Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:33:44.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between live weight of ewe at mating and weight of newborn lamb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

H. P. Donald  and
W. S. Russell
H. P. Donald
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
W. S. Russell
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Summary

Regression of litter weight of newborn lambs on the live weight of ewes at mating has been estimated from data on 15 breeds after conversion of group means of ewes and lambs to natural logarithms. Regression coefficients were estimated to be 0·721 for single lambs, 0·741 for twins and 0·773 for triplets. These values are not signi-ficantly different from each other. Data from ewes with single lambs and from ewes with twins are consistent with the hypothesis that litter weight at birth as a proportion of ewe weight at mating tends to dechne as ewe weight rises from small to large breeds. In a breed with ewes averaging 25 kg the expected birth weight of singles is 9·6% and of twins 15·2%, of ewe weight. For a breed with ewes of 100 kg the corresponding weights would be 6·5% and 10·6% of ewe weight. Since the estimated regression coefficient and the coefficient in the expression for metabolic weight (0·730) are alike, the regression equations can be interpreted as showing that single lambs were 22·6% and twin pairs 36·1% of ewes' metabolic weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 1970 , pp. 273 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amble, V. N., Khandekar, N. C. and Garg, J. N. 1964. Statistical studies on breeding data of Beetal goats. Indian Council agric. Res., Res. Ser., No. 38, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Bhasin, N. R. and Desai, R. N. 1967. Studies on factors affecting birth weight in Bikaneri sheep—effect of dam and month of lambing. Indian J. vet. Sci. 37: 339–346.Google Scholar
Bonsma, F. N. 1939. Factors influencing the growth and development of lambs with special reference to crossbreeding of Merino sheep for fat-lamb production in South Africa. Publ. Univ. Pretoria Ser. 1, No. 48, 214 pp.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. C. 1962. Characters of economic importance in Welsh Mountain sheep. Anim. Prod. 4: 269–278.Google Scholar
Dickinson, A. G., Hancock, J. L., Hovell, G. J. R., Taylor, St C. S. and Wiener, G. 1962. The size of lambs at birth—a study involving egg transfer. Anim. Prod. 4: 64–79.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P., Russell, W. S. and Taylor, St C. S. 1962. Birth weights of reciprocally crossbred calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58: 405–412.Google Scholar
Epstein, H. and Herz, A. 1964. Fertility and birth weights of goats in a subtropical environment. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62: 237–244.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. L. 1957. The maternal influence on size in sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48: 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. and Hansson, A. 1943. The sex ratio and multiple births in sheep. Ann. Agric. Coll. Sweden, 2: 145–171.Google Scholar
Leitch, I., Hytten, F. E. and Billewicz, W. Z. 1959. The maternal and neonatal weights of some mammalia. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 133: 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, H. 1964. [Causes of birth weight variation in calves.] Ziichtungskunde 36: 303–316.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W. and Dawson, W. M. 1937. The relation of type and time of birth and birth weight of lambs to their survival, growth and suitability for breeding. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 296–306.Google Scholar
Starke, J. S., Smith, J. B. and Joubert, D. M. 1958. The birth weight of lambs. Bull. S. Afr. Dept. Agr. Sci., No. 328, 21 pp.Google Scholar
Yalçin, B. C. and Bichard, M. 1964. Crossbred sheep production. I. Factors affecting production from the crossbred ewe flock. Anim. Prod. 6: 73–84.Google Scholar