Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:54:28.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relative influence of birth weight, milk consumption and supplementary food consumption upon the growth rates of suckling piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1959

G. A. Lodge
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
I. McDonald
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
Get access

Extract

1. Data from 208 piglets in 24 litters were examined to evaluate the relationships of weights at 3 and 8 weeks with birth weight and milk consumption within litters, and with these and creep-feed consumption between litters.

2. Of the total variation in 3-week weight within litters, 39% was associated with variation in birth weight, 67% with variation in milk consumption to 3 weeks, and 80% with these two factors combined. Of the total variation in 8-week weight within litters, 30% was associated with variation in birth weight, 25% with variation in milk consumption to 8 weeks, 42% with these two factors combined and 45% with variation in 3-week weight.

3. Of the total variation in 3-week weight between litters, 6% was associated with variation in birth weight, 15% with variation in milk consumption to 3 weeks, and 18% with these two factors together. These values were all too low to be statistically significant, as were the equivalent relationships with 8-week weight. Of the total variation in 8-week weight between litters, 77 % was associated with variation in creep-feed consumption to 8 weeks, 70% with variation in 3-week weight, 85% with consumptions to 8 weeks of milk and creep-feed combined, and 89 % with creep-feed consumption to 8 weeks and 3-week weight combined.

4. The practical significance of these relationships is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Djarparidse, D., 1933. Beitrag zur Frage des Einflusses einer verschiedenartigen Ernährung tragender Sauen auf die Entwicklung der Ferkel. J. f. Landwirtsch., 81: 249.Google Scholar
Donald, H., 1939. The relative importance of sow and litter during the growth of suckling pigs: a comparison of fostered with normally reared pigs. Emp. J. Exp. Agr., 7: 32.Google Scholar
Husby, M., 1933. [Statistical data concerning the pig stock used for experiments at the College of Agriculture (Norway).] Norg. Landbrukshogsk. Beretn. ForForsøk., No. 92 pp.Google Scholar
Jespersen, J., & Olsen, H., 1939. Experiments for the determination of the feed requirement of brood sows. 186. Beretn. Førsogslab. (Kbh.): 162. [English summary.]Google Scholar
Lodge, G., 1959. The energy requirements of lactating sows and the influence of food intake upon milk production and reproductive performance. J. agric. Sci. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohler, J., 1932. Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Animal Industry, Washington. P. 33.Google Scholar
Neumann, A., 1950. Observations of nutrition and its effect on baby pig mortality. Proc. Ass. Sth. agric. Wkrs, 47th Ann. Conf. 1950: 62.Google Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E., 1956. La mesure de la production laitiere chez la truie. With the technical collaboration of J. Rettagliati. Ann. Zootech. [Paris], 5: 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teague, H., & Wilson, R., 1957. Creep feeds for suckling pigs. Res. Circ. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., No. 46.Google Scholar
Teter, W., & Hanson, L., 1959. The influence of 3-week weight on 8-week weight of pigs weaned at 3 weeks of age. J. Anim. Sci., 18: 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L., Cummings, J., & Stewart, H., 1947. A study of factors affecting survival from birth to weaning and total weaning weight of the litter in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed