Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:39:06.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some factors related to the voluntary intake of silage by individual dairy cows housed as a group during two winter-feeding periods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. Little ,
R. Manston ,
J. I. D. Wilkinson  and
M. E. Tarrant
W. Little
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 0NN
R. Manston
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 0NN
J. I. D. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Lilly Research Centre Ltd, Erl Wood, Windlesham GU20 6PH
M. E. Tarrant
Affiliation:
Lilly Research Centre Ltd, Erl Wood, Windlesham GU20 6PH
Get access

Abstract

The consumption of grass silage by each individual cow in a group housed during two consecutive winter-feeding periods was continuously recorded. During the first winter, one of two concentrates, containing high starch or high fibre, were offered on a sliding scale and half the cows were injected with bovine somatotropin (bST). During the second winter, one of two concentrates, containing high or low rumen-undegradable protein were offered at a flat rate ivith two-thirds of the cows receiving bST. The cows injected with bST had significantly greater yields of milk but their consumption of silage was similar to that of cows not treated with bST. The type of concentrate offered had no significant effect on silage consumption. Although there were significant variations in the consumption of silage from day to day, there were highly significant variations in consumption attributable to individual cows. This individuality of intake persisted in a consistent manner throughout a feeding period and could not be explained on the basis of milk production, body weight, age or parity. In 24 of the cows which were used in both years, their individual intakes for the two periods were significantly correlated. The possibility that this individuality may be of economic importance is discussed.

Keywords

concentratesdairy cowsfood intakesilagesomatotropin
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , August 1991 , pp. 19 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderman, G., Broster, W. H., Strickland, M. J. and Johnson, C. L. 1982. The estimation of the energy value of liveweight change in the lactating dairy cow.Livestock Production Science 9: 665–673.Google Scholar
Curran, M. K., Wimble, R. H. and Holmes, W. 1970. Prediction of the voluntary intake of food by dairy cows. 1. Stall-fed cows in late pregnancy and early lactation. Animal Production 12: 195–212.Google Scholar
Downie, J. G. and Gelman, A. L. 1976. The relationship between changes in body weight, plasma glucose and fertility in beef cows. Veterinary Record 99: 210–212.Google Scholar
Ferrell, C. L. 1987. Selection for optimum feed intake and efficiency. Symposium Proceedings ‘Feed intake by beef cattle’, Oklahoma State University, November 1986, pp. 369–377.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L., Stockill, P. and Hoyle, B. S. 1986. A method for the automatic monitoring of food intake and feeding behaviour of individual cattle kept in a group. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 175–180.Google Scholar
Hewett, C. 1974. On causes and effects of variations in the blood profile of Swedish dairy cattle. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Supplementum 50, pp. 1–152.Google Scholar
Hunter, A. P. 1977. Some nutritional factors affecting the fertility of dairy cattle. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 25: 305–307.Google Scholar
Journet, M. 1983. Capacite d'ingestion des vaches laitieres. Bulletin Technique, Centre de Recherches Zootechniques et Veterinaires des Theix, No. 53, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
Kitchenham, B. A., Rowlands, G. J. and Shorbagi, H. 1975. Relationships of concentrations of certain blood constituents with milk yield and age of cows in dairy herds. Research in Dairy Science 18: 249–252.Google Scholar
Krohn, C. C. and Konggaard, S. P. 1976. Feed intake and social behaviour among group-fed cows in loose housing. 2. Factors affecting individual intake of grass silage given to appetite. Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg 441: 26.Google Scholar
Little, W. and Harrison, R. D. 1984. Some observations on the behaviour of dairy cattle-activated out-of-parlour concentrate dispensers. Journal of Dairy Research 51: 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E. 1983. Predicting dry matter intake in ruminants. Proceedings of the 1983 Georgia Nutrition Conference for the Feed Industry, University of Georgia, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Reference Book 433. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mulvany, P. 1977. Dairy cow condition scoring. National Institute for Research in Dairying, Paper No. 4468. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Oldenbroek, J. K. 1988. Feed intake and energy utilization in dairy cows of different breeds. Thesis, Landbouwuniversiteit te Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Pauka, A. 1972. Feed requirements of dry and lactating cows. Latyijas Lauksaimniecibas Akademijas Raksti 57: 28–36.Google Scholar
Rees, C. P. 1986. A method for the automatic recording of the eating behaviour, intake and live weight of individual cows housed in groups. Animal Production 42: 457–458(Abstr.).Google Scholar
Stark, A. J., Rowlands, G. J., Manston, R. and McClintock, A. E. 1978. The blood composition of Friesian bulls; variations with age and relationships with results of progeny tests. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91: 579–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS users guide: statistics, version 5 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. and Reid, J. T. 1965. Prediction of the energy value of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 1215–1223.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. S. H. 1978. Feed evaluation for ruminants. I. The systems in use from May 1977 onwards in the Netherlands. Livestock Production Science 5: 331–345.Google Scholar