Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:57:00.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses to supplementation by dairy cows given low pasture allowances in different seasons 2. Milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. W. Penno ,
K. A. Macdonald ,
C. W. Holmes ,
S. R. Davis ,
G. F. Wilson ,
I. M. Brookes  and
E. R. Thom
J. W. Penno
Affiliation:
Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand
K. A. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand
C. W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
S. R. Davis
Affiliation:
ViaLactia Biosciences (NZ Ltd), PO Box 109-185, Auckland, New Zealand
G. F. Wilson
Affiliation:
Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
I. M. Brookes
Affiliation:
Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
E. R. Thom*
Affiliation:
Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand
*
†Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two factorial experiments were designed to determine the effects of stage of lactation, and season of the year, on cow responses to supplementary feeding. These experiments were conducted over consecutive years with 128 high genetic merit multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows in early, mid and late lactation in spring, summer, autumn and winter. At each stage of lactation, and in each season of the year, cows were offered a restricted pasture allowance (25 to 35 kg dry matter (DM) per cow per day), either unsupplemented (control) or with supplement at 50 MJ metabolizable energy (ME) per cow per day in experiment 1 and 80 MJ ME per cow per day in experiment 2. The two supplements given in both years were rolled maize grain (MG) and a mixture of foods formulated to nutritionally balance the diet (BR). In experiment 2, another treatment, of a generous pasture allowance (60 to 75 kg DM per cow per day) (AP), was imposed on an additional group of early lactation cows during each season. Direct milk solids (MS) (milk fat plus milk protein) responses in experiment 1 to MG were 169, 279, 195 and 251 g MS per cow per day in spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively, while those to BR were 107, 250, 192, 289 g MS per cow per day. In experiment 2, however, milk solids responses to both supplements during spring were slightly below the control treatment, with values similar to those in experiment 1 in summer and autumn for cows on the BR but not the MG supplement. Milk solids responses to supplementary foods were largest during seasons of the year when the quantity and quality of pasture on offer resulted in the lowest milk solids yield from unsupplemented cows. When carry-over effects of feeding MG and BR on milk solids production were detected, they were only about half the magnitude of the direct effects. Serum urea concentrations were higher in control cows than those offered MG with a similar effect for BR in all but summer in experiment 1, while serum glucose concentrations were highest in winter and lowest in summer. The most important factor influencing milk solids responses was the relative food deficit (RFD) represented by the decline in milk solids yield of the respective control groups after changing from a generous pasture allowance to restricted allowance when the feeding treatments were imposed. Total milk solids responses (direct and carry-over) to supplements were greatest when severe food restrictions, relative to the cows' current food demand, resulted in large reductions in milk solids yield of the control groups. The RFD was the best predictor of milk solids response to supplementary foods. Therefore, it is likely that cows are most responsive to supplementary foods during or immediately after the imposition of a severe food restriction.

Keywords

dairy cowsgrazingmilk productionsupplementary feedingtotal solids
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 82 , Issue 5 , October 2006 , pp. 671 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auldist, M. J., Walsh, B. J. and Thomson, N. A. 1998. Seasonal and lactational influences on bovine milk composition in New Zealand. Journal of Dairy Research 65: 401–411.Google Scholar
Bilodeau, P. P., Petitclerc, D., Pierre, N.St., Pelletier, G. and Laurent, G. J.St. 1989. Effects of photoperiod and pair-feeding on lactation of cows fed corn or barley grain in total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 2999–3005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookes, I. M. 1984. Effects of formaldehyde-treated and untreated casein supplements on performance of dairy cows offered ryegrass-clover pastures. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 27: 491–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Broster, V. J. 1984. Long term effects of plane of nutrition on the performance of the dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science 51: 149–196.Google ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H. and Thomas, C. 1981. The influence of level and pattern of concentrate input on milk output. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 49–69. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, A. M. and Trigg, T. E. 1982. The nutrition of the grazing dairy cow in early lactation. In Dairy production from pasture (ed. Macmillan, K. L., Taufa, V. K.), pp. 185–207. Clark and Matheson Ltd, Hamilton.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. 1993. Silage for milk production. Proceedings of the Ruakura farmers’ conference, vol. 45, pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
Edwards, N. J. and Parker, W. J. 1994. Increasing per cow milk solids production in a pasture-based dairy system by manipulating the diet: a review. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 54: 267–273.Google Scholar
Garcia, S. C. and Holmes, C. W. 1999. Effects of time of calving on the productivity of pasture-based dairying systems: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 42: 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat Committee 1997. Genstat for Windows command language manual, third edition, release 4.2b. Rothamstead Experimental Station, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Grainger, C. 1990. Effect of stage of lactation and feeding level on milk yield response by stall-fed dairy cows to change in pasture intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30: 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. W. 1987. Pastures for dairy cows. In Livestock feeding on pasture (ed. Nicol, A. M.), New Zealand Society of Animal Production occasional publication no. 10, pp. 133–143.Google Scholar
Kellaway, R. C. and Porta, S. 1993. Factors affecting the response to supplementation. In Feeding concentrates: supplements for dairy cows (ed. Hopkins, R.), pp. 117–147. Agmedia, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Kolver, E. S., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. and Cassidy, T. J. 1998. Synchronization of ruminal degradation of supplemental carbohydrate with pasture nitrogen in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2017–2028.Google Scholar
Lean, I. J., Parker, W. J. and Kellaway, R. C. 1996. Improving the efficiency of pasture-based dairying. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 56: 270–275.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. and Holmes, W. 1968. The use of supplementary feeds for grazing dairy cows. Dairy Science Abstracts 30: 355–361.Google Scholar
Macdonald, K. A., Penno, J. W., Kolver, E. S., Carter, W. A. and Lancaster, J. A. 1998. Balancing pasture and maize silage diets for dairy cows using urea, soybean meal, or fishmeal. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 58: 102–105.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1981. The effect of feeding protected and unprotected casein on the milk production of cows grazing ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96: 239–241.Google Scholar
National Research Council 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, sixth revised edition. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. and Emmans, G. C. 1989. Prediction of responses to required nutrients in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 3212–3229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. and McDonald, I. 1981. The effects of protein degradability and food intake on milk yield and composition in cows in early lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 45: 547–555.Google Scholar
Penno, J. W. 2002. The response by grazing dairy cows to supplementary feeds. Ph.D. thesis, Massey University, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Penno, J. W., Thomson, N. A. and Bryant, A. M. 1995a. Summer milk – supplementary feeding. Proceedings of the Ruakura farmers’ conference, vol 47, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Penno, J. W., Bryant, A. M., Carter, W. A. and Macdonald, K. A. 1995b. Effects of fishmeal supplementation to high genetic merit cows grazing temperate spring pastures in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 78: (suppl. 1) 295.Google Scholar
Penno, J. W., Macdonald, K. A., Holmes, C. W., Davis, S. R., Wilson, G. F., Brookes, I. M. and Thom, E. R. 2006. Responses to supplementation by dairy cows given low pasture allowances in different seasons. 1. Pasture intake and substitution. Animal Science 82: 661–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. R., Chapin, L. T., Emery, R. S. and Tucker, H. A. 1981. Milk yield, feed intake, prolactin, growth hormone, and glucocorticoid response of cows to supplemented light. Journal of Dairy Science 64: 1671–1678.Google Scholar
Robaina, A. C., Grainger, C., Moate, P., Taylor, J. and Stewart, J. 1998. Responses to grain feeding by grazing dairy cows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38: 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G. L., Porter, R. H.D., Clarke, T. and Stewart, J. A. 1980. Effect of protected casein supplements on pasture intake, milk yield and composition of cows in early lactation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31: 1147–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusdi Van Houtert, M. F.J. 1997. Responses to protected amino acids or protected protein in dairy cows grazing ryegrass pastures in early or late lactation. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 57: 120–125.Google Scholar
Stockdale, C. R. 1999. The nutritive characteristics of herbage consumed by grazing dairy cows affect milk yield responses obtained from concentrate supplementation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39: 379–387.Google Scholar
Stockdale, C. R., Callaghan, A. and Trigg, T. E. 1987. Feeding high energy supplements to pasture-fed dairy cows. Effects of stage of lactation and level of supplement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38: 927–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockdale, C. R. and Dellow, D. W. 1995. The productivity of lactating cows grazing white clover and supplemented with maize silage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46: 1205–1217.Google Scholar
Stockdale, C. R., Dellow, D. W., Grainger, C., Dalley, D. and Moate, P. J. 1997. Supplements for dairy production in Victoria. Dairy Research and Development Corporation, Glen Iris, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Stockdale, C. R. and Trigg, T. E. 1989. Effect of feeding levels on the responses of lactating dairy cattle to high energy supplements. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 29: 605–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, P. F. 1997. Data Desk, statistics guide, version 6. Data Description, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar