Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:19:39.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection for high and low prolificacy in Cambridge sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. Ap Dewi ,
J. B. Owen ,
R. F. E. Axford  and
M. T. Beigi-Nassiri
I. Ap Dewi
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW
J. B. Owen
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW
R. F. E. Axford
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW
M. T. Beigi-Nassiri
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW
Get access

Abstract

Previous reports have suggested the presence of a major gene influencing prolificacy in the Cambridge sheep breed. To estimate the effect of such a gene, high and low prolificacy groups were established in a Cambridge sheep flock between lambing years 1990 and 1993. In 1990-1991 ovulation rate (OR) was used as the basis for allocating ewes into groups but for 1992-1993 litter size was used also as a secondary selection criterion. In 1990 and 1991 small groups (each with one ram) of extreme phenotype were formed. In 1992 and 1993, six high and six low groups were formed using all available ewes, increasing the number of observations but with less selection pressure for high and low prolificacy. Results from the groups were interpreted on the basis of a major gene with additive effect resulting in three distinct genotypes (CC, Cc and cc). It was assumed, because of the selection method adopted, that CC ewes were exclusively in the high groups, heterozygotes (Cc) were distributed between the high and low groups and that cc ewes were exclusively in the low groups. In 1990-1991 there was a difference in OR of 4·0 between ewes allocated to the high and low groups. In 1992-1993 the difference was 1·9. Litter size differences between groups averaged 0·73. Whilst the high group progeny had higher OR, the differences between groups were less than differences observed between groups based on selected dam records, possibly a reflexion of the young age at which progeny records were collected. Differences between the high and low groups suggest a gene effect for adult ewes of approximately 2·0, with expected OR, above a basal level of 2·0, of 4·0 and 6·0 for heterozygous and homozygous carriers respectively. The effect of the gene in young ewes (predominantly 1 to 2 years) was approximately 0·8.

Keywords

litter sizemajor genesovulation rateprolificacyselectionsheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , October 1997 , pp. 209 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ap Dewi, I., Owen, J. B., Axford, R. F. E. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1995. Variation in progeny performance of prolific ewes of extreme phenotype. Animal Science 60: 522 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ap Dewi, I., Owen, J. B., El-Sheikh, A., Axford, R. F. E. and Beigi-Nassiri, M. 1996. Variation in ovulation rate and litter size of Cambridge sheep. Animal Science 62:489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banoin, M., Mariana, J. C, Hanrahan, J. P. and Yenikoye, A. 1991. Comparison of the effects of FSH, immunization against androstenedione and genetic differences in ovulation rate on follicular growth in adult Finn sheep. Animal Reproduction Science 26:115–128.Google Scholar
Bindon, B. M., Piper, L. R., Cummins, L. J. and O'Shea, T. 1984. The genetics of sheep fecundity. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Bindon, B. M., Piper, L. R., Hillard, M. A., O'Shea, T. and Findlay, J. K. 1991. Endocrine basis of prolificacy in the Booroola Merino. Isotope aided studies on sheep and goat production in the tropics. Proceedings of the final coordination meeting, Perth, Australia, 20-24 February 1989 on improving sheep and goat productivity with the aid of nuclear techniques,pp. 1–12. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Bodin, L., Cornu, C, Elsen, J. M., Molenat, G. and Thimonier, J. 1991a. The effect of Booroola genotype on some traits in a Merinos d'Aries flock. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 371–379. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Bodin, L., Driancourt, M. A., Elsen, J. M., Thimonier, J. and Boomarov. 1991b. Comparison of ovulations induced by HCG and PMSG in prepubertal Booroola ewe lambs and relationships with their natural adult ovulation rate. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thominier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 161–166. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Bradford, G. E., Inounu, I., Iniguez, L. C, Tiesnamurti, B. and Thomas, D. L. 1991. The prolificacy gene of Javanese sheep. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 67–73. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Bunge, R., Thomas, D. L. and Nash, T. G. 1993. Performance of hair breeds and prolific wool breeds of sheep in southern Illinois: lamb production of Fl ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 2012–2017.Google Scholar
Davis, G. H., Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L., Fahmy, M. H., Castonguay, F., Gootwine, E., Bor, A., Braw Tal, R., Greeff, J. C, Lengyel, A., Paszthy, G. and Cummins, L. 1991a. A comparison of the production from Booroola and local breed sheep in different countries. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 315–323. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Davis, G. H., McEwan, J. C, Fennessy, P. F., Dodds, K. G. and Farquhar, P. A. 1991b. Evidence for the presence of a major gene influencing ovulation rate on the X-chromosome of sheep. Biology of Reproduction 44: 620–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. H., McEwan, J. C, Fennessy, P. F., Dodds, K. G., McNatty, K. P. and O, W. S. 1992. Infertility due to bilateral ovarian hypoplasia in sheep homozygous (FecXI-FecXI) for the Inverdale prolificacy gene located on the X-chromosome. Biology of Reproduction 46: 636–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. H., Montgomery, G. W., Allison, A. J., Kelly, R. W. and Bray, A. R. 1982. Segregation of a major gene influencing fecundity in progeny of Booroola sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 25:525–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. H., Shackell, G. H. and Kyle, S. E. 1991c. A putative major gene for prolificacy in Romney sheep. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 61–65. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Dodds, K. G., Davis, G. H., Elsen, J. M., Isaacs, K. L. and Owens, J. L. 1991. The effect of Booroola genotype on some reproductive traits in a Booroola Merino flock. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 359–366. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Driancourt, M. A., Gastonguay, F., Bindon, B. M., Piper, L. R., Quirke, J. F. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1990. Ovarian follicular dynamics in lines of sheep (Finn, Merinos) selected on ovulation rate. Journal of Animal Science 68: 2034–2041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eythorsdottir, E., Adalsteinsson, S., Jonmundson, J. V. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1991. Research work on the Icelandic Thoka gene. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 75–84. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. H. 1990. Follicle number and uterine measurements in crossbred Finnish Landrace and other ewe lambs, fed at a high or low level and slaughtered at different ages and weights. Bulletin of Agriculture Canada, research branch, no. 13, pp. 25–28.Google Scholar
Fogarty, N. M. and Hall, D. G. 1995. Performance of crossbred progeny of Trangie Fertility Merino and Booroola Merino rams and Poll Dorset ewes. 3. Reproduction, liveweight and wool production of adult ewes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35:1083–1091.Google Scholar
Gootwine, E., Braw-Tal, R., Shalhevet, D., Bor, A. and Zenou, A. 1993. Reproductive performance of Assaf and Booroola-Assaf crossbred ewes and its association with plasma FSH levels and induced ovulation rate measured at prepuberty. Animal Reproduction Science 31:69–81.Google Scholar
Gray, A. J. and Davis, H. H. 1995. Commercial performance of sheep carrying the Inverdale gene (FecX). Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 55: 294–295.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, J. P. 1991. Evidence for single gene effects on ovulation rate in the Cambridge and Belclare breeds. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 93–102. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, J. P. and Owen, J. B. 1985. Variation and repeatability of ovulation rate in Cambridge ewes. Animal Production 40: 529 (abstr.)Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1990. User's guide for LSMLMW and MIXMDL PC, version 2.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B., Russel, A. J. F., Wolf, B. T. and Beck, N. F. G. 1990. Crossing experiments with the Thoka gene from Icelandic sheep. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. XV, pp. 123–126.Google Scholar
Laundau, S., Bor, A., Leibovitch, H., Zoref, Z., Nitsan, Z. and Madar, Z. 1995. The effect of ruminal starch degradability in the diet of Booroola crossbred ewes on induced ovulation rate and prolificacy. Animal Reproduction Science 38: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logue, D. N., Gill, A., MacAuslan, J., Waterhouse, A., Boyd, J. S. and Harvey, M. J. A. 1990. The incorporation of the ‘Booroola gene’ into the Texel breed of sheep. In New developments in sheep production (ed. Slade, C. F. R. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), occasional publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 14, pp. 136–137.Google Scholar
McEwan, J. C, Davis, G. H., Dodds, K. G., Fennessy, P. F., Clarke, J. N., Bruce, G. D. and Hishon, M. G. 1992. Comparison of growth, hogget fleece weight and reproductive traits of three sheep breeds from a flock selected for prolificacy and a Romney control flock. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 52: 211–215.Google Scholar
McNatty, K. P., Henderson, K. M., Fleming, J. S., Price, C. A. and Clarke, I. J. 1990. How does the F gene influence ovulation rates in Booroola ewes? A 1990 perspective. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 50:135–140.Google Scholar
McNatty, K. P., Lun, S., Heath, D. A. and O'Keeffe, L. E. 1987. Ovarian follicular activity in Booroola lambs with and without a fecundity gene. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 79: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martyniuk, E. 1996. Reproduction performance in Olkuska sheep — three years of experience in the newly established Zelazna flock. Animal science papers and reports, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Jastrzebiec, vol. 14, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
Moraes, J. C. F., Oliveira, N. M. de, Selaive Villarroel, A. and De Oliveira, N. M. 1991. Evaluation of three criteria used to identify F-gene carriers in a Romney × Merino Booroola sheep flock in south Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Genetica 14:983–989.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. 1996. The Cambridge breed. In Prolific sheep (ed. Fahmy, M. H.), pp. 161–177. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. and Ap Dewi, I. 1988. The Cambridge sheep — its exploitation for increased efficiency of lamb production. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 60: 585–590.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Whitaker, C. J., Axford, R. F. E. and Ap Dewi, I. 1990. Expected consequences of the segregation of a major gene in a sheep population in relation to observations on the ovulation rate of a flock of Cambridge sheep. Animal Production 51: 277–282.Google Scholar
Piper, L. R., Bindon, B. M. and Davies, R. H. 1985. The single gene inheritance of the higher litter size of the Booroola Merino. In Genetics of reproduction in sheep (Land, ed. R. B. and Robinson, D. W.). Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Schoenian, S. G. and Burfening, P. J. 1990. Ovulation rate, lambing rate, litter size and embryo survival of Rambouillet sheep selected for high and low reproductive rate. Journal of Animal Science 68:2263–2270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, D. L., Nash, T. G., Ali, Z. and Dzuik, P. J. 1991. Induced ovulation rate with various compounds as a criterion for determining presence or absence of the Booroola Merino "F" gene in prepubertal ewe lambs. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), second international workshop, Toulouse, July 16-18,1990, pp. 155–160. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Webb, R., Gauld, I. K. and Driancourt, M. A. 1989. Morphological and functional characterization of large antral follicles in three breeds of sheep with different ovulation rates. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 87: 243–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed