Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T20:25:29.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase-feeding to optimize performance and quality of Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

S. de Campeneere ,
L. O. Fiems ,
B. G. Cottyn  and
Ch.V. Boucqué
S. de Campeneere
Affiliation:
Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Ghent, Scheideweg 68, B-9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
L. O. Fiems
Affiliation:
Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Ghent, Scheideweg 68, B-9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
B. G. Cottyn
Affiliation:
Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Ghent, Scheideweg 68, B-9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
Ch.V. Boucqué
Affiliation:
Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Ghent, Scheideweg 68, B-9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

To optimize performance and carcass quality of Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls four phased feeding regimens were evaluated. All diets were offered ad libitum and consisted of 650 g concentrates and 350 g maize silage per kg dry matter (DM). Total period was divided into three phases (ca. 360 to 460, 460 to 570 and 570 to 680 kg). All four groups received the same maize silage but the different energy and protein densities were applied using different concentrates. During the three phases, the negative control (NC) group constantly received a diet with a low protein and a moderate energy density; the second group (DP) received with each phase diets with decreasing protein density while the energy density remained moderate; the third group (IE) received diets with increasing energy density at a constantly high protein density and the last group (DPIE) received diets which decreased in protein and increased in energy density.

The NC group grew significantly slower during the first interval (1·37 v. 1·62 kg/day for the other groups), resulting in a significantly longer total finishing period. During the third period IE had the slowest growth. The NC group needed 21 and 20 days more than the DP and DPIE groups, respectively, to reach the same slaughter weight. The NC group had the lowest DM intake during the first interval, the IE group during the third interval. No significant differences (P > 0·05) were found for food conversion, when expressed as DM or NEF (net energy for fattening). IE had the worst protein conversion while NC had the best, with the two other groups being intermediate.

The only important significant difference concerning carcass quality was the improved dressing proportion of the IE and DP groups. Although significant, differences in the fat content of the m. longissimus thoracis are of minor importance. These results proved that for Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls, protein density of the diet can be decreased with increasing live weight, while energy should be increased to give optimal performance.

Keywords

bullscarcass qualitydouble-musclingenergy intakeprotein
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , August 1999 , pp. 275 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, H. R. 1978. Effect of energy level on growth and efficiency. In Patterns of growth and development in cattle (ed. Boer, H. de and Martin, J.), pp.393–412. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. T., Bergen, W. G., Merkel, R. A. and Hawkins, D. R. 1988. The effect of dietary crude protein level on rate, efficiency and composition of gain of growing beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 66: 1990–1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1991. Community scale for the classification of carcasses of adult bovine animals. Official publications of the European Communities no. 1208/81, 2930/81 and 1026/91, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Boever, J. L. de, Cottyn, B. G., Fiems, L. O. and BoucquéCh. V., 1992. Determination of chemical composition of beef meat by NIRS. In Near infra-red spectroscopy. Bridging the gap between data analysis and NIR applications (ed. Hildrum, K. I., Isakson, T., Naes, T. and Tandberg, A.), pp. 339–344. Ellis Horwood, London.Google Scholar
Boucqué, Ch. V., Fiems, L. O., Cottyn, B. G. and Buysse, F. X. 1984. Besoin en protéines de taureaux culards au cours de la période de finition. Revue de l’Agriculture 37: 661–670.Google Scholar
Boucqué, Ch. V., Fiems, L. O., Moermans, R. J., Cottyn, B. G. and Buysse, F. X. 1980. Effect of energy density of diets for intensive bull beef production on intake, growth rate and feed conversion. Annales de Zootechnie 29: (suppl.) 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouquiaux, J.-M. and Hellemans, R. 1996. Problématique de la production de viande bovine en Belgique. Publication no 583 de ľ Institut Economique Agricole, Bruxelles, p. 48.Google Scholar
Campeneere, S. de, Fiems, L. O., Vanacker, J. M. and Boucqué, Ch. V. 1999a. Empty body chemical composition estimated from non-carcass parts in Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls. Animal Science 68: 223–229.Google Scholar
Campeneere, S. de, Fiems, L. O., Voorde, G. van de, Vanacker, J. M., Boucqué, Ch.V. and Demeyer, D. I. 1999b. Estimation of chemical carcass composition from 8th rib characteristics with Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls. Meat Science 51: 27–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Clinquart, A., Eenaeme, C. van, Vooren, T. van, Hoof, J. van, Hornick, J. L. and Istasse, L. 1994. Meat quality in relation to breed (Belgian Blue v. Holstein) and conformation (double-muscled v. dual purpose type). Sciences des Aliments 14: 401–407.Google Scholar
Cobic, T. S., Bacvanski, S. and Vucetic, S. 1980. The influence of protein levels on growth rate and feed efficiency. Annales de Zootechnie 29: (suppl.) 251–260.Google Scholar
Es, A. J. H. van. 1977. The energetics of fat deposition during growth. Nutrition and Metabolism 21: 88–104.Google ScholarPubMed
Es, A. J. H. van. 1978. Feed evaluation for ruminants. I. The system in use from May 1977 onwards in The Netherlands. Livestock Production Science 5: 331–345.Google Scholar
Fiems, L. O., Boucqué, Ch. V., Cottyn, B. G. and Buysse, F. X. 1990. Effect of energy density by dietary incorporation of fats on the performance of the double-muscled bulls. Animal Feed Science and Technology 30: 267–274.Google Scholar
Fiems, L. O., Campeneere, S. de, Bogaerts, D. F., Cottyn, B. G. and Boucqué, Ch. V. 1998. The influence of dietary energy and protein levels on performance, carcass and meat quality of Belgian White-blue double-muscled finishing bulls. Animal Science 66: 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiems, L. O., Moermans, R. J., Cottyn, B. G., Boucqué, Ch. V. and Campeneere, S. de. 1999. Voluntary feed intake in dual-purpose and double-muscled Belgian White-Blue bulls. Proceedings of the fifth Zodiac symposium on regulation of food intake (ed. Heide, D. van der, Huisman, E. A., Kanis, E., Osse, J. W. M. and Verstegen, M. W. A.). In press.Google Scholar
Geay, Y., Robelin, J., Vermorel, M. and C., Béranger 1982. Muscular development and energy utilisation in cattle: the double muscled as an extreme or a deviant animal. In Muscle hypertrophy of genetic origin and its use to improved beef production (ed. King, J. W. B. and Ménissier, F.), pp. 74–87. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
Hanset, R. 1996. Le Blanc-Bleu Belge face à la nouvelle donné économique. Journée d’étude, Agribex, 15 February, Brussels. Google Scholar
Hanset, R., Stasse, A. and Michaux, C. 1979. Feed intake and feed efficiency in double-muscled and conventional cattle. Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie 96: 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzer, Z., Levy, D., Samuel, V. and Bruckenthal, I. 1986. Interactions between supplementary nitrogen source and ration energy density on performance and nitrogen utilization in growing and fattening male cattle. Animal Production 42: 19–28.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z., Folman, Y., Bleiberg, M. and Ilan, D. 1980. Protein requirements of male cattle fattened on diets differing in energy concentrations. Animal Production 30: 189–197.Google Scholar
Martin, T. G., Perry, T. W., Beeson, W. M. and Mohler, M. T. 1978. Protein levels for bulls: comparison of three continuous dietary levels on growth and carcass traits. Journal of Animal Science 47: 29–33.Google Scholar
Merchen, N. R., Darden, D. E., Berger, L. L., Fahey, G.C. Jr., Titgemeyer, E. C. and Fernando, R. L. 1987. Effects of dietary energy level and supplemental protein source on performance of growing steers and nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 65: 658–668.Google ScholarPubMed
Prior, R. L., Kohlmeier, R. H., Cundiff, L. V., Dikeman, M. E. and Crouse, J. D. 1977. Influence of dietary energy and protein on growth and carcass composition in different biological types of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 45: 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, K., Daenicke, R. and Oslage, H. J. 1982. The optimum protein supply for young fattening bulls on a high-energy level. In Protein and energy supply for high production of milk and meat, pp. 153–164. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences. 1997. SPSS 8.0 for Windows 95. SPSS inc., Chicago, IL. Google Scholar
Tamminga, S., Straelen, W. M. van, Subnel, A. P. J., Meijer, R. G. M., Steg, A., Wever, C. J. G. and Blok, M. C. 1994. The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40: 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uytterhaegen, L., Claeys, E., Demeyer, D., Lippens, M., Fiems, L. O., Boucqué, Ch. V., Voorde, G. van de and Bastiaens, A. 1994. Effects of double-muscling on carcass quality, beef tenderness and myofibrillar protein degradation in Belgian Blue White bulls. Meat Science 38: 255–267.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.Google ScholarPubMed
Verbeke, R. and Voorde, G. van de. 1978. Détermination de la composition de demi-carcasses de bovins par la dissection d’une seule côte. Revue de ľ Agriculture 31: 575–580.Google Scholar
Zinn, R. A. 1989. Influence of level and source of dietary fat on its comparative feeding value in finishing diets for steers: feedlot cattle growth and performance. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1029–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed