Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:10:23.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of crossbred sheep from a synthetic Dam Line

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. Smith ,
J. W. B. King ,
D. Nicholson ,
B. T. Wolf  and
P. R. Bampton
C. Smith
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
J. W. B. King
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
D. Nicholson
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
B. T. Wolf
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
P. R. Bampton
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

The performance of traditional Border Leicester × Blackface cross- breds (Greyfaces) was compared with Blackface crosses from a synthetic Dam Line developed from four breeds; Finnish Landrace (47%), East Friesian (24%), Border Leicester (17%) and Dorset Horn (12%). The Dam Line crosses were lighter (−10%), showed earlier sexual maturity, were more prolific (+12%) and weaned more lambs (+13%) than the traditional crosses but had similar litter weights and flock survival. The lambs from the Dam Line crosses grew more slowly (−5%) (comparing twins with twins and singles with singles) but their carcass composition and carcass grades were similar to those from the traditional crosses.

An assessment of the relative biological efficiency for meat production of the two crossbred types indicated an advantage of about 10 to 12% in favour of the Dam Line crossbred type.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , August 1979 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, J. D. 1975. A field trial of Finnish Landrace rams as sires of crossbred ewes. Anim. Prod. 20: 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeble, K. and Barker, J. D. 1976. Finnish Landrace × Border Leicester rams as sires of crossbred ewes. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Zurich, 1976.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P., Read, J. L. and Russell, W. S. 1968. A comparative trial of crossbred ewes by Finnish Landrace and other sires. Anim. Prod. 10: 413–421.Google Scholar
Large, R. V. 1970. The biological efficiency of meat production in sheep. Anim. Prod. 12: 393–401.Google Scholar
North of Scotland College of Agriculture. 1976. The voluntary food intake of six sheep breeds. Research Investigations and Field Trials, pp. 60–62. North of Scotland College of Agriculture, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Ricordeau, G., Tchamitchian, L., Thimonier, J., Flamant, J. C. and Theriez, M. 1978. First survey of results obtained in France on reproductive and maternal performance in sheep with particular reference to the Romanov breed and crosses with it. Livest. Prod. Sci. 5: 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Agricultural Colleges. 1977. A study of high lamb output production systems (ed. Littlejohn, L. J. S.). Tech. Note No. 16, N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W., Large, R. V. and Walsingham, J. M. 1972. The importance of the size of the female in sheep. Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. 8(3): 90–96.Google Scholar