Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T10:57:17.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plasma metabolite and hormone concentrations in Friesian cows of differing genetic merit measured at two feeding levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. S. Flux ,
D. D. S. Mackenzie  and
G. F. Wilson
D. S. Flux
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
D. D. S. Mackenzie
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
G. F. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

Physiological differences between cows in hormone and metabolite concentrations were sought that may account for genetic differences in milk production.

Two groups of New Zealand Friesian cows, differing in genetic merit for fat production (high breeding index (HBI) and low breeding index (LBI)) by approximately 23 breeding index units (20 kg fat on the United Kingdom improved contemporary comparison scale), were each divided into two further groups, one of which was given freshly cut pasture to appetite and in the other intake was restricted to 70% of appetite. Eighteen blood samples were collected over a 24-h period from each of 16 cows fitted with indwelling jugular catheters. Samples were analysed for growth hormone, insulin, free fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate. Mean concentration of insulin was significantly higher in the HBI underfed group than in any other group (P < 0·01). Glucose concentration was significantly lower in the LBI group (P < 0·05), whose intake was restricted. The concentration of (3-hydroxybutyrate was significantly higher in the cows whose intake was restricted (P < 0·01) and the concentration fell markedly after feeding. Growth hormone concentrations were higher in the cows on restricted intake (P < 0·05) and in HBI cows but the differences were not statistically significant.

It was concluded that different patterns of blood metabolites and hormones are associated with cows that differ in genetic merit. Aspects of insulin and glucose metabolism, particularly at low planes of feeding, appear to offer most promise as indicators of high milk-solids production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , June 1984 , pp. 377 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassett, J. M. and Wallace, A. L. C. 1967. The influence of cortisol on plasma insulin in sheep. Diabetes 16: 566–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerstaffe, R., Annison, E. F. and Linzell, J. L. 1974. The metabolism of glucose, acetate, lipids and amino acids in lactating dairy cows. J.agric.Sci., Camb. 82: 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. and Hart, I. C. 1978a. Milk or meat. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production (ed. Lister, D.), Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., No. 1, pp. 87–98.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. and Hart, I. C. 1978b. Hormonal regulation of the partition of energy between milk and body tissue in adult cattle. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37: 281–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bines, J. A. and Hart, I. C. 1982. Metabolic limits to milk production, especially roles of growth hormone and insulin. J. Dairy Sci. 65: 1375–1389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bines, J. A., Hart, I. C. and Morant, S. V. 1980. Endocrine control of energy metabolism in the cow: the effect on milk yield and levels of some blood constituents of injecting growth hormone and growth hormone fragments. Br. J. Nutr. 43: 179–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowie, A. T., Forsyth, I. A. and Hart, I. C. 1980. Hormonal Control of Lactation, pp. 185–187. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, A. W. F., Grainger, C, MacKenzie, D. D. S., Flux, D. S., Wilson, G. F., Brookes, I. M. and Holmes, C. W. 1983. Nutritional and physiological studies of differences between Friesian cows of high and low genetic merit. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 43: 67–70.Google Scholar
Dole, V. P. 1956. A relation between non-esterified fatty acids in plasma and the metabolism of glucose. J. din. Invest. 35: 150–154.Google ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, F. C., Hunter, W. M. and Glover, J. S. 1963. The preparation of 131I-labelled human growth hormone of high specific activity. Biochem. J. 89: 114–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, C. N. and Randle, P. J. 1963. Immunoassay of insulin with insulin-antibody precipitate. Biochem. J. 88: 137–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, I. C., Bines, J. A., Morant, S. V. and Ridley, J. L. 1978. Endocrine control of energy metabolism in the cow: comparison of the level of hormones (prolactin, growth hormone, insulin. and thyroxine) and metabolites in the plasma of high- and low-yielding cattle at various stages of lactation. J. Endocr. 77: 333–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, I. C., Flux, D. S., Andrews, P. and McNeilly, A. S. 1975. Radioimmunoassay for ovine and caprine growth hormone: its application to the measurement of basal circulating levels of growth hormone in the goat. Hormone & Metab. Res. 7: 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hove, K. and Halse, K. 1978. Absence of feeding-induced variations in plasma insulin in hypoglycaemic ketonaemic cows. Ada vet. scand. 19: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hull, C. H. and Nie, N. H. 1979. Statistical Package for the toSocial Sciences: Update, pp. 122–131. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Jasiorowski, H., Reklewski, Z. and Stolzman, M. 1982. Friesian cattle in Poland. Wld Anim. Rev. 41: 46–47.Google Scholar
Miller, T. B., Chigaru, P., Downie, J. G., Galbraith, H., MacDonald, D. C. and Topps, J. H. 1978. Observations under field conditions — the stickler cow. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production (ed. Lister, D.), Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., No. 1, pp. 71–86.Google Scholar
Morris, C. A. and Wilton, J. W. 1976. Influence of body size on the biological efficiency of cows: a review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 56: 613–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, A. 1971. Glucocorticoid inhibition of glucose uptake by peripheral tissues: old and new evidence, molecular mechanisms and physiological significance. Perspect. Biol. Med. 14: 265–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, J. Y. F. and Linzhll, J. L. 1971. The secretion of cortisol and its mammaryuptake in the goat. J. Endocr. 50: 493–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peel, C. J., Fronk, T. J., Bauman, D. E. and Gorewit, R. C. 1983. Effect of exogenous growth hormone in early and latelactation on lactational performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 66: 776–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, L. V. and Lind, R. E. 1976. Lactational response of dairy cows to oral administration of a synthetic glucocorticoid. J. Dairy Sci. 59: 614–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernon, R. G. 1981. Lipid metabolism in the adipose tissue of ruminant animals. In Lipid Metabolism in Ruminant Animals (ed. Christie, W. W.), pp. 279–362. Pergamon, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C. K. and Elliot, J. W. 1973. Effect of roughage restriction on serum insulin in the dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 56: 375–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, D. H. and Mellanby, Jane. 1974. D-(–)-3-Hydroxybutyrate. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (ed. Bergmeyer, H. U.). 2nd ed. Vol. 4. pp. 1836–1839. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar