Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:32:55.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenotypic variation in live weight and live-weight changes of lactating Holstein-Friesian cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

E. P. C. Koenen ,
A. F. Groen  and
N. Gengler
E. P. C. Koenen
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
A. F. Groen
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
N. Gengler
Affiliation:
Unité de Zootechnie, Faculté Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques, Passage de Déportés 2, B-5030, Gembloux, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

This study quantified individual phenotypic variation in live weight and live-weight changes during the first three lactations and estimated the effects of age, lactation week and pregnancy on live weight. Data comprised weekly averaged live weight (calculated from daily observations) during 452 lactations of 239 Holstein-Friesian cows. Unadjusted mean live weights were 553 (s.d. 50), 611 (s.d. 55) and 654 (s.d. 57) kg during first, second and third parity, respectively. Estimated effect of growth during parity was 46, 52 and 23 kg for the first three parities. Mean maximum weight loss was 26, 22 and 22 kg for first, second and third parity and variation was large among individuals. Week of lactation when cows had their maximum weight loss ranged from 7 weeks in first lactation to 13 weeks in third lactation. Estimated maximum effect of pregnancy on live weight during the lactation varied from 27 to 59 kg. Phenotypic variance in live weight increased with parity. Repeatabilities of live-weight observations within parity were 0.85 . Across parities, high repeatabilities were found for calving weight and mean live weight but not for parameters associated with maximum weight loss. Correlations between weekly means and mean live weight during the whole of lactation were high. It was concluded that single live-weight observations of heifers are a good measurement of mean live weight during the first three panties.

Keywords

dairy cattlelive weightphenotypic variationrepeatability
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 109 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Ahlborn, G. and Dempfle, L. 1992. Genetic parameters for milk production and body size in New Zealand Holstein-Friesian and Jersey. Livestock Production Science 31: 205–219.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. and Pedersen, B. 1996. Growth and food intake curves for group-housed gilts and castrated male pigs. Animal Science 63: 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereskin, B. and Touchberry, R. W. 1967. Some effects of pregnancy on body weight and paunch girth. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 220–224.Google Scholar
Berglund, B. and Danell, B. 1987. Live weight changes, feed consumption, milk yield and energy balance in dairy cattle during the first period of lactation. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 37: 495–509.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. 1976. Regulation of food intake in dairy cows in relation to milk production. Livestock Production Science 3: 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobby, J. and Le Du, Y. L. P. 1978. On fitting curves to lactation data. Animal Production 26: 1–4.Google Scholar
Elzakker, P. J. M. van and Arendonk, J. A. M. van. 1993. Feed intake, body weight and milk production: genetic analysis of different measurements in lactating dairy heifers. Livestock Production Science 37: 37–51.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F. 1989. Economic values in cattle breeding. I. Influences of production circumstances in situations without output limitations. Livestock Production Science 22: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hietanen, H. and Ojala, M. 1995. Factors affecting body weight and its association with milk production traits in Finnish Ayrshire and Friesian cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science 45: 17–25.Google Scholar
Hohenbroken, W. D., Foldager, J., Jensen, J., Madsen, P. and Bech Andersen, B. 1995. Breed and nutritional effects and interactions on energy intake, production and efficiency of nutrient utilization in young bulls, heifers and lactating cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A. Animal Science 45: 92–98.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. and Heekman, N. 1989. A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite dimensional characters. Journal of Mathematical Biology 27: 429–450.Google Scholar
Koenen, E. P. C. and Groen, A. F. 1998. Genetic evaluation of body weight of lactating Holstein heifers using body measurements and conformation traits. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1709–1713.Google Scholar
Korver, S. 1988. Genetic aspects of feed intake and feed efficiency in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 20: 1–13.Google Scholar
Korver, S., Arendonk, J. A. M. van and Koops, W. J. 1985. A function for live-weight change between two calvings in dairy cattle. Animal Production 40: 233–241.Google Scholar
Miller, R. H., Hooven Jr, N. W. and Creegan, M. E. 1969. Weight changes in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 52: 90–94.Google Scholar
Oldenbroek, J. K. 1984. Holstein Friesians, Dutch Friesians and Dutch Red and Whites on two complete diets with a different amount of roughage: performance in second lactation. Livestock Production Science 11: 417–428.Google Scholar
Persuad, P., Simm, G. and Hill, W. G. 1991. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for yield, food intake and efficiency of dairy cows fed ad libitum. 1. Estimates for ‘total’ lactation measures and their relationship with li ve-weight traits. Animal Production 52: 435–444.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, L. R. and Dekkers, J. C. M. 1994. Random regressions in animal models for test-day production in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol. 18, p. 443 (Abstr).Google Scholar
Silvey, M. W. and Haydock, K. P. 1978. A note on the live-weight adjustment for pregnancy in cows. Animal Production 27: 113–116.Google Scholar
Touchberry, R. W. and Batra, T. R. 1976. Body weight changes in lactating purebred and crossbred dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 59: 733–743.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Bowman, P. J. and Goddard, M. E. 1994. Breeding objectives for pasture based dairy production systems. Livestock Production Science 40: 123–137.Google Scholar
Wood, P. D. P. 1967. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature 216: 1–4.Google Scholar
Wood, P. D. P., King, J. O. L. and Youdan, P. G. 1980. Relationships between size, live-weight change and milk production characters in early lactation in dairy cattle. Animal Production 31: 143–151.Google Scholar