Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:20:34.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between pre-weaning growth, post-weaning growth and mature body size in Chios sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. P. Mavrogenis  and
A. Constantinou
A. P. Mavrogenis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
A. Constantinou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access

Abstract

The study examined early measures of growth and their relationships with mature body size. Data on 792 purebred females of the Chios breed, born and reared on two experimental farms between 1978 and 1986, were analysed. Pedigree information and records on live weight at birth, at weaning, 105 days of age and at first and subsequent matings was recorded. There were flock-year differences for all traits studied (P < 0·01) and birth type was important for all traits except post-weaning growth rate. Dam lactation number had no significant effect on birth weight and pre-weaning growth rate, but it significantly affected all subsequent weights and post-weaning growth rate. Estimated heritabilities increased with age and ranged from 0·13 (s.e. 0·14) (birth weight) to 0·30 (s.e. 0·15) (mature weight). Genetic correlations were generally positive between weights and growth traits. Phenotypic correlations were positive and followed the pattern of the genetic correlations. The results suggest that selection for 105-day weight will result in increased mature weight.

Keywords

body weightgrowth ratesheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 271 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkins, K. D. 1986. A genetic analysis of the components of lifetime productivity in Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal Production 43: 405–419.Google Scholar
Bacon, R. W. 1986. Effects of weight change in early life on mature weight and life productivity in hill sheep. In Agricultural Research and Development in Wales, 3rd Conference, Aberystwyth, p. 31.Google Scholar
Bichard, M. and Cooper, M. McG. 1966. Analysis of production records from a lowland sheep flock. 1. Lamb mortality and growth to 16 weeks. Animal Production 8: 401–410.Google Scholar
Bouillon, J. and Ricordhau, G. 1975. [Genetic parameters of growth and milk production in the goat at a testing station. Estimates of direct and indirect responses to selection.] Premiéres Journées de la Recherche Ovine et Caprine, Tome 1: Espece Caprine, pp 124–132. INRA-ITOVIC, Paris.Google Scholar
Ercanbrack, S. K. and Price, D. A. 1972. Selecting for weight and rate of gain in noninbred lambs. Journal of Animal Science 34: 713–725.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, H. A. 1972. Selection to change the shape of growth curves of beef cattle. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, PR-3121.Google Scholar
Gjedrem, T. 1967. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for weight of lambs at five ages. Ada Agricuhurae Scandinavica 17: 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunawan, B., James, J. W. and McGuirk, B. J. 1985. Genetic parameters for production traits in Border Leicester-Merino synthetic populations. Proceedings of 5th Conference of Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, pp. 234–235.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1975. Least-squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. US Department of Agriculture ARS H-4.Google Scholar
Lasslo, L. L., Bradford, G. E., Torell, D. T. and Kennedy, B. W. 1985. Selection for weaning weight in Targhee sheep in two environments. II. Correlated effects. Journal of Animal Science 61: 387–397.Google Scholar
Mathenge, J. M. 1981. Growth curve analysis of Rambouillet ewes. M. S. Thesis, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A. P., Constanttnou, A. and Louca, A. 1984. Environmental and genetic causes of variation in production traits of Damascus goats. 1. Prc-weaning and post-weaning growth. Animal Production 38: 91–97.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A. P. and Louca, A. 1979. A note on some factors influencing post-weaning performance of purebred and crossbred lambs. Animal Production 29: 415–418.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A. P., Louca, A. and Robison, O. W. 1980. Estimates of genetic parameters for pre-weaning and post-weaning growth traits of Chios lambs. Animal Production 30: 271–276.Google Scholar
Olsen, L. W., Dkkerson, G. E. and Glimp, H. A. 1976. Selection criteria for intensive market lamb production: growth traits. Journal of Animal Science 43: 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, A. H. and Bradford, G. E. 1965. Effects of environment on phenotypic and genetic variation in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 24: 766–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pattie, W. A. 1965. Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep. 2. Correlated responses in other production characteristics. Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 5: 361–368.Google Scholar
Ricordeau, G., Poujardieu, B. and Bouillon, J. 1972. [Genetic parameters of growth in young Saanen female goats at a testing station.] Annales de Génétique et de Sélection Animale 4: 477–480.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1964. The use of specialised sire and dam lines in selection for meat production. Animal Production 6: 337–344.Google Scholar
Stobart, R. H., Bassett, J. W., Cartwright, T. C. and Blackwell, R. L. 1986. An analysis of body weights and maturity patterns in Western range ewes. Journal of Animal Science 63: 729–740.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1969. Genetic variation in growth and development of cattle. In Growth and Development of Mammals (eds. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 267–291. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Terrill, C. E. 1951. Effectiveness of selection for economically important traits of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 10: 17–18 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thrift, F. A., Whiteman, J. V. and Kratzer, D. D. 1973. Genetic analysis of prcweaning and postweaning lamb growth traits. Journal of Animal Science 36: 640–643.Google Scholar
Vesfly, J. A. and Robison, O. W. 1970. Genotype-sex interactions in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 31: 273–277.Google Scholar