Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:35:19.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production responses of weaned pigs after chronic exposure to airborne dust and ammonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C. M. Wathes ,
T. G. M. Demmers ,
N. Teer ,
R. P. White ,
L. L. Taylor ,
V. Bland ,
P. Jones ,
D. Armstrong ,
A. C. J. Gresham  and
J. Hartung
...Show all authors
C. M. Wathes*
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS UK
T. G. M. Demmers
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS UK
N. Teer
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS UK
R. P. White
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS UK
L. L. Taylor
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, Hitchin Road, Stotfold, Hitchin, UK
V. Bland
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, Hitchin Road, Stotfold, Hitchin, UK
P. Jones
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, Hitchin Road, Stotfold, Hitchin, UK
D. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, Winterhill House, Snowdon Drive, Milton Keynes, UK
A. C. J. Gresham
Affiliation:
Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Veterinary Investigation Centre, Rougham Hill, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK
J. Hartung
Affiliation:
Tierärtzliche Hochschule Hannover, Institut fûr Tierhygiene, Tierschutz und Nutztierethologie, Bunteweg 17p, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
D. J. Chennells
Affiliation:
Acorn House Veterinary Surgery, Linnet Way, Brickhill, Bedford, UK.
S. H. Done
Affiliation:
Veterinary Laboratories Agency, West House, Station Road, Thirsk, Yorkshire, UK
*
Corresponding author. E-mail:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Nine hundred and sixty weaned pigs were exposed for 5·5 weeks to controlled concentrations of airborne dust and ammonia in a single, multi-factorial experiment. Production and health responses were measured but only the former are reported here. The treatments were a dust concentration of either 1·2, 2·7, 5·1 or 9·9 mg/m3 (inhalable fraction) and an ammonia concentration of either 0·6, 10·0, 18·8 or 37·0 p. p. m., which are representative of commercial conditions. The experiment was carried out over 2·5 years and pigs were used in eight batches, each comprising five lots of 24 pigs. Each treatment combination was replicated once and an additional control lot (nominally ≈ 0 mg/m3 dust and ≈ 0 p. p. m. ammonia) was included in each batch to provide a baseline. The dust concentration was common across the other four lots in each batch in which all four ammonia concentrations were used; thus the split-plot design was more sensitive to the effects of ammonia than dust.

The pigs were kept separately in five rooms in a purpose-built facility. The pollutants were injected continuously into the air supply. Ammonia was supplied from a pressurized cylinder and its concentration was measured with an NOx chemiluminescent gas analyser after catalytic conversion. The endogenous dust in each room was supplemented by an artificial dust, which was manufactured from food, barley straw and faeces, mixed by weight in the proportions 0·5: 0·1: 0·4. The ingredients were oven-dried, milled and mixed and this artificial dust was then resuspended in the supply air. Dust concentration was monitored continuously with a tribo-electric sensor and measured continually with an aerodynamic particle sizer and gravimetric samplers.

Live weight per pig and cumulative food intake per pen of 12 pigs were measured after 5·5 weeks of exposure. Exposure to both aerial pollutants depressed live weight relative to the control (control v. pollutant, 25·7 v. 25·0 (s.e.d. = 0·33) kg, P = 0·043) and there was a trend for food intake to be lower for pollutant-exposed pigs (control v. pollutant 292 v. 280 (s.e.d. = 7·1) kg per pen, P = 0·124). The reduction in live weight and food intake was dependent upon the concentration of dust (mean across all ammonia concentrations for increasing dust concentration; live weight 25·3, 26·4, 24·0 and 24·5 (s.e.d. = 0·65) kg, P = 0·081; food intake 295, 316, 248 and 263 (s.e.d. = 14·3) kg per pen, P = 0·016) but not ammonia (mean across all dust concentrations for increasing ammonia concentration; live weight 24·4, 25·1, 25·3 and 25·3 (s.e.d. = 0·41) kg, P = 0·158; food intake 279, 275, 288 and 279 kg (s.e.d. = 9·0) kg per pen, P = 0·520). There was an interaction between dust and ammonia for live weight (P = 0·030) but the effects were complicated and may have been the result of a type I error. There was no interaction for food intake (P = 0·210). In general, both food intake and live-weight gain, but not food conversion efficiency, were lower for weaned pigs exposed to 5·1 and 9·9 mg/m3 dust concentrations compared with 1·2 and 2·7 mg/m3 treatments. Other measures of production were also analysed and supported the overall interpretation that dust concentrations of 5·1 mg/m3 and higher depress performance.

This study is the first to quantify the effects of chronic exposure to common aerial pollutants on the performance of weaned pigs. The results suggest that dust concentrations of 5·1 or 9·9 mg/m3 (inhalable fraction) across ammonia concentrations up to 37 p.p.m. adversely affect performance. The commercial significance of these findings depends on the financial benefits of the superior production at low dust concentrations relative to the cost of providing air of this quality.

Keywords

ammoniadiseasedustpigsproduction
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 87 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Demmers, T. G. M., Wathes, C. M., Richards, P. A., Teer, N., Taylor, L. L., Bland, V., Goodman, J., Armstrong, D., Chennells, D. and Done, S. H. 2003. A facility for controlled exposure of pigs to airborne dusts and gases. Biosystems Engineering 84: 217–230.Google Scholar
Doig, P. A. and Willoughby, R. A. 1971. Response of swine to atmospheric ammonia and dust. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 159: 1353–1361.Google Scholar
Done, S. H., Gresham, A. C. J., Chennells, D. J., Williamson, S., Hunt, B., Taylor, L. L., Bland, V., Jones, P., Armstrong, D., White, R. P., Demmers, T. G. M., Teer, N. and Wathes, C. M. 2004. The clinical and pathological responses of weaned pigs to atmospheric ammonia and dust. Veterinary Record In press.Google Scholar
Donham, K., Reynolds, S., Whitten, P., Merchant, J., Burmeister, L. and Popendorf, W. 1995. Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 27: 405–418.Google Scholar
Drummond, J. G., Curtis, S.E., Simon, J. and Norton, H. W. 1980. Effects of aerial ammonia on growth and health of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 50: 1085–1091.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. C. D., Roe, J. M., Hayes, C. M., Jones, P., Pearson, G. R. and Webster, A. J. F. 1999. Contributory and exacerbating roles of gaseous ammonia and organic dust in the etiology of atrophic rhinitis. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 6: 199–203.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. C. D., Roe, J. M., Hayes, C. M. and Webster, A. J. F. 1998a. Effects of ammonia inhalation and acetic acid pretreatment on the colonisation kinetics of toxigenic Pasteurella multocida within the upper respiratory tract of swine. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 36: 1260–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, T. C. D., Roe, J. M., Hayes, C. M. and Webster, A. J. F. 1998b. Effect of ovalbumin aerosol exposure on colonisation of the porcine upper airway by Pasteurella multocida and effect of colonisation on subsequent immune function. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 5: 494–498.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. C. D., Roe, J. M. and Webster, A. J. F. 1996. The synergistic role of gaseous ammonia in the aetiology of P. multocida-induced atrophic rhinitis in swine. American Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34: 2185–2190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, J. B., Burgess, L. R., Webster, A. J. F. and Wathes, C. M. 1996. Behavi 5 M Enterprise, Sheffield.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S., Donham, K., Whitten, P., Merchant, J., Murmeister, L. and Popendorf, W. 1996. Longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29: 33–40.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. F., Wilson, D. and Smith, W. J. 1990. Atrophic rhinitis: the influence of the aerial environment. Animal Production 50: 173–182.Google Scholar
Turner, L. W., Wathes, C. M. and Audsley, E. 1993. Dynamic probabilistic modelling of atrophic rhinitis in swine. International winter meeting, Chicago, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, USA, paper no. 93–4559.Google Scholar
Wathes, C. M. 1998. Environmental control in pig housing. Proceedings of the 15th international Pig Veterinary Society congress, Birmingham, UK, vol. I (ed. Done, S., Thomson, J. and Varley, M.), pp. 257–265. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. 1996. Lack of research threatens UK pig herd. Veterinary Record 139: 223.Google Scholar