Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Engel, B.
and
Walstra, P.
1993.
Accounting for subpopulations in prediction of the proportion of lean meat of pig carcasses.
Animal Science,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
147.
Hulsegge, B.
Sterrenburg, P.
and
Merkus, G. S. M.
1994.
Prediction of lean meat proportion in pig carcasses and in the major cuts from multiple measurements made with the Hennessy Grading Probe.
Animal Science,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Hulsegge, B.
and
Merkus, G. S. M.
1997.
A comparison of the optical probe HGP and the ultrasonic devices Renco and Pie Medical for estimation of the lean meat proportion in pig carcasses.
Animal Science,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 2,
p.
379.
Blanchard, P. J.
Warkup, C. C.
Ellis, M.
Willis, M. B.
and
Avery, P.
1999.
The influence of the proportion of Duroc genes on growth, carcass and pork eating quality characteristics.
Animal Science,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 3,
p.
495.
Blanchard, P. J.
Ellis, M.
Warkup, C. C.
Hardy, B.
Chadwick, J. P.
and
Deans, G. A.
1999.
The influence of rate of lean and fat tissue development on pork eating quality.
Animal Science,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 3,
p.
477.
Blanchard, P. J.
Ellis, M.
Warkup, C. C.
Chadwick, J. P.
and
Willis, M. B.
1999.
The influence of sex (boars and gilts) on growth, carcass and pork eating quality characteristics.
Animal Science,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 3,
p.
487.
Hulsegge, B.
Merkus, G. S. M.
and
Walstra, P.
2000.
Prediction of lean meat proportion based on ultrasonic backfat thickness measurements of live pigs.
Animal Science,
Vol. 71,
Issue. 2,
p.
253.
Zeng, X.Y
Turkstra, J.A
Jongbloed, A.W
van Diepen, J.Th.M
Meloen, R.H
Oonk, H.B
Guo, D.Z
and
van de Wiel, D.F.M
2002.
Performance and hormone levels of immunocastrated, surgically castrated and intact male pigs fed ad libitum high- and low-energy diets.
Livestock Production Science,
Vol. 77,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Engel, B.
Buist, W.G.
Walstra, P.
Olsen, E.
and
Daumas, G.
2003.
Accuracy of prediction of percentage lean meat and authorization of carcass measurement instruments: adverse effects of incorrect sampling of carcasses in pig classification.
Animal Science,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 2,
p.
199.
Engel, B.
G. Buist, W.
Font i Furnols, M.
and
Lambooij, E.
2004.
Subpopulations and accuracy of prediction in pig carcass classification.
Animal Science,
Vol. 78,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Vališ, L.
Pulkrábek, J.
Pavlík, J.
Vítek, M.
and
Wolf, J.
2005.
Conformation and meatiness of pork belly.
Czech Journal of Animal Science,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 3,
p.
116.
Engel, B.
Lambooij, E.
Buist, W. G.
Reimert, H.
and
Mateman, G.
2006.
Prediction of the percentage lean of pig carcasses with a small or a large number of instrumental carcass measurements – an illustration with HGP and Vision.
Animal Science,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 6,
p.
919.
Pulkrábek, J.
Pavlík, J.
Vališ, L.
and
Vítek, M.
2006.
Pig carcass quality in relation to carcass lean meat proportion.
Czech Journal of Animal Science,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 1,
p.
18.
Kernerová, N.
Václavovský, J.
Matoušek, V.
and
Hanyková, Z.
2006.
The use of performance test parameters for selection of gilts before their placement into breeding.
Czech Journal of Animal Science,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 6,
p.
253.
Šprysl, M.
Čítek, J.
Stupka, R.
Vališ, L.
and
Vítek, M.
2007.
The accuracy of FOM instrument used in on-line pig carcass classification in the Czech Republic.
Czech Journal of Animal Science,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 6,
p.
149.