Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:27:56.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photoperiodism in the ewe: 2. The effects of various patterns of decreasing daylength on the onset of oestrus in clun forest ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Ducker ,
C. J. Thwaites  and
J. C. Bowman
M. J. Ducker
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire
C. J. Thwaites
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire
J. C. Bowman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire
Get access

Summary

In six light-proofed buildings experiments were conducted with Clun Forest ewes to determine whether the date of first oestrus was affected by the absolute size of reduction in the case of an abrupt decrease in daylength and by the rate of reduction in the case of a given total decrease in daylength.

The mean number of days from the onset of the light treatments to first oestrus (the reaction interval) for ewes receiving gradual decreases in daylength of 3·5, 7·2 or 10·9 min/day from 1 July were 66·4, 53·7 or 33·6 days, respectively. The reaction interval for ewes receiving abrupt decreases in daylength of 3·75, 7·75 or 11·75 hr on 1 July were 59·5, 44·8 or 33·6 days, respectively. A control group of ewes at pasture on natural daylength had a mean reaction interval of 66·2 days.

It is concluded that the various light treatments applied significantly affected the date of onset of oestrus in Clun Forest ewes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 115 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clegg, H. T., Cole, H. H. and Ganong, W. F. 1965. The role of light in the regulation of cyclical oestrous activity in sheep. Proc: Conf. oestrous cycle control in domestic animals. Misc. Publs. U.S. Dept. Agric. No. 1005, pp. 96–103.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H. and Miller, R. F. 1931. The vaginal smear of the ewe. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 28: 841–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. H. and Miller, R. F. 1932. The vaginal smear of the ewe. Anat. Ree. 52, Suppl. p. 50.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. H. and Bush, L. E. 1955. The effect of low environmental temperature on the initiation of the breeding season in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 885–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, A. F. and Laing, A. H. 1966. A preliminary report on the induction of oestrus in sheep with fixed periods of dark-housing. Vet. Ree. 78: 430–431.Google Scholar
Grant, R. 1934. Studies on the physiology of reproduction in the ewe. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 58: 1–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. 1952. Studies on the breeding season and reproduction of the ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42: 189–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr 1954. Light regulation of hormone secretion. Vitamins and hormones. Acad. Press (N. Y.) XII, 157–206.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. 1950. Periodicity in Suffolk sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 40: 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauleon, P. and Rougeot, J. 1962. Regulation des saisons sexuelles chez des brebis de races differentes au moyen de divers rythmes lumineux. Annls Biol. anim. Biochim. Biophys. 2: 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimura, K. and Asahida, Y. 1959. The environmental factors on the lamb growth, analytically studied with extra-seasonal-lambs. J. Fac. Fish. Anim. Husb. Hiroshima Univ. 2: 365–374.Google Scholar
Radford, H. H. and Watson, R. H. 1955. Changes in the vaginal contents of the Merino ewe throughout the year. Aust. J. agric. Res. 6: 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, H. M., Watson, R. H. and Wood, G. F. 1960. A crayon and associated harness for the detection of mating under field conditions. Aust. vet. J. 36: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggan, L. S. 1967. Studies on fertility in sheep with special reference to artificial insemination and control of ovarian cycles. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Williams, H. L. 1967. The intensification of sheep production. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Wodzicka-Tomaszewska, M., Hutchinson, J. C. D. and Bennett, N. W. 1967. Control of the annual rhythm of breeding ewes: the effect of an equatorial daylength with reversed thermal seasons. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. 1959. The breeding season of the sheep with particular reference to its modification by artificial means using light. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 39: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar