Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:50:32.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between cardio-respiratory parameters and draught work output in F1 crossbred dairy cows under field conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. Zerbini ,
T. Gemeda ,
D. H. O'Neill ,
P. J. Howell  and
R. C. Schroter
E. Zerbini
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
T. Gemeda
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural ResearchPO Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
D. H. O'Neill
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS
P. J. Howell
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS
R. C. Schroter
Affiliation:
Centre for Biological and Medical Systems, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ
Get access

Abstract

Cardio-respiratory and mechanical work output variables were measured for four F1 crossbred dairy cows (average weight 475 kg) over a range of work levels. Resting (standing prior to exercise) heart rates (average 62 beats per min) and respiratory rates (average 21 breaths per min) were similar to those previously reported for cattle of similar weight. Minute ventilation was 0·146 l/min per kg. Resting oxygen uptake (average 0·0057 l/min per kg) was higher than values that have been reported for cattle under more relaxed conditions.

The cows were exercised on an oval track by undertaking two bouts of activity for 500 m with a 5-min intervening recovery period. Walking increased minute ventilation by approximately 60 I/min and heart rate by 30 beats per min. Pulling a loaded sledge increased these variables further to approximately 200 l/min and 135 beats per min at 32 kg/min (530 W), the highest work level studied. The calculated oxygen pulse was 72 ml per heart beat, with maximum oxygen consumption approximately 9 l/min.

Overall ivorking efficiency increased with work level to a maximum of approximately 26% at the highest work level. At this level the cows were pulling proportionately about 0·14 of their body weight.

During periods of recovery after work, the cardio-respiratory parameters varied as would be expected and recovery was usually complete within 7 min.

Keywords

dairy cowsdraught animalsoxygen consumptiontractive efficiency
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , August 1992 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Bamaulin, A., Foulkes, D. and Fletcher, I. C. 1987. Preliminary observations on the effect of work on intake digestibility growth and ovarian activity in swamp buffalo cows. Draught animal power project bulletin, no. 3. James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.Google Scholar
Barwell, I. and Ayre, M. 1982. The harnessing of draught animals. Intermediate Technology Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, N. K. and Singh, Khub. 1987. Comparison of draftability of crossbred and indigenous cattle and variation in their physiological responses during work. In Utilisation and economics of draught animal power (ed. Srivastava, N. S. L. and Ojha, T. P.), proceedings of the national seminar on status of animal energy utilisation, Bhopal, India. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal.Google Scholar
Brody, S. 1964. Bioenergetics and growth. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
Centre d'Etudes et d'Experimentation du Machinisme Agricole Tropical/Food and Agriculture Organisation. 1972. The employment of draught animals in agriculture. CEEMAT/FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Grandjean, E. 1980. Fitting the task to the man. An ergonomic approach. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Grysseels, G., Anderson, F. M. and Durkin, J. W. 1986. Draught and smallholder grain production in the Ethiopian highlands. ILCA Newsletter 5: (4), 5–7.Google Scholar
Hales, J. R. S. and Findlay, J. D. 1968. Respiration of the ox: values and the effect of exposure to hot environments. Respiration physiology 4, pp. 333–352. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hall, W. C. and Brody, S. 1934. Research bulletin, Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, no. 208.Google Scholar
Hornicke, H., Ehrlein, H. J., Tolkmitt, G., Nagel, M., Epple, E., Decker, D., Kimmich, H. P. and Kreuzer, F. 1974. Methods for continuous oxygen consumption measurement in exercising horses by telemetry and electronic data processing. 6th symposium on energy metabolism of farm animals, European Association for Animal Production publication no. 24, pp. 257–260.Google Scholar
Howell, P. J. L. and Paice, M. E. R. 1989. An adaptive data logger for animal power studies. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 42:111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabbar, M. A. 1983. Effect of draught use of cows on fertility milk production and consumption. Maximum livestock production from minimum land (ed. Davis, C. H., Preston, T. R., Haque, M. and Saadullah, M.), proceedings of the fourth seminar Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
Jainudeen, M. R. 1985. Reproduction of draught animals: does work affect female fertility? In Draught animal poioer for production (ed. Copland, J. W.), international workshop on draught animal power for production, Townsville, ACIAR proceedings series no. 10, pp. 130–133. ACIAR, Canberra.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. C, Barker, B. O., Anderson, M. J. and Walters, J. L. 1979. Effect of forced exercise on two-year-old holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 1791–1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. R., Buck, S. F. and Campbell, I. 1989. The metabolic rate of oxen after work. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 48: 153A (abstr.).Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. and Pearson, R. A. 1985. Factors affecting the measurements of draught force, work output and power of oxen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105: 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. and Pearson, R. A. 1989. Measurement of energy expenditure in working animals: methods for different conditions. In Draught animals in rural development (ed. Hoffman, D., Nari, J. and Petheram, R. J.), ACIAR proceedings series no. 27, pp. 155–165. ACIAR, Canberra.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R., Sosa, R. and Campbell, I. 1989. The underlying ‘resting’ energy consumption of oxen during work. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 48: 154A (abstr.).Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D., Eayres, H., Emmans, G. C, Hou, X. Z., Illius, A. W., Jessop, N. S. and Matthewman, R. W. 1989. Food and animal characteristics relevant to the prediction of forage consumption and nutrient use of productive ruminants. In Feeding strategies for improving productivity of ruminant livestock in developing countries, pp. 97–112. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
O'Neill, D. H. 1989a. Instrumentation for the measurement of draught animal performance. ILCA Bulletin 33: 04, 2–8.Google Scholar
O'Neill, D. H. 1989b. Research to improve the effectiveness of draught ox powered cultivation (project R3906). (Restricted distribution). AFRC Institute of Engineering Research, Overseas Division report.Google Scholar
O'Neill, D. H. and Kemp, D. C. 1989. A comparison of work outputs of draught oxen. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 43: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, R. A. 1989. A comparison of draught cattle (Bos indicus) and buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) carting loads in hot conditions. Animal Production 49: 355–363.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. A., Lawrence, P. R. and Ghimire, C. 1989. Factors influencing the work done by draught oxen: a study in the eastern hills of Nepal. Animal Production 49: 345–353.Google Scholar
Rautaray, S. K. 1985. Output of a pair of bullocks during tillage operations in summer. Proceedings of the International Society of Agricultural Engineers Silver Jubilee Convention, Vol. 1, pp. 22–33.Google Scholar
Richards, J. I. and Lawrence, P. R. 1984. The estimation of energy expenditure from heart rate measurements in working oxen and buffalo. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102: 711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, B. G. and Ramirez, A. A. 1986. Draught oxen energy expenditure. A Mexican case study. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, paper no. 86–5506. Chicago.Google Scholar
Singh, G., Premi, S. C. L. and Salokhe, V. M. 1989. Performance of bullocks under different load and climatic conditions. Agricultural Mechanisation in Asia, Africa and Latin America 20:(4), 23–30.Google Scholar
Stotz, D. 1979. Smallholder dairy development in past, present and future in Kenya. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hohenheim.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. R., Maloiy, G. O., Weibel, E. R., Langman, V. A., Kamau, J. M. Z., Seeherman, H. J. and Heglund, N. C. 1980. Design of mammalian respiratory system. III. Scaling maximum aerobic capacity to body mass: wild and domestic mammals. Respiration Physiology 44: 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teleni, E. and Hogan, J. P. 1989. Improving the nutrition level of draught animals using available feeds. In Draught animals and rural development (ed. Hoffmann, D., Nari, J. and Petheram, R. J.), ACIAR proceedings no. 27, Canberra.Google Scholar
Thakur, T. C, Bachchan, S. and Singh, M. P. 1989. Effects of load on physiological responses of buffaloes in rotary mode. Agricultural Mechanisation in Asia, Africa and Latin America 20(4), 15–22.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, R. C. 1987. Factors limiting work capacity and fatigue assessment in draught animals. Utilisation and economics of draught animal power (ed. Srivastava, N. S. L. and Ojha, T. P.), proceedings of the national seminar on status of animal energy utilisation, Bhopal, India, pp. 1–16. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, R. C. and Madan, M. L. 1985. Studies on blood acid-base status and muscle metabolism in working bullocks. Animal Production 40:11–16.Google Scholar