to determine the effect of steam explosion on the fermentability of two substrates with different cell wall quality. Journal of the Science of Pood and Agriculture 69: 3339.Google Scholar
Zwietering, M. H., Jongenburger, I., Rombouts, F. M. and van’t Riet, K. 1990. Modelling of the bacterial growth curve. Applied Environmental Microbiology 56: 18751881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed