Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:30:32.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between dam and calf characteristics with regard to dystocia in Belgian Blue double-muscled cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

L. O. Fiems ,
S. de Campeneere ,
W. van Caelenbergh  and
Ch. V. Boucqué
L. O. Fiems
Affiliation:
CLO-Gent, Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Cattle Husbandry Section, Scheldeweg 68, B9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
S. de Campeneere
Affiliation:
CLO-Gent, Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Cattle Husbandry Section, Scheldeweg 68, B9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
W. van Caelenbergh
Affiliation:
CLO-Gent, Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Cattle Husbandry Section, Scheldeweg 68, B9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
Ch. V. Boucqué
Affiliation:
CLO-Gent, Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Cattle Husbandry Section, Scheldeweg 68, B9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Information concerning 493 single calvings of the double-muscled beef cow herd of the institute was collected to investigate the relationship between the characteristics of dams and calves with regard to dystocia. Factors affecting dystocia are similar in double-muscled cattle to those in non-double-muscled cattle but the occurrence of dystocia is greatly increased in double-muscled cows. Incidence of caesarean section was significantly correlated with parity (–0·243), age of dam (–0·232), post-partum dam weight (–0·185), and calf birth weight (0·164). Caesarean deliveries were required for 89·5% of the parturitions. Calvings without caesarean section were characterized by higher means for post-partum dam live weight (634·7 kg), age (1675·5 days), parity (3·1) and the ratio of post-partum dam weight to calf birth weight (14·4), compared with 580·2 kg, 1251·1 days, 2·1, and 11·8, respectively for births with caesarean setion, while calf birth weight was lower in non-caesarean calvings (45·8 v. 49·9 kg). Caesarean births involved more male calves than females (55 v. 45%). Even when calf birth weight was 30 kg or lower, and also in multiparous cows, 40 and 86% of the deliveries, respectively, still occurred with a caesarean section.

Incidence of caesarean section could not be accurately predicted from pre-partum characteristics such as pre-partum dam weight, age and parity.

Keywords

birth weightcaesarean sectiondouble-musclingdystocia.
Type
Reproduction
Information
Animal Science , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 389 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basarab, J. A., Rutter, L. M. and Day, P. A. 1993. The efficacy of predicting dystocia in yearling beef heifers. I. Using ratios of pelvic area to birth weight or pelvic area to heifer weight. Journal of Animal Science 71: 1359–1371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellows, R. A., Gengo, P. C., Moore, S. A. and Chase, C. C. Jr 1996. Factors affecting dystocia in Brahman-cross heifers in subtropical southern United States. Journal of Animal Science 74: 1451–1456.Google Scholar
Bellows, R. A. and Lammoglia, M. A. 2000. Effects of severity of dystocia on cold tolerance and serum concentrations of glucose and cortisol in neonatal beef calves. Theriogenology 53: 803–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellows, R. A. and Short, R. E. 1994. Reproductive losses in the beef industry. In Factors affecting calf crop (ed. Fields, M. J. and Sand, R. S.), pp. 109–133. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Bellows, R. A., Short, R. E., Anderson, D. C., Knapp, B. W. and Pahnish, O. F. 1971. Cause and effect relationship associated with calving difficulty and calf birth weight. Journal of Animal Science 33: 407–415.Google Scholar
Bellows, R. A., Short, R. E., Staigmiller, R. B. and Milmine, W. L. 1988. Effects of induced parturition and early obstetrical assistance in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 66: 1073–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, P. J., Cubas, A. C., Healey, M. H. and Koehler, K. J. 1992. Factors affecting dystocia and early calf mortality in Angus cows and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 70: 1775–1786.Google Scholar
Butaye, R. 1967. Naissances et poids à la naissance chez le bétail de la Flandre Orientale. Revue de l’Agriculture 20: 1543–1559.Google Scholar
Clauwers, M., Willems, W. and Vandenberghe, K. 1999. Rundvleesproductie. Resultaten projectbedrijven Vlaanderen. Ministry of Small Enterprises and Agriculture, Brussels.Google Scholar
Flecknell, P. A. and Molony, V. 1997. Pain and injury. In Animal welfare (ed. Appleby, M. C. and Hughes, B. O.), pp. 63–73. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Hanset, R. and Jandrain, M. 1977. Selection for double-muscling and calving problems. In Calving problems and early viability of the calf (ed. Hoffmann, B., Mason, I. L. and Schmidt, J.), pp. 91–104. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
Koch, R. M., Cundiff, L. V. and Gregory, K. E. 1994. Heterosis and breed effects on reproduction. In Factors affecting calf crop (ed. Fields, M. J. and Sand, R. S.), pp. 223–242. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Laster, D. B., Glimp, H. A., Cundiff, L. V. and Gregory, K. E. 1973. Factors affecting dystocia and the effects of dystocia on subsequent reproduction in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 36: 695–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijering, A. 1984. Dystocia and stillbirth in cattle – a review of causes, relations and implications. Livestock Production Science 11: 143–177.Google Scholar
F., Ménissier 1982. General survey of the effect of double muscling on cattle performance. In Muscle hypertrophy of genetic origin and its use to improve beef production (ed. King, J. W. B. and Ménissier, F.), pp. 23–53. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
Ménissier, F., Foulley, J. L. and Pattie, W. A. 1981. The calving ability of the Charolais breed in France, and its possibilities for genetic improvement. 1. The importance of causes of calving difficulties. Irish Veterinary Journal 35: 73–81.Google Scholar
Michaux, C. and Hanset, R. 1986. Mode de vêlage et reproduction chez les génisses de race Blanc Bleu belge des types viandeux et mixte. Annales de Médecine Vétérinaires 130: 439–451.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. J., Bellows, R. A. and Burfening, P. J. 1981. Effects of caesarean section, retained placenta and vaginal or uterine prolapse on subsequent fertility in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 53: 916–921.Google Scholar
Philipsson, J. 1976. Studies on calving difficulty, stillbirth and associated factors in Swedish cattle breeds. V. Effects of calving performance and stillbirth in Swedish Friesian heifers on productivity in the subsequent lactation. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 26: 230–234.Google Scholar
Reynolds, W. L., Urick, J. J. and Knapp, B. W. 1990. Biological type effects on gestation length, calving traits and calf growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 68: 630–639.Google Scholar
Rutter, L. M., Ray, D. E. and Roubicek, C. B. 1983. Factors affecting and prediction of dystocia in Charolais heifers. Journal of Animal Science 57: 1077–1083.Google Scholar
Smith, G. M., Laster, D. B. and Gregory, K. E. 1976. Characterization of biological types of cattle I. Dystocia and preweaning growth. Journal of Animal Science 43: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 1998. SPSS base 8·0 for Windows, user’s guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Vermorel, M., Vernet, J., Dardillat, C., Saido Demigne, C. and Davicco, M. J. 1989. Energy metabolism and thermoregulation in the newborn calf. Effect of calving conditions. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 69: 113–122.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A. and Russel, A. J. F. 1984. Partition of fat, body condition and body condition score in mature cows. Animal Production 38: 23–32.Google Scholar