Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:52:05.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population structure, inbreeding trend and their association with hip and elbow dysplasia in dogs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

K. Mäki ,
A. F. Groen ,
A.-E. Liinamo  and
M. Ojala
K. Mäki*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, PO Box 28, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland
A. F. Groen
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
A.-E. Liinamo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, PO Box 28, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland
M. Ojala
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, PO Box 28, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland
*
†E-mail:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aims of this study were to examine population structure and inbreeding trend in six dog breeds in Finland and to assess the inbreeding depression for hip and elbow dysplasia. Data consisted of 289 569 dogs, of which 36 924 dogs also had a record for hip and/or elbow dysplasia screening. From the early 1980s onwards, inbreeding trends were decreasing in the Golden Retriever, the Labrador Retriever, the Rough Collie and the Rottweiler, probably as a result of importations of dogs, and somewhat increasing in the Finnish Hound and the German Shepherd. When analysed per generation, observed mean inbreeding coefficients were higher than the expected ones in each breed, indicating that breeders have not actively avoided inbreeding. As a class effect, the inbreeding level was significant only for hip dysplasia in the Labrador Retriever and the German Shepherd breeds. As a regression, inbreeding level of a dog had only a minor effect on both of the dysplasias. Hip dysplasia in the Labrador Retriever appeared to be more influenced by longer term aggregation of homozygosity (long-term inbreeding) in animals than by shorter-term inbreeding. When analysed from two data sets with a minimum of five and two ancestral generations for each dog in the data, a statistically significant association between hip dysplasia and inbreeding for the Labrador Retriever could be detected only in the former data set.

Keywords

dogselbow dysplasiahip dysplasiainbreeding depressionpopulation structure
Type
Breeding and genetics
Information
Animal Science , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , October 2001 , pp. 217 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burrow, H. M. 1993. The effects of inbreeding in beef cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 61: 737–751.Google Scholar
Caballero, A. 1994. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73: 657–679.Google Scholar
Caballero, A., Santiago, E. and Toro, M. A. 1996. Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations. Animal Science 62: 431–442.Google Scholar
Distl, O., Grussler, W., Schwarz, J. and Kräusslich, H. 1991. [Analysis of environmental and genetic influences on the frequency of hip dysplasia in German Shepherd dogs.] Journal of Veterinary Medicine 38: 460–471.Google Scholar
Ehiobu, N. G., Goddard, M. E. and Taylor, J. F. 1989. Effect of rate of inbreeding on inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster . Theoretical and Applied Genetics 77: 123–127.Google Scholar
Ercanbrack, S. K. and Knight, A. D. 1991. Effects of inbreeding on reproduction and wool production of Rambouillet, Targhee and Columbia ewes. Journal of Animal Science 69: 4734–4744.Google Scholar
Ercanbrack, S. K. and Knight, A. D. 1993. Ten-year linear trends in reproduction and wool production among inbred and non inbred lines of Rambouillet, Targhee and Columbia sheep. Journal of Animal Science 71: 341–354.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, fourth edition. Longman, Harlow, Essex.Google Scholar
Fikse, W. F., Groen, A. F. and Berger, P. J. 1997. Effects of data structure and selection on estimated inbreeding depression in experimental Tribolium castaneum lines. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 114: 289–297.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F., Kennedy, B. W. and Eissen, J. J. 1995. Potential bias in inbreeding depression estimates when using pedigree relationships to assess the degree of homozygosity for loci under selection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 665–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groeneveld, E. 1990. PEST user’s manual. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Behaviour, Federal Agricultural Research Centre, Germany.Google Scholar
Guthrie, S. and Pidduck, H. G. 1990. Heritability of elbow osteochondrosis within a closed population of dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice 31: 93–96.Google Scholar
Karjalainen, L. and Ojala, M. 1997. Generation intervals and inbreeding coefficients in the Finnish Hound and the Finnish Spitz. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 114: 33–41.Google Scholar
Klemetsdal, G. 1998. The effect of inbreeding on racing performance in Norwegian cold-blooded trotters. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 30: 351–366.Google Scholar
Laben, R. C., Cupps, P. T., Mead, S. W. and Regan, W. M. 1955. Some effects of inbreeding and evidence of heterosis through outcrossing in a Holstein-Friesian herd. Journal of Dairy Science 38: 525–535.Google Scholar
Liinamo, A.-E., Karjalainen, L., Ojala, M. and Vilva, V. 1997. Estimates of genetic parameters and environmental effects for measures of hunting performance in Finnish Hounds. Journal of Animal Science 75: 622–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lingaas, F. 1989. [Generation interval on some Norwegian dog breeds.] Norsk Veterinærtidsskrift 1: 15–18.Google Scholar
Lingaas, F. and Klemetsdal, G. 1990. Breeding values and genetic trend for hip dysplasia in the Norwegian Golden Retriever population. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 107: 437–443.Google Scholar
Mäki, K., Liinamo, A.-E. and Ojala, M. 2000. Estimates of genetic parameters for hip and elbow dysplasia in Finnish Rottweilers. Journal of Animal Science 78: 1141–1148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meuwissen, T. H. E. and Sonesson, A. K. 1998. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding: overlapping generations. Journal of Animal Science 76: 2575–2583.Google Scholar
Neumaier, A. and Groeneveld, E. 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 30: 3–26.Google Scholar
Sigurdsson, A. and Jonmundsson, J. V. 1995. Inbreeding and its impact in the closed population of Icelandic dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 45: 11–16.Google Scholar
te Braake, M. F. H., Groen, A. F. and van der Lugt, A. W. 1994. Trends in inbreeding in Dutch Black and White dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 111: 356–366.Google Scholar
Ubbink, G. J. 1998. Inherited disease in purebred dog populations: predictions based on common ancestry. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ubbink, G. J., Knol, B. W. and Bouw, J. 1992. The relationship between homozygosity and the occurrence of specific diseases in Bouvier Belge des Flandres dogs in the Netherlands. Veterinary Quarterly 14: 137–140.Google Scholar
Vilva, V. 1997. Data preparation system WSYS-L. Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Nature 56: 330–338.Google Scholar