Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:06:14.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive performance, growth and carcass characteristics of gilts mated at puberty, restricted in food intake during gestation and slaughtered post-partum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. I. Elliot ,
G. A. Lodge ,
A. Fortin  and
Elizabeth Larmond
J. I. Elliot
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada‡
G. A. Lodge
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada‡
A. Fortin
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada‡
Elizabeth Larmond
Affiliation:
Food Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada§
Get access

Abstract

Seventy-four Yorkshire gilts, mated at puberty, were used in three experiments to study the effect of severe food restriction, 0·45 kg/day for either the last 15 or 30 days of gestation, on reproductive performance, body-weight change, and carcass quality and meat acceptability. The objective of the experiments was to assess the feasibility of limiting weight gain during gestation to produce an acceptable carcass post-partum, within the market weight range of 55 to 90 kg. Age and weight at puberty averaged 170·3 days and 99·1 kg respectively. Litter size averaged 9·3 liveborn piglets at an average weight of 1·13 kg. The necessary reduction in weight gain during gestation to bring final carcass weight within the acceptable range was associated with a significant reduction in mean individual birth weight to below 1·0 kg. Sensory evaluation of loin and ham joints from mated and unmated gilts of market weight revealed no differences in juiciness or flavour but both loin and ham joints from maiden gilts were significantly more tender than those from gilts that had farrowed and from unmated controls of the same age as those that had farrowed

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 17 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, L. L. 1976. Factors affecting embryonic and fetal development in the pig. Proc. Int. Pig. Vet. Soc. 4th Int. Congr., Ames, la, p. D-24 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1978. The Canadian Hog Carcass Grading/Settlement System. Canadian Pork Council, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 11th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Baker, D. H., Becker, D. E., Norton, H. W., Sasse, C. E., Jensen, A. H. and Harmon, B. G. 1969. Reproductive performance and progeny development in swine as influenced by feed intake during pregnancy. J. Nutr. 97: 489–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1973. Meat production from pigs which have farrowed. 1. Reproductive performance and food conversion efficiency. Anim. Prod. 17: 305–315.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H., Cole, D. J. A. and Jennings, W. J. N. 1975. Meat production from pigs which have farrowed. 2. Carcass characteristics. Anim. Prod. 20: 123–131.Google Scholar
Elliot, J. I., King, G. J. and Robertson, H. A. 1980. Reproductive performance of the sow subsequent to weaning piglets at birth. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 60: 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, J. I. and Lodge, G. A. 1978. Severe feed restriction of the sow during late pregnancy. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 58: 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, P. R. 1973. Physical and economic considerations in breeding gilts for slaughter. In The Maiden Female—a Means of Increasing Meat Production (ed. Owen, J. B.), Proc. Symp. Sch. Agric, Univ. Aberd., 1972, pp. 28–68Google Scholar
Fortin, A. 1980. The effect of slaughter weight on the carcass characteristics of Yorkshire barrows and gilts. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 60: 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, D. W., Larmond, Elizabeth, Wolynetz, M. S. and Price, K. R. 1979. Piglet and pork production from gilts bred at puberty: chemical composition of the carcass and assessment of meat quality. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovell, F. D. DeB., MacPherson, R. M., Crofts, R. M. J. and Pennie, K. 1977. The effect of energy intake and mating weight on growth, carcass yield and litter size of female pigs. Anim. Prod. 25: 233–245.Google Scholar
Larmond, Elizabeth. 1977. Laboratory methods for sensory evaluation of foods. Agriculture Can. Publ., No. 1637.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Elsley, F. W. H. and MacPherson, R. M. 1966. The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. II. Changes in body weight. Anim. Prod. 8: 499–506.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., McDonald, I. and MacPherson, R. M. 1961. Weight changes in sows during pregnancy and lactation. Anim. Prod. 3: 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Voisey, P. W. and Hansen, H. 1967. A shear apparatus for meat tenderness evaluation. Fd Technol., Champaign 21: 355–360.Google Scholar
Wrathall, A. E. 1971. Prenatal survival in pigs. Part 1. Ovulation rate and its influence on prenatal survival and litter size in pigs, Rev. Ser. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Hlth, No. 9, p. 12.Google Scholar
Wrathall, A. E. 1975. Reproductive disorders in pigs, Rev. Ser. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Hlth, No. 11.Google Scholar
Zoiopoulos, P. E., Topps, J. H. and English, P. R. 1978. The characterization of body-weight losses in the newly weaned sow. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37: 77A (Abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed