Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:41:47.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A preliminary study of the effects of the anthelmintic thiophanate (‘Nemafax’) on the breeding performance of sows naturally infested with Oesophagostomum spp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. M. Baines  and
P. Lake
D. M. Baines
Affiliation:
May and Baker Ltd, Fyfield Road, Ongar, Essex
P. Lake
Affiliation:
May and Baker Ltd, Fyfield Road, Ongar, Essex
Get access

Abstract

Three trials were conducted on commercial premises using sows naturally infested with gastro-intestinal nematodes, primarily Oesophagostomum spp. In two trials the farrowing performance of sows treated approximately 7 days before farrowing with thiophanate (‘Nemafax’) in-feed at a median dosage of 62·5 mg/kg was compared with that of untreated controls. In the third trial a similar comparison was made between sows treated approximately 7 days before expected service and untreated controls. In all cases faecal egg counts indicated thiophanate was highly effective against the nematode burdens present. Administered pre-farrowing, thiophanate resulted in better pre-weaning weight gains and relatively lower creep feed consumptions of the piglets. This effect was most marked in the trial with a higher level of Oesophagostomum spp. infestation in the sows. Under similar circumstances, pre-service medication produced a response in terms of live piglets born and those surviving to weaning.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 217 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baines, D. M., Dalton, S. E. and Eichler, D. A. 1976. Experimental and field studies with thiophanate in pigs. Vet. Rec. 99: 119–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baines, D. M., Evans, P., Frape, D. L. and Lake, P. 1979. Field studies with thiophanate given as a 14-day low level in-feed anthelmintic to pigs. Vet. Rec. 105: 81–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, I. B. and Taffs, L. F. 1965. Gastro-intestinal parasites in pigs. Vet Rec. 77: 403.Google Scholar
Ferber, M. T. and Thomas, R. J. 1980. The effect of Oesophagostomum quadrispinulatum infection on reproductive performance in the sow. Proc. int. Pig Vet. Soc. Congr., Copenhagen, p. 204.Google Scholar
Gitter, M., Gibson, T. E., Kidd, A. R. M. and Davies, G. 1966. Gastro-intestinal parasites in sows. Vet. Rec. 79: 447–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, D. E. and Dunn, A. M. 1969. Helminths of Scottish pigs: occurrence, age incidence and seasonal variation. J. Helminth. 43: 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1971. Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques. Tech. Bull. 18. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Pattison, H. D., Smith, W. C. and Thomas, R. J. 1979. The effect of sub-clinical nematode parasitism on reproductive performance in the sow. Anim. Prod. 29: 321–326.Google Scholar
Pattison, H. D., Thomas, R. J. and Smith, W. C. 1980a. A survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in pigs. Vet. Rec. 107: 415–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pattison, H. D., Thomas, R. J. and Smith, W. C. 1980b. The effect of sub clinical nematode parasitism on digestion and performance in growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 30: 285–294.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. J. and Smith, W. C. 1968. Anthelmintic treatment of sows with thiabendazole. Vet. Rec. 83: 489–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed