Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:06:07.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal grouping in a herd-year-season model of sire evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

V. P. S. Chauhan
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Get access

Abstract

Analyses of variance were conducted using two separate random sets of data (25 158 and 24 084 records) on first-lactation, milk-production records of progeny of 69 British Friesian-Holstein proven sires in order to examine the criteria of seasonal grouping for a sire-evaluation model fitting herd-year-season as a fixed effect. Five different seasonal groupings were chosen each comprising two or three seasons with equal or unequal number of months and with different trends in production within season.

The smallest herd-year × month of calving within-season interaction, smallest residual variance, largest effective number of daughters and smallest among-months, within-season variation were considered to be the appropriate criteria of seasonal grouping. None of the groupings examined satisfied all criteria. However, a small herd-year × month within season interaction and all small within-season variation would be desirable if milk records were pre-corrected for the effect of month of calving in sire evaluation, and the effective number of daughters should be large. Given this the grouping currently used in Britain (three seasons: December to March, April to July and August to November) was considered to be appropriate, although a grouping with two seasons: February to July and August to January gave similar results. The regional differences in production were observed to be large, but the region × month-of-calving interaction was small.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auran, T. 1973. Studies on monthly and cumulative monthly milk yield records. 1. The effect of age, month of calving, herd and length of first test period. Ada Agricultural Scandinavica 23: 189199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereskin, B. and Freeman, A. E. 1965. Genetic and environmental factors in dairy sire evaluation. 1. Effects of herds, months and year-seasons on variance among lactation records; repeatability and heritability. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 347351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, V. P. S. 1986. Dairy sire evaluation fitting some of the herd-year-season effects as random. Livestock Production Science. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. B. and Hargrove, G. L. 1982. Age month of calving adjustments of Holstein protein, milk and fat lactation yields. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 16731678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gacula, M. C. Jr, Gaunt, S. N. and Damon, R. A. Jr 1968. Genetic and environmental parameters of milk constituents for five breeds. 1. Effects of herd, year, season and age of cow. Journal of Dairy Science 51: 428437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunt, S. N., Bartlett, M. A. G. and Comstock, W. L. 1964. Comparison of five methods of adjusting for environmental differences in evaluation of dairy sires. Journal of Dairy Science 47: 12431248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1977. User's guide for LSML76. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State and University, Columbus, (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Harville, D. A. and Henderson, C. R. 1967. Estimates of variance components associated with the first-lactations of New York State Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 985986 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. Proceedings of Animal breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honor of Dr. J. L. Lush, pp. 1041. American Society of Animal Production, Champaign,Google Scholar
Hickman, C. G. and Henderson, C. R. 1955. Components of the relationship between level of production and rate of maturity in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 38: 883890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. J. 1974. Month, year and herd effects on age adjustment of first lactation milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science 57: 332338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, I. L., Burnside, E. B., Wilton, J. W. and Freeman, M. G. 1974. Age-month adjustment of Canadian dairy production records. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54: 533541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1984. Dairy Progeny Testing Scheme (Friesians/Holsteins). Report of the Breeding and Production Organisation of the Milk Marketing Board, No. 34, pp. 4445.Google Scholar
Miller, P. D., Lentz, W. E. and Henderson, C. R. 1970. Joint influence of month and age of calving on milk yield of Holstein cows in the Northeastern United States. Journal of Dairy Science 53: 351357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, H. D., Kuck, A. L., Cassell, B. G. and Dickinson, F. N. 1978. Effect of age and month-of-calving on solids-not-fat and protein yield for five dairy breeds. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 239245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. and Rendel, J. M. 1954. The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 44: 184192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. G. 1927. The variation in milk yields caused by season of the year, service, age, and dry period, and their elimination. Part I. Season of the year. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 17: 339379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, F. D., Butcher, K. R. and Legates, J. E. 1967. Environmental influences on milk constituents. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 177184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, W. L. and Legates, J. E. 1962. Effective use of herd-mates in dairy sire evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 21: 976 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Van Vleck, L. D., Wadell, L. H. and Henderson, C. R. 1961. Components of variance associated with milk fat records of artificially sired Holstein daughters. Journal of Animal Science 20: 812816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, P. D. P. 1970. The relationship between the month of calving and milk production. Animal Production 12: 253259.Google Scholar