Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:48:18.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to within-family selection in a small closed pig herd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. M. MacIver
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access

Summary

Two lines of Large White pigs were selected for increased rate of growth and decreased backfat thickness respectively over five generations. Each line was bred from four boars, each mated to four gilts per generation, these being selected on a within-family basis to minimize inbreeding. Response to selection was measured by direct comparison with contemporary control stock. The control line, originating from the same foundation stock as the selection lines, consisted of 15 groups of one boar and two gilts, mating between groups being designed to reduce the rate of inbreeding.

Over three generations the control stock exhibited random variation in the traits measured except rate of daily live-weight gain and backfat thickness ‘K’. The evidence suggests that the time trend in these was mainly, if not entirely, non-genetic in nature.

The low rate of progress achieved in both lines is ascribed to the selection method adopted and to losses of potential breeding stock. It is concluded that the success of such a small-scale breeding operation is dependent on achieving optimum husbandry conditions, and even then it cannot achieve the same rate of progress as in larger herds. The necessity of using a control strain to assess genetic progress in experiments of this nature is emphasized.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dickerson, G. E., Blunn, C. T., Chapman, A. B., Kottman, R. M., Krider, J. L., Warwick, E. J. and Whatley, J. A. (Jr) in collaboration with Baker, M. L., Lush, J. L. and Winters, L. M. 1954. Evaluation of selection in developing inbred lines of swine. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 551.Google Scholar
Duckworth, J. E. and Holmes, W. 1968. Selection for carcass length in Large White pigs. Anim. Prod. 10: 359372.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1968. The Farm as a Business. 4. Aids to Management: Pigs. 2nd ed. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Smith, C., King, J. W. B. and Gilbert, N. 1962. Genetic parameters of British Large White bacon pigs. Anim. Prod. 4: 128143.Google Scholar
Smith, C. and Ross, G. J. S. 1965. Genetic parameters of British Landrace bacon pigs. Anim. Prod. 7: 291301.Google Scholar