Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:23:00.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The phenotypic association between the interval to post-partum ovulation and traditional measures of fertility in dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. O. Darwash ,
G. E. Lamming  and
J. A. Wooliams
A. O. Darwash
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
G. E. Lamming
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
J. A. Wooliams
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

The relationship between the interval to post-partum (PP) commencement of luteal activity (CLA) and traditional measures of fertility was studied in 1733 lactations of British Friesian cows. Milk progesterone (P4) concentrations were used to determine the interval to PP ovulation and to confirm pregnancy. Milk samples were taken thrice weekly from cows in 20 commercial herds and daily in the University of Nottingham research herd. Commencement of luteal activity was defined as the day of first PP occurrence ofP4 levels >3 μg/l which was then maintained for at least two consecutive readings in the commercial herds and for 4 days in the university herd. Records from animals with retained placenta, uterine infection or those treated with reproductive hormone preparations for reproductive disorders were excluded for this analysis from the original database of cows during 2503 lactations. The interval to PP CLA averaged 27·0 (s.d. 12·1) days (no. = 1733), interval to first service 71·2 (s.d. 19·9) days (no. = 1646), interval to conception 87·2 (s.d. 35·0) days (no. = 1510), number of services per conception 1·50 (s.d. 0·83, no. = 1510) and conception to first service was 0·65. Linear models were then fitted to subsets of the data with complete information to assess the influences of lactation number, season and herd (at least 1243 observations in all analyses). The interval to PP CLA was favourably correlated with measures of fertility such that for every day delay in the interval to CLA there was an average delay of 0·24 and 0·41 days (P < 0·001) in the interval to first service and conception, respectively. The number of services per conception was reduced by 0·11 for each additional 21 days in the interval between PP CLA and first service (P < 0·001). Furthermore, conception rate was influenced by the interval from the onset of luteal activity to first insemination (P < 0·01) such that each additional 21 days progressively reduced the probability of failure at a given insemination number to 0·89 of its previous value. There were significant effects of parity and season (P < 0·05) on the interval to first PP service while the variation among herds in the interval to PP service and days open was significant (P < 0·01). The regressions of measures of fertility on milk yield were not significant. This extensive database on the hormone profiles of PP cows shows that the early re-establishment of PP ovarian activity is an important prerequisite for high fertility.

Keywords

dairy cattlefertilityovulationprogesterone
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , August 1997 , pp. 9 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aylon, N. 1978. A review of embryonic mortality in cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54:483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boichard, D. 1990. Estimation of the economic values of conception rate in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 24:187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, D. C. and Lamming, G. E. 1978. Milk progesterone levels in relation to conception, repeat breeding and factors influencing acyclicity in dairy cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54: 447–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, W. R. and Smith, R. D. 1989. Interrelationship between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 767–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canfield, R. W., Sniffen, C. J. and Butler, W. R. 1990. Effects of excess degradable protein on postpartum reproduction in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 2342–2349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, R. D. 1972. Regression models for life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 343:187–220.Google Scholar
Darwash, A. O., Lamming, G. E. and Woolliams, J. A. 1997. Estimation of genetic variation in the interval from calving to postpartum ovulation of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science In press.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. N. and Farver, T. B. 1980. Conception rates of Holstein bulls for artificial insemination on a California dairy. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 621–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erb, R. E., Garverick, H. A., Randel, R. D., Brown, B. L. and Callahan, C. J. 1976. Profiles of reproductive hormones associated with fertile and non-fertile insemination of dairy cows. Theriogenology 5: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esslemont, R. J. 1992. Measuring dairy herd fertility. Veterinary Record 131: 209–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esslemont, R. J. and Peeler, E. J. 1993. The scope for raising margins in dairy herds by improving fertility and health. British Veterinary Journal 149:537–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faust, M. A., McDaniel, B. T., Robison, O. W. and Britt, J. H. 1988. Environmental and yield effects on reproduction in primiparous Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 3092–3099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonesca, F. A., Britt, J. H., McDaniel, J. C. and Rakes, A. H. 1983. Reproductive traits of Holsteins and Jerseys. Effects of age, milk yield, and clinical abnormalities on involution of cervix and uterus, ovulation, estrous cycles, detection of estrus, conception rate and days open. Journal of Dairy Science 66:1128–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furr, B. J. A. 1973. Radio immunoassay of progesterone in peripheral plasma of the domestic fowl in various physiological states and follicular venous plasma. Ada Endocrinologica 68: 409–417.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. O., Ford, S. P., Young, J. W., Conley, A. J. and Freeman, A. E. 1990. Increased milk production versus reproductive and energy status of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 2749–2758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollon, B. F. and Branton, C. 1971. The effects of early postpartum weight changes on reproductive performance of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 54: 787 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Kalbfleich, J. D. and Prentice, R. L. 1980. The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E. and Bulman, D. C. 1976. The use of milk progesterone radio-immunoassay in the diagnosis and treatment of subfertility in dairy cows. British Veterinary Journal 132: 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamming, G. E. and Darwash, A. O. 1995. Effects of interluteal interval on subsequent luteal phase length and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Biology of Reproduction 52: (suppl. 1) 72 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E., Darwash, A. O. and Back, H. L. 1989. Corpus luteum function in dairy cows and embryo mortality. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 37: 245–252.Google ScholarPubMed
Marion, G. B. and Gier, H. T. 1968. Factors affecting bovine ovarian activity after parturition. Journal of Animal Science 27:1621–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, R. R. and Echternkamp, S. E. 1982. Hormonal asynchrony and embryonic development. Theriogenology 17: 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebel, R. L. and McGilliard, M. L. 1993. Interactions of high milk yield and reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 3257–3268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oltenacu, P. A., Britt, J. H., Braun, R. K. and Mellenberger, R. W. 1984. Effect of health status on culling and reproductive performance of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67:1783–1792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, J. Y., Schrick, F. N. and Inskeep, E. K. 1994. Relationship of pregnancy rate to peripheral progesterone and estradiol in beef cows. Theriogenology 42: 247–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senger, P. L., Hillers, K. L., Mitchell, J. R., Fleming, W. N. and Darlington, R. L. 1984. Effects of serum treated semen, bulls and herdsmen-inseminators on conception to first service in large commercial dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 686–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, H. M., Wilcox, C. J., Thatcher, W. W., Becker, R. B. and Morse, D. 1992. Factors affecting days open, gestation length, and calving interval in Florida dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 288–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, J. S., Smith, M. K. and Call, E. P. 1983. Factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows first inseminated after five weeks postpartum. Journal of Dairy Science 66:1148–1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thatcher, W. W. and Wilcox, C. J. 1973. Postpartum estrus as indicator of reproductive status in the dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science 56:608–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R. 1981. Survival data and GLIM. Applied Statistics 30:310–311.Google Scholar
Urquhart, N. S. 1982. Adjustment in covariance when one factor affects the covariate. Biometrics 38: 651–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitmore, H. L., Tylor, W. J. and Casida, L. E. 1974. Effects of early postpartum breeding in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 38: 339–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed