Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:11:31.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production, fertility and hatchability of ostrich (Struthio camelus) eggs on a farm in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. C. Deeming
D. C. Deeming
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT
Get access

Abstract

The farming of ostriches is well established in South Africa and is gaining in popularity in agriculture around the world but few scientific data are available for rates of egg production and the factors affecting incubation and hatching. Production and hatchability of over 1200 ostrich eggs on a farm in the United Kingdom were recorded during the 1995 season. Females of breeding ages (no. = 43) were kept in 13 enclosures in sex ratios of 1: 1 or 1: 2 (M: F). Productivity of all ostriches over the laying season was 25·2% although when results from individual enclosures, and from individual birds, were examined higher rates of production were achieved although only one bird achieved her full laying potential. As group size increased productivity decreased. Overall fertility was 78·7% although fertility greater than 90% was achieved by females kept in pairs or trios. Larger group sizes had lower fertility. Mean weekly hatchability was only 24·1% with hatch of fertile eggs being 31·9%. Maximum hatchability of eggs produced from an individual female was 73% of fertile eggs. Microbial contamination of eggs was 32·6% and this was the biggest cause of failure to hatch, although rates of contamination varied between females. These results for productivity are similar to those published for ostriches in Israel and South Africa. Hatchability is lower, and microbial contamination is higher than published information although this is the most comprehensive study of ostrich production yet published. Future development of ostrich breeding programmes needs to concentrate on small breeding groups, preferably pairs, and on improvements in nest site hygiene and post-laying egg management.

Keywords

egg hatchabilityfertilityostrichesproductivity
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , October 1996 , pp. 329 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertram, B. C. R. 1993. The ostrich communal nesting system. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Bubier, N. E., Paxton, C. M., Bowers, P. and Deeming, D. C. 1996. Courtship behaviour of domestic ostriches (Struthio camelus) towards humans. British Poultry Science In press.Google Scholar
Deeming, D. C. 1995a. Factors affecting hatchability during commercial incubation of ostrich (Struthio camelus) eggs. British Poultry Science 36: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deeming, D. C. 1995b. The hatching sequence of ostrich (Struthio camelus) embryos with notes on development as observed by candling. British Poultry Science 36: 67–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deeming, D. C. 1996. Microbial spoilage of ostrich (Struthio camelus) eggs. British Poultry Science 37: 689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeming, D. C. and Ayres, L. L. 1994. Factors affecting the rate of growth of ostrich (Struthio camelus) chicks in captivity. Veterinary Record 135: 617–622.Google ScholarPubMed
Deeming, D. C., Ayres, L. L. and Ayres, F. J. 1993. Observations on the commercial production of ostrich (Struthio camelus) in the United Kingdom: incubation. Veterinary Record 132: 602–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degen, A. A., Weil, S., Rosenstrauch, A., Kam, M. and Dawson, A. 1994. Seasonal plasma levels of luteinizing and steroid hormones in male and female domestic ostriches (Struthio camelus). General and Comparative Endocrinology 93: 21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etches, R. J. 1996. Reproduction in poultry. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Hodgetts, B. 1991. Current hatchabilities in species of domestic importance and the scope for improvement. In Avian incubation (ed. Tullett, S. G.), pp. 139–144. Butterworths-Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Hurxthal, L. M. 1979. Breeding behaviour of the ostrich (Struthio camelus) in Nairobi Park. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
Jarvis, M. J. F., Jarvis, C. and Keffen, R. H. 1985. Breeding seasons and laying patterns of the Southern African ostrich Struthio camelus. Ibis 127:442–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeegan, D. E. F. and Deeming, D. C. 1996. Effects of gender and group size on the time-activity budgets of adult breeding ostriches (Struthio camelus) in a farming environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science In press.Google Scholar
Mellett, F. D. 1993. Ostrich production and products. In Livestock production systems, principles and practise (ed. Maree, C. and Casey, N. H.), pp. 187–194. Agri Development Foundation, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Middleton, A. L. A. 1991. Feather care and moult. In The Cambridge encyclopaedia of ornithology (ed. Brooke, M. and Birkhead, T.), pp. 137–145. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sauer, E. G. F. and Sauer, E. M. 1966. The behaviour and ecology of the South African ostrich. Living Bird 5: 45–75.Google Scholar
Smith, W. A., Cilliers, S. C., Mellett, F. D. and Schalkwyk, S. J. van 1995. Ostrich production — a South African perspective. In Biotechnology in the feed industry (ed. Lyons, T. P. and Jacques, K. A.), proceedings of Alltech's eleventh annual symposium, pp. 175–197. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar