Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:02:27.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rearing of dairy cattle 8. Relationships of dietary energy intake, changes in live weight, body condition and fertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. Baishya ,
S. V. Morant ,
G. S. Pope  and
J. D. Leaver
N. Baishya
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
S. V. Morant
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
G. S. Pope
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
J. D. Leaver
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Get access

Abstract

In each of 2 years, two groups of 25 British Friesian heifers were given, respectively, a moderate- and a low-energy diet for a 12-week period. Mean live-weight gains of 0·25 kg/day and 0·45 kg/day were recorded for the moderate-energy diet, and losses of 0·22 kg/day and 013 kg/day for the low-energy diet. Heifers were inseminated artificially at oestrus at approximately the mid-point of the 12-week period, this oestrus being the next observed after synchronized oestrus, which followed luteolysis induced by cloprostenol injections. With few exceptions, heifers that gained weight were in good or medium condition at insemination and those that lost weight were in medium or poor condition.

Highest pregnancy rate (0·78) was recorded for heifers that gained weight and were in medium condition at insemination. For heifers losing weight, pregnancy rate dropped to 0·46 (P < 0·05) due to reproductive failure occurring before the 25th day after insemination. Only in heifers in poor body condition was there a significantly higher proportion failing to ovulate normally (P < 0·001). Among heifers gaining weight, those failing to become pregnant to the first insemination were approximately lOOg/kg heavier than the pregnant ones (P<0·05).

Irrespective of gain or loss of weight, and of body condition at insemination, embryo losses did not occur later than the 25th day after insemination, except that five heifers that showed oestrus when pregnant (according to plasma progesterone levels) and were reinseminated then showed evidence of embryo loss.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 63 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baishya, N., Ball, P. J. H., Leaver, J. D. and Pope, G. S. 1980. Fertility of lactating dairy cows inseminated after treatment with cloprostenol. Br. vet. J. 136: 227–239.Google Scholar
Ball, P. J. H. 1978. The relationship of age and stage of gestation to the incidence of embryo death in dairy cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 25: 120–122.Google Scholar
Bearden, H. J., Hansel, W. and Bratton, R. W. 1956. Fertilization and embryonic mortality rates of bulls with histories of either low or high fertility in artificial breeding. J. Dairy Sci. 39: 312–318.Google Scholar
Bishop, M. W. H. 1964. Paternal contribution to embryonic death. J. Reprod. Fert. 7: 383–396.Google Scholar
Bond, J., Wiltbank, J. N. and Cook, A. C. 1958. Cessation of estrus and ovarian activity in a group of beef heifers on extremely low levels of energy and protein. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 1211 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Boyd, H., Bacsich, P., Young, A. and McCracken, J. A. 1969. Fertilization and embryonic survival in dairy cattle. Br. vet. J. 125: 87–97.Google Scholar
Erb, R. E. and Holtz, E. W. 1958. Factors associated with estimated fertilization and service efficiency of cows. J. Dairy Sci. 41: 1541–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furr, B. J. A., Cooper, M. J., Jackson, P. S., Hart, I. C. and Pope, G. S. 1981. Effects of cloprostenol and prostaglandin F2a on secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, growth hormone, thyroxine and cortisol in heifers. Ada. vet. scand., Suppl. 77, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
Glencross, R. G. and Pope, G. S. 1981. Concentrations of oestradiol-17β and progesterone in the plasma of dairy heifers before and after cloprostenol-induced and natural luteolysis and during early pregnancy. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 4: 93–106.Google Scholar
Hawk, H. W., Wiltbank, J. N., Kidder, H. E. and Casida, L. E. 1955. Embryonic mortality between 16 and 34 days post-breeding in cows of low fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 38: 673–676.Google Scholar
Kidder, H. E., Black, W. G., Wiltbank, J. N., Ulberg, L. C. and Casida, L. E. 1954. Fertilization rates and embryonic death rates in cows bred to bulls of different levels of fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 37: 691–697.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. 1949. Infertility in cattle associated with death of ova at early stages after fertilisation. J. comp. Path. Ther. 59: 97–108.Google Scholar
Lamond, D. R. 1970. The influence of undernutrition on reproduction in the cow. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 38: 359–372.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. 1977. Rearing of dairy cattle. 7. Effect of level of nutrition and body condition on the fertility of heifers. Anim. Prod. 25: 219–224.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Glencross, R. G. and Pope, G. S. 1975. Fertility of Friesian heifers after luteolysis with a prostaglandin analogue (ICI 80996). Vet. Rec. 96: 383–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staples, R. E. and Hansel, W. 1961. Luteal function and embryo survival in the bovine. J. Dairy Sci. 44: 2040–2048.Google Scholar