Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T11:46:06.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance testing for beef: inter-relationships among traits in bulls tested from an early age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. B. Willis  and
T. R. Preston
M. B. Willis
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Apartado 24, San José de las Lajas, Habana, Cuba
T. R. Preston
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Apartado 24, San José de las Lajas, Habana, Cuba
Get access

Summary

1. Performance tests were made on 221 bulls of eight breeds or crosses from 90 days of age (weaning) up to 400 kg live weight. Feeding was in individual pens on a high-energy complete diet.

2. Pre-weaning gain was not significantly related to gain on test (r = 0·11) nor was 90-day weight to gain on test (r = 0·26) or feed conversion (r = −0·15). Weight for age at 200 and 300 kg was highly correlated with final weight for age (r = 0·72 and 0·89 respectively) while gain on test and final weight for age had a pooled correlation (across breeds) of r = 0·95. The correlation of feed conversion with gain on test was highly significant in all breeds. The range of values (−0·72 to −0·86) is higher than any previously reported estimates possibly due to an absence of initial weight effects, a reduction in the proportion of feed used for maintainenance and the use of complete diets.

3. It is suggested that with this testing system at least 50% of bulls could be culled at 300 kg without affecting selection of the best 20% of all bulls starting the test.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , August 1970 , pp. 451 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous. 1958. Advanced registry board for beef cattle. Rep. No. 3, Dept Agric Ontario.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. and Mathews, D. J. 1955. Performance testing studies with beef cattle. Bull. Utah agric. Exp. Stn, No. 377.Google Scholar
Bogart, R. W. and Frischknecht, W. D. 1967. Relationship of weights, scores and gains in growing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 883 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Brown, C. J. 1963. Performance of bulls on Arkansas cooperative beef bull performance test. Rep. Ark. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 124.Google Scholar
Carter, R. C. and Kincaid, C. M. 1959. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters in beef cattle. 3. Genetic and phenotypic correlation among economic characters. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, B. H. Jr, Jones, B. M. Jr, Cundiff, L. V. and Bradley, N. W. 1967. Correlations among performance traits in individually fed bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 202 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Dahman, J. J. and Bogart, R. 1952. Some factors affecting rate and economy of gains in beef cattle. Stn tech. Bull. Ore. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 26.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1958. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kidwell, J. F., McCormick, J. A. and McCartney, L. O. 1955. Bull indexing. Circ. Nev. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 6.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. H. E. 1966. Report on the 1965/66 Hereford bull performance test. Beef Ree. Assoc. Tech. Rep. No. 3.Google Scholar
Lickley, C. R., Stonaker, H. H., Sutherland, T. M. and Riddle, K. R. 1960. Relationship between mature size, daily gain and efficiency of feed utilization in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 957 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Moore, D. B., Stonaker, H. H. and Riddle, K. R. 1961. Factors influencing comparisons of Hereford bulls for rate of gain. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 255–259.Google Scholar
O'Mary, C. C., Vance, D. W. and Ensminger, M. E. 1959. Comparison of three systems of performance testing beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 1465 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Pepito, N. N., Chambers, D., Whiteman, J. V. and Stephens, D. F. 1961. Predicting feed efficiency of beef bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 910 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Pierce, C. D., Avery, H. G., Burris, M. and Bogart, R. 1954. Rate and efficiency of gains in beef cattle. II. Some factors affecting performance testing. Stn tech. Bull. Ore. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 33.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1970. Intensive Beef Production. Pergamon Press, Oxford (in press).Google Scholar
Riley, J. G., Thompson, G. B. and Dyer, A. J. 1967. Accuracy of 28- and 56-day gains for culling feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 1469 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Swiger, L. A. and Hazel, L. N. 1961. Optimum length of feeding period in selecting for gain of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, M. B. and Preston, T. R. 1967. Some aspects of performance testing in the Charolais breed. Rev. cubana Cienc. agric. (Eng. ed.) 1: 21–32.Google Scholar
Willis, M. B. and Preston, T. R. 1968. The performance of different breeds of beef cattle in Cuba. Anim. Prod. 10: 77–84.Google Scholar