Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:25:38.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship of lifetime productivity with mature weight and maturation rate in Red Poll cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. E. Marshall ,
M. A. Mohler  and
T. S. Stewart
T. E. Marshall
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
M. A. Mohler
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
T. S. Stewart
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
Get access

Abstract

Lifetime maternal records were collected from 116 Red Poll cows born over a 12-year period. Estimates of mature cow weight (A), maturation rate (K) and lifetime maternal performance characters (years in herd, YH; number of calves weaned, NC; total calf weight weaned, TW; total calf weight plus mature cow weight produced, TW + A; average calf weaning weight, AW; calf weight weaned per year in the herd, TWIYH and predicted cow metabolizable energy (ME) required per kg beef produced, MEITW + A) were calculated to study the relationship between cow growth characters and maternal performance. Calf weights were adjusted to a steer basis. Reproductive management practices consisted of breeding heifers to calve as 2-year-olds; cows failing to calve in two successive seasons were culled. Mean mature cow weight was 554 (s.e. 6) kg with a mean maturation rate of 0·059 (s.e. 0·001) per month. The correlation between A and K was −0·69. Means for lifetime maternal characters were: YH, 5·1 (s.e. 0·2); NC, 4·7 (s.e. 0·2); TW, 1187 (s.e. 54) kg; TW + A, 1741 (s.e. 55) kg; AW, 252 (s.e. 1·7) kg; TWIYH, 228 (s.e. 4·5) kg/year; and MEITW + A, 72 (s.e. 1·2) MJ ME per kg beef. The regression of maternal lifetime productivity measures on mature cow weight was quadratic for YH, NC, TW and TW + A with optimal cow weight being 606, 600, 605 and 628 kg, respectively. AW and MEITW + A were positive linear functions of cow mature weight. Regressions of YH, NC, TW, TWIYH and TW + A on K were negative linear functions. AW and MEITW + A were not significantly related to K.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 383 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and Growth. Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Brown, J. E. and Brown, C. J. 1972. The influence of mature weight and rate of maturing on individual beef cow efficiency. Bull. Univ. Arkansas, No. 774.Google Scholar
Brown, J. E., Fitzhugh, H. A. Jr and Cartwright, T. C. 1976. A comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight-age relationships in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 810–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J. A. Jr, Fitzhugh, H. A. Jr, Brown, J. E. and Crouch, E. K. 1971. Relationships among growth curve parameters and measures of productivity in beef cows. Beef cattle Res. Tex. pp. 41–43.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, H. A. Jr, Miouel, M. C. and Thomas, R. C. 1973. Canonical analysis of beef cow weight and productivity. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 233 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. R., Parker, C. F., Klosterman, E. W. and Harvey, W. R. 1965. Body weight as a measure of productivity of Hereford cows. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 848 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Joandet, G. E. and Cartwright, T. C. 1969. Estimation of efficiency of beef production. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 862–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J. H. 1957. The interrelations of type, performance, and carcass characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 16: 240–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, C. R., Cartwright, T. C. and Fitzhugh, H. A. Jr, 1975. Systems analysis of sources of genetic and environmental variation in efficiency of beef production: cow size and herd management. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1970. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 4, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 4th ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. A. and Cartwright, T. C. 1967. Growth of calf as related to weight of dam. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 1464 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Stewart, T. S. and Martin, T. G. 1983. Optimal mature size of Angus cows for maximum cow productivity. Anim. Prod. 37: 179–182.Google Scholar