Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T18:38:23.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The response of lactating sows and their litters to different dietary energy allowances. 2. Weight changes and carcass composition of sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. F. O'Grady ,
F. W. H. Elsley ,
R. M. MacPherson  and
I. McDonald
J. F. O'Grady
Affiliation:
An Foras Talúntais, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Ireland
F. W. H. Elsley
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
R. M. MacPherson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
I. McDonald
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

The live-weight changes of 48 sows were recorded over three reproductive cycles. All sows were given standard amounts of feed in gestation and one of four energy allowances during lactation. The daily intakes of digestible energy during lactation ranged from 12·2 to 182·2 Meal in the first, 122·9 to 192·6 Meal in the second and 132·2 to 202·2 Meal in the third lactation. Weight change in lactation responded to energy intake; sows on the lowest energy intake lost weight whilst those on the highest intake gained. At weaning of their third litters, sows on the highest energy allowance weighed 44 kg more than those on the lowest level and this was equivalent to a carcass difference of 372·3 kg at slaughter.

All the sows were slaughtered after the third litters had been weaned and the carcasses were dissected into lean, subcutaneous fat+skin, and bone. Sows from all treatments had less subcutaneous fat+skin and more muscle and bone than non-pregnant gilts killed at a mean weight of 129 kg, a weight equivalent to that of the experimental animals at their first mating.

The reduction in fat reserves was linearly correlated with dietary energy intake of the sows. Sows receiving the lowest energy intake in lactation possessed fat reserves which were estimated to be only 25% as great as in gilts comparable to those used to initiate the experiment. This reduction in body reserves has implications with regard to the long-term effects of feeding lactating sows low intakes of energy during 6-week lactations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 257 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Elsley, F. W. H., Anderson, D. M., McDonald, I., MacPherson, R. M. and Smart, R. 1966. A comparison of live-weight changes, nitrogen retention and carcass composition of pregnant and non-pregnant gilts. Anim. Prod. 8: 391–400.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. and MacPherson, R. M. 1970. Some observations on the effect of extreme undernutrition in pregnancy on live-weight changes and reproductive performance of sows. Anim. Prod. 12: 374 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., MacPherson, R. M. and Lodge, G. A. 1968. The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. III. Body composition. Anim. Prod. 10: 149–156.Google Scholar
Hill, F. and O'carroll, F. M. 1962. The chemical composition of pig carcasses at pork, bacon and manufacturing weights. Ir. J. agric. Res. 1: 115–130.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Elsley, F. W. H. and MacPherson, R. M. 1966. The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. II. Changes in body weight. Anim. Prod. 8: 499–506.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. and McDonald, I. 1959. The relative influence of birth weight, milk consumption and supplementary food consumption upon the growth rates of suckling piglets. Anim. Prod. 1: 139–144.Google Scholar
MacPherson, R. M., Elsley, F. W. H. and Smart, R. I. 1969. The influence of dietary protein intake during lactation on the reproductive performance of sows. Anim. Prod. 11: 443–451.Google Scholar
O'grady, J. F. 1971. Level and source of protein in the diets of lactating sows. Ir. J. agric. Res. 10: 17–29.Google Scholar
O'Grady, J. F., Elsley, F. W. H., MacPherson, R. M. and McDonald, I. 1973. The response of lactating sows and their litters to different dietary energy allowances. 1. Milk yield and composition, reproductive performance of sows and growth rate of litters. Anim. Prod. 17: 65–74.Google Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E. and Jacquot, R. 1961. [Body changes caused by growth during pregnancy and lactation.] C. r. hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 253: 544–546.Google Scholar
ZivKovic, S. and Bowland, J. P. 1970. Influence of substituting higher fibre ingredients for corn on the digestibility of diets and performance of sows and litters. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 177–184.Google Scholar